RE: [Clamav-users] Mail taking a *long* time to hit the list

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Michael > St. Laurent > Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 5:11 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: [Clamav-users] Mail taking a *long* time to hit the list > > > Antony Stone w

RE: [Clamav-users] sigtool not working correctly

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mark Novak > Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 2:44 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] sigtool not working correctly > > > What is odd is that I was using the /usr/local/share/clamav path b

RE: [Clamav-users] Re: malformed pattern

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of peter > Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 11:29 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Clamav-users] Re: malformed pattern > > > Look at these lines bottom (/var/spool/qmailscan/qmail-queue.log). In > qmail-scan

RE: [Clamav-users] Clamd starts failing after DB reload

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jaap > Scholten > Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 10:28 AM > To: Clamav-Users > Subject: [Clamav-users] Clamd starts failing after DB reload > > > Hi, can anyone help with this: > > I am runing clamd 0.68 on R

RE: [Clamav-users] Re: malformed pattern

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of peter > Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 6:39 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Clamav-users] Re: malformed pattern > > > peter wrote: > > pet

[Clamav-users] Search tool on www.clamav.net

Would it be possible for the online search at http://clamav-du.securesites.net/cgi-bin/clamgrok to show the time that the signature was added to the database? This would be real handy. Jim --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get

RE: [Clamav-users] This is new and I haven't change anything....

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ken Goods > Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 1:08 PM > To: Clamav-Users (E-mail) > Subject: [Clamav-users] This is new and I haven't change anything > > > Installed this machine about 2 weeks ago using

RE: [Clamav-users] malformed pattern

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of peter > Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 12:05 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Clamav-users] malformed pattern > > > Hi, I have problem with clamav 0.70 stable. > Malformed patter line 13898 (file > /v

RE: [Clamav-users] freshclam vs selfcheck

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Frank > Elsner > Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 2:46 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] freshclam vs selfcheck > > > On Thu, 29 Apr 2004

RE: [Clamav-users] Re: OT: Just some interesting stats

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jesse > Guardiani > Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 1:56 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Clamav-users] Re: OT: Just some interesting stats > > > Rick Macdougall wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > http://mail.

RE: [Clamav-users] clamav and postfix

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Faustino Benitez Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 1:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Clamav-users] clamav and postfix Hi: I have a question about the setup of clamav and postfix: Use two instances of postfi

RE: [Clamav-users] freshclam vs selfcheck

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Frank > Elsner > Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 1:19 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Clamav-users] freshclam vs selfcheck > > > > RedHat 7.3, ClamAV version 0.70 > > Can anybody explain this ? fres

RE: [Clamav-users] Zip module failure. ERROR

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Guillermo > Llenas > Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 10:02 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Clamav-users] Zip module failure. ERROR > > > > > Hello, > > I'm getting the following error message in

RE: [Clamav-users] clamav attachment not deleted from /tmp

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of jean-marc > pouchoulon > Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 6:33 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Clamav-users] clamav attachment not deleted from /tmp > > > Hi, > On fedora core B > using mimed

RE: [Clamav-users] Clam assigns wrong virus name??

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ralf > Guenthner > Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 10:10 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Clam assigns wrong virus name?? > > > > I guess that you use very old database - Win32.Mix

RE: [Clamav-users] Problem with clamscan .vs. clamdscan

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Joe Maimon > Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2004 5:01 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with clamscan .vs. clamdscan > >

RE: [Clamav-users] Problem with clamscan .vs. clamdscan

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Matt > Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2004 2:16 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with clamscan .vs. clamdscan > > > > > > > > >Because clamscan doesnt use clamav.conf!! S ma

RE: [Clamav-users] Problem with clamscan .vs. clamdscan

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave Ewart > Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2004 11:45 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with clamscan .vs. clamdscan > > > On Tuesday, 27.04.2004 at

RE: [Clamav-users] Problem with clamscan .vs. clamdscan

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bill > Maidment > Sent: Monday, April 26, 2004 6:30 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with clamscan .vs. clamdscan > > > Jim Maul wrote: &g

Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with clamscan .vs. clamdscan

> On Fri, 2004-04-23 at 08:40, Stephen Gran wrote: >> use /usr/bin/clamscan --tempdir=/tmp -r -i --block-encrypted bob.zip > > Any idea why the config file setting to enable blocking encrypted files > is not working? > Because clamscan doesnt use clamav.conf!! S many people dont seem to reali

RE: [Clamav-users] Problems detecting Worm.SomeFool.Y

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andreas > Haase > Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 6:55 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Clamav-users] Problems detecting Worm.SomeFool.Y > > > Hello, > > > Have you tried to locate or find *.cvd?

RE: [Clamav-users] upgrading clamav changes permissions on directories?

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kristof > Petr > Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 5:02 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] upgrading clamav changes permissions on > directories? > >

RE: [Clamav-users] upgrading clamav changes permissions ondirectories?

-04-21 at 10:58, Dilip M wrote: > > On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 11:02:02 +0200, Krištof Petr > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > Jim Maul wrote: > > > > > >> I just upgraded my clamav RPMs from 0.70rc to 0.70 (from > > >> http://c

RE: [Clamav-users] Problems detecting Worm.SomeFool.Y

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andreas > Haase > Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 2:46 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Clamav-users] Problems detecting Worm.SomeFool.Y > > > Hello, > > > > Version 0.67 detects the virus correct

[Clamav-users] upgrading clamav changes permissions on directories?

i noticed that all three of these directories have changed back to clamav.clamav. Would it be possible to NOT change ownership back to clamav during an upgrade? Its not that big of a deal, just sorta annoying. Thanks. Jim Maul Eastern Long Island Hospital 631-477-5417 CONFIDENTIALITY

RE: [Clamav-users] Problems detecting Worm.SomeFool.Y

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andreas > Haase > Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 8:42 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Clamav-users] Problems detecting Worm.SomeFool.Y > > > Hello, > > I have several installations of clamav. Versio

RE: [Clamav-users] W32.Netsky.B@mm not removed

-Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jim Maul > > Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 11:04 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: [Clamav-users] [EMAIL PROTECTED] not removed > > > hi, > > > I

RE: [Clamav-users] W32.Netsky.B@mm not removed

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Riccardo > Ghiglianovich > Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 12:10 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] [EMAIL PROTECTED] not removed > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 >

RE: [Clamav-users] W32.Netsky.B@mm not removed

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Pad > Hosmane > Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 9:34 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Clamav-users] [EMAIL PROTECTED] not removed > > > Hi, > Clamav is not detecting or cleaning [EMAIL PROTECTED] I a

RE: [Clamav-users] freshclam PID file .... no where to be found

  -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 4:45 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [Clamav-users] freshclam PID file no where to be found I have tried: /etc/freshclam.conf PidFil

RE: [Clamav-users] Problems with clamav and qmailscanner

  -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Administrador da RedeSent: Friday, April 16, 2004 3:19 PMTo: >Subject: [Clamav-users] Problems with clamav and qmailscanner I have a qmail system with clamav e qmailscanner. it seems

RE: [Clamav-users] clamd segfault

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bill Pitz > Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 12:10 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Clamav-users] clamd segfault > > > I've had an occasional problem with clamd segfaulting. The basics of my > system a

RE: [Clamav-users] Complete system scan...

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mike van > Vugt > Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 2:41 PM > To: ClamAV Mail List > Subject: RE: [Clamav-users] Complete system scan... > > > On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 19:35, Brad Morgan wrote: > > > > > > What

RE: [Clamav-users] Complete system scan...

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mike van > Vugt > Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 11:23 AM > To: ClamAV Mail List > Subject: [Clamav-users] Complete system scan... > > > Hi, > > What command can I use to scan my compleet system ??? >

RE: [Clamav-users] Complete system scan...

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mike van > Vugt > Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 11:23 AM > To: ClamAV Mail List > Subject: [Clamav-users] Complete system scan... > > > Hi, > > What command can I use to scan my compleet system ??? >

RE: [Clamav-users] revisit question about passworded zips

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bart > Silverstrim > Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 9:55 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Clamav-users] revisit question about passworded zips > > > I've seen this batted back and forth for awhile a

RE: [Clamav-users] My installation of ClamAV doesn't detect zipped virus

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Oscar A. > Valdez > Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 3:09 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Clamav-users] My installation of ClamAV doesn't detect zipped > virus > > > I just installed ClamAV, but Wor

RE: [Clamav-users] clamav and milter - dedicated mailing list.

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Antony > Stone > Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 10:18 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] clamav and milter - dedicated mailing list. > > > On Wednesday 14 April 2004 3:01 pm, Odhiam

RE: [Clamav-users] clamd is not scanning my email.

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 3:39 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Clamav-users] clamd is not scanning my email. > > > I have done everything in the docs and still it just doe

RE: [Clamav-users] Netsky P not being blocked, using 0.70-rc

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Henry > Harvey > Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 2:14 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Netsky P not being blocked, using 0.70-rc > > > I also have the same problem. > Apparently, I h

RE: [Clamav-users] RPM Files....

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mike van > Vugt > Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 8:16 AM > To: ClamAV Mail List > Subject: [Clamav-users] RPM Files > > > Can anyone tell me what goes wrong here Downloaded the files but > keep ge

RE: [Clamav-users] submitting samples (name instead?)

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Niek > Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 11:16 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] submitting samples (name instead?) > > > Jim Maul wrote: > > > >

RE: [Clamav-users] submitting samples (name instead?)

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Henry > Harvey > Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 10:16 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Clamav-users] submitting samples (name instead?) > > > Would it be possible to report what > viruses (names) are

RE: [Clamav-users] Cleaning MBOX files?

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jack > London Networks > Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 6:47 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Cleaning MBOX files? > > > If I use the --remove flag, it removes the whole mailbox fi

RE: [Clamav-users] Some viruses go through

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mimmus > Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 10:14 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Clamav-users] Some viruses go through > > > Hi, > I'm using Sendmail+ClamAv+ClamAV-milter (latest version in RPM format:

RE: [Clamav-users] testvirus.org results

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Robert > Blayzor > Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 10:35 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] testvirus.org results > > > On 3/31/04 9:51 AM, "Antony Stone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

RE: [Clamav-users] Segfault on password protected rar?

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ethan P > Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 10:32 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Clamav-users] Segfault on password protected rar? > > > I'm running ClamAV .65 on an RH9 system, with Qmail-Scanner-1.

RE: [Clamav-users] clam not fresh

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mark Novak > Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 10:14 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] clam not fresh > > My number of signatures is exactly the same as yours. When I grep for > somefoo

RE: [Clamav-users] clam not fresh

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mark Novak > Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 5:37 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] clam not fresh > > > I did exactly that, deleted the cvd files and re-ran freshclam. I am > on

RE: [Clamav-users] clam not fresh

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Colin A. > Bartlett > Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 2:47 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Clamav-users] clam not fresh > > > > Another poster pointed to testvirus.org for testing. I think you'

RE: [Clamav-users] ClamAV missing 100% of "Worm.SomeFool.Gen-1" on (clamav-users: addressed to exclusive sender for this address) OSX

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > OpenMacNews > Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 3:35 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV missing 100% of "Worm.SomeFool.Gen-1" > on (clamav-users: addressed to exclusive sender

RE: [Clamav-users] database.clamav.net unresolvable ?

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mark Moshe > Kushinsky > Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 2:19 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Clamav-users] database.clamav.net unresolvable ? > > > Cannot resolve database.clamav.net using the attbi.

RE: [Clamav-users] freshclam config

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Guillaume > Jullien > Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 12:35 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Clamav-users] freshclam config > > > Hi, > > When I run > # freshclam > > I get this error > > Can't ch

Re: [Clamav-users] Postmaster bounces and such.

> Dropping isn't good or bad, however if you're not careful it could come > around and bite you on the back side. > > I notify the 'recipient' in the event the email in question was expected > (part of a project, family / business correspondence etc). > > Otherwise they could be wondering where the

Re: [Clamav-users] Postmaster bounces and such.

> On Saturday 20 March 2004 02:32, Jim Maul wrote: > >> The message gets quarantined and no one is notified. > > Why ? Virus message is not quarantined, it's rejected. > All it is depend from configuration. > because qmail does not "reject anything" at

Re: [Clamav-users] Postmaster bounces and such.

> On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 17:01, jef moskot wrote: >> Worse than that, if the virus is still attached, you're now sending it >> to >> someone who might not have otherwise received it. You're helping to >> spread the infection. > > When I say bounce I mean reject. We try not to accept them. But > som

RE: [Clamav-users] Postmaster bounces and such.

> On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 12:51, Jim Maul wrote: >> > We tend to forward the postmaster account off our each of our mail >> > servers to other central servers that the admins read it on. If the >> > postmaster account receives a virus (they are fairly popular addresses

RE: [Clamav-users] qmail-scanner 1.21 and ClamAV .67 or .70

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Steve > Schofield > Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 1:22 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Clamav-users] qmail-scanner 1.21 and ClamAV .67 or .70 > > > I'm trying to get Q/S 1.21 and ClamAV working on F

RE: [Clamav-users] Postmaster bounces and such.

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Robert > Schmidt > Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 11:06 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Clamav-users] Postmaster bounces and such. > > > We tend to forward the postmaster account off our each of ou

RE: [Clamav-users] clamassassin and procmail config

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of pi > Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 12:38 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] clamassassin and procmail config > > > Ling C. Ho wrote: > > > > > > > You can also try amavis-new. http:

RE: [Clamav-users] Bagle.Q

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Scott Ryan > Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 9:31 AM > To: Clam Antivirus List > Subject: [Clamav-users] Bagle.Q > > > I am running 0.67-1 and was looking to get a copy of the virus to test > if clamd catc

RE: [Clamav-users] testvirus.org eicar tests failing w/ ClamAV version devel-20040316 on OSX+CGPro

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Thomas > Lamy > Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 3:43 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] testvirus.org eicar tests failing w/ ClamAV > version devel-20040316 on OSX+CGPro > > > Sorry,

RE: [Clamav-users] testvirus.org eicar tests failing w/ ClamAV version devel-20040316 on OSX+CGPro

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > OpenMacNews > Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 11:27 AM > To: ClamAV Users List > Subject: [Clamav-users] testvirus.org eicar tests failing w/ ClamAV > version devel-20040316 on OSX+CGPro > > > hi, > > Cla

RE: [Clamav-users] Freshclam died

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tomasz > Kojm > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 3:03 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Freshclam died > > > On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 11:28:53 -0500

[Clamav-users] Freshclam died

to update the database, but it definitely should not die because of it. Restarting freshclam (service freshclam start) works fine again but does anyone know why it died to begin with? I may just go back to the cron version to prevent this in the future. Thanks Jim Maul Eastern Long Island

RE: [Clamav-users] Bagle.N Virus cannot be detected by local clamscan

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ling Ho > Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 2:06 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Clamav-users] Bagle.N Virus cannot be detected by local > clamscan > > > Hi > > One of my user (and possibly another)

RE: [Clamav-users] PB: ClamAV works but doesn't detect viruses

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Michael > Shekman > Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 9:13 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Clamav-users] PB: ClamAV works but doesn't detect viruses > > > I have a different issue: ALL the tes

Re: [Clamav-users] debian/qmail install

> I've just installed clamav 0.67 on stable debian, from a > debian backport, using "apt-get install clamav". > (qmail is the MTA) > The package installs the following 6 modules: > clamav, clamav-base, clamav-freshclam > libclamav1, libgmp3, ucf. > * > I can successfully use clamscan to scan and de

RE: [Clamav-users] Please help "ERROR: Parse error at line 142: Unknown option Archive"

-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of bryce >Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 1:31 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [Clamav-users] Please help "ERROR: Parse error at line 142: Unknown option Archive" >Here is the error that I am getting. I don't und

RE: [Clamav-users] Re: sendmail devel?

, Virgo Pärna said: > > On Fri, 5 Mar 2004 16:17:45 -0500, Jim Maul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On a (not so) side not, does sendmail support maildirs? I > tried finding the > > > answer to this on the website, but no luck. > > &

RE: [Clamav-users] PB: ClamAV works but doesn't detect viruses

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > Jean-Francois Guilmard > Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 3:08 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Clamav-users] PB: ClamAV works but doesn't detect viruses > > > > Hi guys, > > Clamav is on my serve

RE: [Clamav-users] Re: Simple patch for dealing with password zipfiles

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Eric > Rostetter > Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 2:32 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Re: Simple patch for dealing with password > zipfiles > > > Quoting John Jolet <[EMAIL PROTE

RE: [Clamav-users] Freshclam 0.67 doesn't switch user

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Faejon > Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 1:28 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Clamav-users] Freshclam 0.67 doesn't switch user > > > I upgraded from version 0.65 to 0.67 and now my freshclam wont re

RE: [Clamav-users] Re: Simple patch for dealing with password zip files

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > Jean-Francois Guilmard > Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 1:30 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Clamav-users] Re: Simple patch for dealing with password > zip files > > > What about .html ??? >

[Clamav-users] duh, ignore my last question

my apologies, it was almost 5pm on a friday and for some reason i asked if sendmail supports maildirs. musta been a brain fart cause obviously thats not the mta's job. Feel free to point and laugh. Thanks Jim --- This SF.Net email is sponsore

Re: [Clamav-users] sendmail devel?

> Some "pop3" services work of the system accounts (/etc/passwd) while > others > are database driven and use a "seperate" system. The only thing you need > to > make sure is that the pop3 system your using works on the same level that > your MTA does. qpopper, courier, ipop all seem to work off

RE: [Clamav-users] sendmail devel?

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Hanford, > Seth > Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 3:57 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] sendmail devel? > > > > Why does multiple or single domains matter to the POP3 server? > > The

RE: [Clamav-users] sendmail devel?

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeff > Ramsey > Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 3:47 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] sendmail devel? > > And while we're digging up old hatchets that have been buried long ago, > I u

RE: [Clamav-users] sendmail devel?

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Antony > Stone > Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 3:32 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] sendmail devel? > > > On Friday 05 March 2004 8:22 pm, redragon wrote: > > > This could end up b

RE: [Clamav-users] sendmail devel?

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John > Vestrum > Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 2:05 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] sendmail devel? > > On the other hand, remove sendmail and install Postfix instead. > Forget

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: 5 from testvirus.com came through

> Nigel Horne wrote: > >>On Friday 27 February 2004 10:27 pm, Bryce wrote: >> >> >>>Test # 17, 8, 5, 4, and 2 are making it through. I am using version .65. >>>What can I do to prevent this? >>> >>> >> >>Binhex was added in 0.67, so all binhex encoded e-mails will get through >>unless you upgrade.

RE: [Clamav-users] www.testvirus.org Test #17

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Everton da > Silva Marques > Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 3:21 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Clamav-users] www.testvirus.org Test #17 > > > Hi, > > Can anyone provide hints on how to make > cl

RE: [Clamav-users] ClamAV 0.67 upgrade from.065 doesn't work

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Marc > Brooks > Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 1:37 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: [Clamav-users] ClamAV 0.67 upgrade from.065 doesn't work > > > After upgrading from 0.65 to 0.67 on FreeBSD cla

RE: [Clamav-users] clamd leaking

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Jolet > Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 11:55 AM > To: clamav list > Subject: [Clamav-users] clamd leaking > > > my bad. Turns out it's not clamd leaking. It's kde :) > Got clamd working with pos

RE: [Clamav-users] Segmentation Fault (Again)!

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Philipp > Grosswiler > Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 3:34 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Clamav-users] Segmentation Fault (Again)! > > > Hello Trog. > > > It's likely that a file it is sca

[Clamav-users] Re: Multiple viruses in same file.

-Original Message- From: Virgo Pärna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, 25. Feb 2004 3:01 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Clamav-users] Re: Multiple viruses in same file. On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 09:32:50 +0800, cc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > But wouldn't that waste cpu cycles when

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: Virus List

> On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 17:07:06 +0100 (CET), Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> run "sigtool --list-sigs" >> >> note that the name ClamAV uses for a virus is not always the same that >> some of the other scanners use. > > Thanks all. > > I've just checked the man page for sigtool, and the

RE: [Clamav-users] freshclam as non-privileged user?

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Daniel J > McDonald > Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 8:59 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] freshclam as non-privileged user? > > > On Thu, 2004-

Re: [Clamav-users] freshclam as non-privileged user?

> Prior to upgrading to clamav 0.66, I have been running freshclam with > the same unprivileged user that runs clamd. However, it has stopped > working: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] clamav]$ freshclam > ERROR: LOGGER: Can't open file /var/log/clamav/freshclam.log to write. > ERROR: Problem with internal lo

RE: [Clamav-users] Building RPMS from tarball

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Michael > St. Laurent > Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 12:25 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: [Clamav-users] Building RPMS from tarball > > > Tarjei Knapstad wrote

RE: [Clamav-users] LibClam error while scanning

> On Wednesday 04 Feb 2004 5:52 pm, Jim Maul wrote: > > When trying to scan some messages in my quarantine directory, i > am getting > > the following output: > > > > LibClamAV Warning: Ignoring empty field in " charset=" > > > Anyone have any id

[Clamav-users] LibClam error while scanning

When trying to scan some messages in my quarantine directory, i am getting the following output: LibClamAV Warning: Ignoring empty field in " charset=" This happens with about 5 out of 800 messages. Anyone have any ideas what might be causing this? Thanks. Jim Maul Eastern L

RE: [Clamav-users] MyDoom???

did you try running clamscan with the --mbox option? > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dinko > Ivanov > Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 7:57 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Clamav-users] MyDoom??? > > > Well, but i can not dete

RE: [Clamav-users] sco.a+clamav+qmailscan

Try the --mbox option on clamscan. I was having this problem too. Jim > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of McKeever > Chris > Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 10:42 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Clamav-users] sco.a+clamav+qmailscan

RE: [Clamav-users] Clamdscan problem

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Thomas > Lamy > Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 3:06 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Clamdscan problem > > > Jose R. Ortiz Ubarri wrote: > > > # clamdscan readme.zip > > /root/read

Re: [Clamav-users] Correction to my last post regarding viruses not found

Actually, it technically is clamscan, but for the installation i used (www.qmailrocks.org) a step in there says to copy clamscan to clamdscan so running clamscan and clamdscan effectively means the same thing. So yes technically you are correct, but for my setup, my statement is correct as well.

[Clamav-users] Viruses not detected, Please help.

tried everything that i can think of and it has not helped. Can anyone offer any ideas or insight into this problem? A virus scanner which scans an infected email and tells me its clean is not much help at all. Thank you. Jim Maul Eastern Long Island Hospital 631-477-5417 smime.p7s Description: S

[Clamav-users] Correction to my last post regarding viruses not found

). Hope this of help to the others that are having similar problems. Jim Maul Eastern Long Island Hospital 631-477-5417 smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

RE: [Clamav-users] SCO.a

) Database updated (20580 signatures) from database.clamav.net (207.201.202.73). Everything looks good yet Novarg is NOT detected. Thanks Jim Maul Eastern Long Island Hospital 631-477-5417 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Shawn

RE: [Clamav-users] pretty basic question - clamscan vs clamdscan

clamdscan -> clamdscan.orig and symlink clamdscan to clamscan. This causes qmailscanner to detect clamuko instead of clamscan. So, now im thinking, why was this done? Im not sure if anyone here can answer this, but what is clamuko and why would this be preferred over clamdscan? Thanks. Jim M

<    1   2   3   4   >