Re: [clamav-users] running freshclam and 3rd party/clamav-unofficial-sigs.sh owner name changes occasionally

2021-08-24 Thread Robert Kudyba
> > > On Thu, 15 Jul 2021, Robert Kudyba wrote: > Here we are Aug 24 > >> ... do you have that log? > > > > Uploaded at ... > > Nothing remarkable there. Presumably you're aware of this warning > in that log? > See https://storm.cis.fordham.edu/~

Re: [clamav-users] running freshclam and 3rd party/clamav-unofficial-sigs.sh owner name changes occasionally

2021-07-15 Thread Robert Kudyba
> > here are the logs from 10:01 AM Jul 13: > > Jul 13 10:01:02 storm freshclam[3930506]: Database test passed. > > Jul 13 10:01:02 storm freshclam[3930506]: daily.cld updated (version: > 26230, sigs: 3995778, f-level: 63, builder: raynman) > > Jul 13 10:01:02 storm freshclam[3930506]: daily.cld

Re: [clamav-users] running freshclam and 3rd party/clamav-unofficial-sigs.sh owner name changes occasionally

2021-07-13 Thread Robert Kudyba
> -rw-r--r-- 1 clamav clamav 1438720 Mar 17 10:47 bytecode.cld > -rw-r--r-- 1 clamav clamav293670 Apr 8 06:32 bytecode.cvd > -rw-r--r-- 1 clamav clamav 327757824 Jul 12 09:59 daily.cld > -rw-r--r-- 1 clamav clamav 117859675 Nov 25 2019 main.cvd > > and a bunch of others which we're not

Re: [clamav-users] running freshclam and 3rd party/clamav-unofficial-sigs.sh owner name changes occasionally

2021-07-13 Thread Robert Kudyba
MDEND ([ -x /usr/local/sbin/clamav-unofficial-sigs.sh ] && /usr/bin/bash /usr/local/sbin/clamav-unofficial-sigs.sh) On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 12:31 PM Robert Kudyba wrote: > >> >> > grep clam /etc/passwd >> > clamilt:x:989:985:Clamav Milter >> User:/var/r

Re: [clamav-users] running freshclam and 3rd party/clamav-unofficial-sigs.sh owner name changes occasionally

2021-07-12 Thread Robert Kudyba
> > > > > grep clam /etc/passwd > > clamilt:x:989:985:Clamav Milter User:/var/run/clamav-milter:/sbin/nologin > > clamav:x:985:981::/var/run/clamav:/sbin/nologin > > clamupdate:x:983:979:Clamav database update > user:/var/lib/clamav:/sbin/nologin > > clamscan:x:982:978:Clamav scanner

Re: [clamav-users] running freshclam and 3rd party/clamav-unofficial-sigs.sh owner name changes occasionally

2021-07-12 Thread Robert Kudyba
> > I asked about the permissions on the directories, not on files. In > your 'find' command there you specifically limit the search to files > and not directories with "-type f". See 'man find' for more (but IMO > 'find' is a bit like a cornered rat and I'm starting to think it might > not be

Re: [clamav-users] running freshclam and 3rd party/clamav-unofficial-sigs.sh owner name changes occasionally

2021-07-12 Thread Robert Kudyba
>> /var/log/clam_perms.log ; \ > |> /bin/ls -l /var/lib/clamav >> /var/log/clam_perms.log > OK just set this in cron but I suppose it isn't useful until the problem happens again. On Sun, 11 Jul 2021, Robert Kudyba wrote: > > ls -ld /var/lib/clamav > > > > drw

Re: [clamav-users] running freshclam and 3rd party/clamav-unofficial-sigs.sh owner name changes occasionally

2021-07-11 Thread Robert Kudyba
> > On Sat, 10 Oct 2020, Robert Kudyba wrote: > > > ... next time it happens I can try some of these: > > ... > > But put some logging in place before it does, so you get as precise a > timeline as you can. > > > Here's what the -i option returns: > > .

Re: [clamav-users] false positive on MBL_85256034.UNOFFICIAL with Google Drive links

2021-04-29 Thread Robert Kudyba
> > 1. Is your Perl interpreter in /usr/local/bin/? It's often in usr/bin/. > Thanks I saw that after the fact, indeed /usr/bin in Fedora 2. The environment is likely to be different when the script runs via > freshclam from when it runs at the command line, and it's usually bad > form in

Re: [clamav-users] false positive on MBL_85256034.UNOFFICIAL with Google Drive links

2021-04-29 Thread Robert Kudyba
> > > >> next if > /^MBL_\d+:0:\*:68747470733a2f2f64726976652e676f6f676c652e636f6d$/; > > next if /^MBL_\d+:0:\*:68747470733a2f2f646f63732e676f6f676c652e636f6d$/; > > > > You could do better with a regex, see the excellent Perl documentation. > > > > So what's the syntax to use || (or) with

Re: [clamav-users] false positive on MBL_85256034.UNOFFICIAL with Google Drive links

2021-04-29 Thread Robert Kudyba
> > On Thu, 29 Apr 2021, Olivier via clamav-users wrote: > > Robert Kudyba writes: > > > >> How would you make this work for docs.google.com as well? > >> > >> the following regex corresponds to > https://urldefense.proofpoin

Re: [clamav-users] false positive on MBL_85256034.UNOFFICIAL with Google Drive links

2021-04-29 Thread Robert Kudyba
> > > How would you make this work for docs.google.com as well? > > > > the following regex corresponds to >

Re: [clamav-users] false positive on MBL_85256034.UNOFFICIAL with Google Drive links

2021-04-29 Thread Robert Kudyba
How would you make this work for docs.google.com as well? the following regex corresponds to https://drive.google.com next if /^MBL_\d+:0:\*:68747470733a2f2f64726976652e676f6f676c652e636f6d$/; On Thu, Apr 29, 2021, 12:25 AM Olivier wrote: > Robert, > > In the configuration file user.conf for

Re: [clamav-users] false positive on MBL_85256034.UNOFFICIAL with Google Drive links

2021-04-28 Thread Robert Kudyba
I'd like the script and in our case the link starts with docs.google.com On Wed, Apr 28, 2021, 10:43 PM Olivier via clamav-users < clamav-users@lists.clamav.net> wrote: > Hi, > > Robert Kudyba writes: > > > [1:multipart/alternative Hide] > > > > > > [

[clamav-users] false positive on MBL_85256034.UNOFFICIAL with Google Drive links

2021-04-28 Thread Robert Kudyba
Since the signature name has .UNOFFICIAL and starts with MBL I believe that's Malware Block List. I've submitted a sample to fp (at) malwarepatrol.net. Is more than one sample needed? I'm posting here to let others know and as they don't appear to acknowledge nor reply. Why don't these come up?

[clamav-users] Fwd: [OT] Heuristics.Phishing.Email.SpoofedDomain...

2021-04-20 Thread Robert Kudyba
> Is there an updated convention for this? I believe it's more or less unchanged since version 8.6 of Sendmail > (from the early 1990's). The ID is generated in assign_queueid() in > .../sendmail/queue.c, which uses the integer as an index to the string > "0123456789ABCDEF... you get the picture

[clamav-users] False positive on Heuristics.Phishing.Email.SSL-Spoof, no attachment

2021-04-20 Thread Robert Kudyba
An important email from our university president was quarantined with Heuristics.Phishing.Email.SSL-Spoof. I submitted the email as an attachment to ClamAV. I'm also disabling it based on past reports such as

Re: [clamav-users] Heuristics.Phishing.Email.SpoofedDomain...

2021-04-19 Thread Robert Kudyba
> Hi there, > > On Tue, 13 Apr 2021, Robert Kudyba wrote: > > > So I still don't know what "queue_id" is. > > Try the command > > mailq > > and look in the Sendmail docs. The queue ID is just the filename in > the mail queue directory with

Re: [clamav-users] Heuristics.Phishing.Email.SpoofedDomain...

2021-04-13 Thread Robert Kudyba
> > > Also, with clamav-milter and sendmail. I see that the headers of > quarantined messages go to /var/spool/mqueue with root:smmsp owner/group > permissions and the header of the email starts with hf whilst the body of > the message starts with df. So the message in question looks like this: >

Re: [clamav-users] Heuristics.Phishing.Email.SpoofedDomain...

2021-04-13 Thread Robert Kudyba
I'm seeing a FP from a Delta Airlines email. Also, with clamav-milter and sendmail. I see that the headers of quarantined messages go to /var/spool/mqueue with root:smmsp owner/group permissions and the header of the email starts with hf whilst the body of the message starts with df. So the

[clamav-users] false positive on MBL_82485625.UNOFFICIAL for Google Drive links sent as attachments

2021-03-24 Thread Robert Kudyba
Using clamav-milter 0.103.1 with sendmail on Fedora 33, we had several emails quarantined with the MBL_82485625.UNOFFICIAL. All they contained was a link forwarded as an attachment of a Google Drive folder. I reported this to the false positive at SaneSecurity address. I also added the signature

Re: [clamav-users] running freshclam and 3rd party/clamav-unofficial-sigs.sh owner name changes occasionally

2020-10-09 Thread Robert Kudyba
> > > Oct 09 04:15:56 Checking for urlhaus updates... > > Oct 09 04:15:56 Checking for updated urlhaus database file: urlhaus.ndb > > Oct 09 04:15:56 Testing updated urlhaus database file: urlhaus.ndb > > Oct 09 04:15:56 Clamscan reports urlhaus urlhaus.ndb database integrity > tested good > > Oct

Re: [clamav-users] running freshclam and 3rd party/clamav-unofficial-sigs.sh owner name changes occasionally

2020-10-09 Thread Robert Kudyba
permissions before running it, > or run another script before invocations of the update script so that > the permissions are set first, or hack the update script itself. You > could even use 'chattr' to make the permissions unchangeable. > Yeah I've used the chattr option in other are

Re: [clamav-users] running freshclam and 3rd party/clamav-unofficial-sigs.sh owner name changes occasionally

2020-10-09 Thread Robert Kudyba
> > > Every few weeks I'll start seeing this error: > > > > ERROR: clam database directory (clam_dbs) not writable /var/lib/clamav > > > > Running this fixes it: > > su clamav -s '/usr/local/sbin/clamav-unofficial-sigs.sh' > > > > Here are the files not owned by clamav: > > -rw-r--r-- 1

[clamav-users] running freshclam and 3rd party/clamav-unofficial-sigs.sh owner name changes occasionally

2020-10-09 Thread Robert Kudyba
Running ClamAV 103.0-1 on Fedora, I have freshclam and clamav-unofficial-sigs.sh from https://github.com/extremeshok/clamav-unofficial-sigs Every few weeks I'll start seeing this error: ERROR: clam database directory (clam_dbs) not writable /var/lib/clamav Running this fixes it: su clamav -s

[clamav-users] create /var/run/clamav on reboot in Fedora, otherwise Pulseaudio errors occur

2020-08-05 Thread Robert Kudyba
Using Fedora 31, this has been happening for quite a while. After reboot /var/run/clamav is removed, which is expected. However, wehn ClamAV was installed the user created in /etc/passwd looks like this: clamav:x:985:981::/var/run/clamav:/sbin/nologin So Pulseaudio tries to create the following

Re: [clamav-users] Clamd crashes frequently - macOS Catalina

2020-05-01 Thread Robert Kudyba
Nice On Fri, May 1, 2020, 9:38 PM James Brown via clamav-users < clamav-users@lists.clamav.net> wrote: > On 1 May 2020, at 8:31 pm, Mark Allan via clamav-users < > clamav-users@lists.clamav.net> wrote: > > > Try excluding Email.Exploit.Efail-6641027-1 from the main ClamAV set. > > > Thanks Mark.

[clamav-users] Logwatch not showing "Viruses detected"

2019-10-30 Thread Robert Kudyba
This might be off topic to the list. We have Clam AV running on Fedora 30 with clamav-milter, clamav-0.101.4-1.fc30.x86_64, and sendmail. On one server the logwatch emails do send a daily recap as desired such as this stanza: - Clamav Begin Viruses

Re: [clamav-users] Install error on Fedora 30

2019-08-09 Thread Robert Kudyba
You have to wait for the Fedora maintainers to update it, usually takes a week or so. On Fri, Aug 9, 2019, 11:41 AM Cliff Hayes via clamav-users < clamav-users@lists.clamav.net> wrote: > I took advice given and used dnf to install clamd and clamav. > But now I am getting the errors: > > WARNING:

Re: [clamav-users] ***Spam 3.041*** clamd using 100% CPU in Fedora 30 with sendmail & clamav-milter, : Probe for slot 1 returned: failed

2019-07-31 Thread Robert Kudyba
ne file per signature. I wonder if any > of the unofficial databases have similar efforts to keep the volume and > quality of signatures in check. > > > > Regards, > > Micah > > > > *From: *clamav-users on behalf of > Robert Kudyba > *Reply-To: *C

Re: [clamav-users] ***Spam 3.041*** clamd using 100% CPU in Fedora 30 with sendmail & clamav-milter, : Probe for slot 1 returned: failed

2019-07-31 Thread Robert Kudyba
e > keeps growing and clamd loading time with it. > > But it's really an issue with older machines like the one I have here. :D > > Good luck! > Reio > > > On 30/07/2019 23:30, Robert Kudyba wrote: >> I did but then I also increased from 600 to 900 and that

Re: [clamav-users] ***Spam 3.041*** clamd using 100% CPU in Fedora 30 with sendmail & clamav-milter, : Probe for slot 1 returned: failed

2019-07-30 Thread Robert Kudyba
when loading the signatures. > > Good luck! > Reio > > > On 30.07.2019 21:58, Robert Kudyba wrote: > > rpm -qa clamav-milter > clamav-milter-0.101.2-2.fc30.x86_64 > rpm -qa clamd > clamd-0.101.2-2.fc30.x86_64 > > See some logs and statuses below. clamd tak

[clamav-users] clamd using 100% CPU in Fedora 30 with sendmail & clamav-milter, : Probe for slot 1 returned: failed

2019-07-30 Thread Robert Kudyba
rpm -qa clamav-milter clamav-milter-0.101.2-2.fc30.x86_64 rpm -qa clamd clamd-0.101.2-2.fc30.x86_64 See some logs and statuses below. clamd takes up all of the CPU. clamd does appear to start based on the ps command but you can see the status shows no running; PID USER PR NIVIRT

Re: [clamav-users] sendmail w clamav-milter stops errors with: write(D) returned -1, expected 23: Broken pipe, Fedora 29

2019-01-09 Thread Robert Kudyba
> > sm-client.service: Failed to parse PID from file /run/sm-client.pid: > Invalid argument > > I'm not too familiar with sendmail client, so I'll defer this to someone > else more knowledgeable. > A bug that won't get fixed? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748171 Anyways any idea

[clamav-users] sendmail w clamav-milter stops errors with: write(D) returned -1, expected 23: Broken pipe, Fedora 29

2019-01-09 Thread Robert Kudyba
clamav-0.101.0-3.fc29.x86_64 clamd-0.101.0-3.fc29.x86_64 clamav-milter-0.101.0-3.fc29.x86_64 sendmail-8.15.2-29.fc29.x86_64 4.19.13-300.fc29.x86_64 Milter (clamav-milter): write(D) returned -1, expected 23: Broken pipe Also seeing errors like: clamd[25994]: LibClamAV Error:

Re: [clamav-users] clamav-milter with sendmail on Fedora 28: init failed to open, to error state, initialization failed, temp failing commands

2018-07-30 Thread Robert Kudyba
> Jul 23 11:45:39 storm clamd[22351]: LibClamAV Error: yyerror(): >> /var/lib/clamav/packer.yar line 82 undefined identifier "pe" >> > > remove yar rules > > clamav is unstable with yara, google it > Yes just found

Re: [clamav-users] clamav-milter with sendmail on Fedora 28: init failed to open, to error state, initialization failed, temp failing commands

2018-07-30 Thread Robert Kudyba
mav-m ilter/clamav-milter.socket,F=T,T=S:4m;R:4m;E:10m')dnl What's the difference between `clamav-milter' vs `clamav' in that line? On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 11:51 AM, Robert Kudyba wrote: > However I still get these errors in sendmail: >>> Milter: data, reject=451 4.3.2 Please

Re: [clamav-users] clamav-milter with sendmail on Fedora 28: init failed to open, to error state, initialization failed, temp failing commands

2018-07-23 Thread Robert Kudyba
> > However I still get these errors in sendmail: >> Milter: data, reject=451 4.3.2 Please try again later >> > > the syslog entry should give us more information. > Jul 23 11:45:33 storm systemd[1]: clamd@scan.service: Main process exited, code=killed, status=6/A BRT Jul 23 11:45:33 storm

Re: [clamav-users] clamav-milter with sendmail on Fedora 28: init failed to open, to error state, initialization failed, temp failing commands

2018-07-17 Thread Robert Kudyba
t 12:27 PM, Micah Snyder (micasnyd) < micas...@cisco.com> wrote: > What are your current user/group ownership and permissions on: > /var/run/clamd.scan/clamd.sock ? > > Regards, > Micah > > > Micah Snyder > ClamAV Development > Talos > Cisco Systems, Inc. &g

Re: [clamav-users] clamav-milter with sendmail on Fedora 28: init failed to open, to error state, initialization failed, temp failing commands

2018-07-16 Thread Robert Kudyba
rds, > Micah > > > Micah Snyder > ClamAV Development > Talos > Cisco Systems, Inc. > > > On Jul 16, 2018, at 12:19 PM, Robert Kudyba wrote: > > I set: > MilterSocketGroup clamscan > User clamscan > > Still getting the permission denied. > > Note the

Re: [clamav-users] clamav-milter with sendmail on Fedora 28: init failed to open, to error state, initialization failed, temp failing commands

2018-07-16 Thread Robert Kudyba
Development > Talos > Cisco Systems, Inc. > > > On Jul 16, 2018, at 11:06 AM, Robert Kudyba wrote: > > Thanks Micah, now getting a different error: > Jul 16 10:59:23 storm clamav-milter[32079]: ClamAV: Unable to remove > /var/run/clamd.scan/clamd.sock: Permission deni

Re: [clamav-users] clamav-milter with sendmail on Fedora 28: init failed to open, to error state, initialization failed, temp failing commands

2018-07-16 Thread Robert Kudyba
run/clamd.scan/clamd.sock > > Lines in /etc/clamd.d/scan.conf > > TCPSocket 3310 > TCPAddr 127.0.0.1 > > You should use only 1 ( TCP _or_ Unix/Local ) socket for clamd. We > recommend using Unix/Local sockets. > > > Micah Snyder > ClamAV Development > T

Re: [clamav-users] clamav-milter with sendmail on Fedora 28: init failed to open, to error state, initialization failed, temp failing commands

2018-07-12 Thread Robert Kudyba
r daemon. What else can I check? On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 7:24 PM, Kees Theunissen wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jul 2018, Robert Kudyba wrote: > > >Hello hive, > > > >Running: > >clamav-0.100.0-2.fc28.x86_64 > > > >clamd, freshclam and clamav-milter all up a

[clamav-users] clamav-milter with sendmail on Fedora 28: init failed to open, to error state, initialization failed, temp failing commands

2018-07-10 Thread Robert Kudyba
Hello hive, Running: clamav-0.100.0-2.fc28.x86_64 clamd, freshclam and clamav-milter all up and running: ps -auwx | grep clam clamupd+ 20336 0.0 0.0 50672 4016 ?Ss Jun29 1:15 /usr/bin/freshclam -d -c 4 clamav 23713 0.0 0.0 176780 1160 ?Ssl 13:23 0:00

[Clamav-users] error on make in OS X/Jaguar clamav-0.70-rc

2004-03-30 Thread Robert Kudyba
Any idea how to fix this? Happens on a make... ld: table of contents for archive: /usr/lib/libbz2.a is out of date; rerun ranlib(1) (can't load from it) make[2]: *** [clamscan] Error 1 make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make: *** [all] Error 2