OK, I'm pretty certain that field 5 of the DNS response is a flag indicating
that a warning should be issued if the engine is out-of-date. It's currently
set to "1". What happens if you change that value to indicate that the warning
should not be issued?
-Al-
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 03:52 AM,
It’s not a service we can turn off. This is a string match.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 13, 2018, at 19:17, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
> If they are relying on it, it'd be a service to turn it off until 0.101.1 is
> released.
>
> Scott K
>
>> On Thursday, December 13, 2018 06:49:08 PM
If they are relying on it, it'd be a service to turn it off until 0.101.1 is
released.
Scott K
On Thursday, December 13, 2018 06:49:08 PM Joel Esler wrote:
> ClamAV cannot control when the package distros update their packages. Also,
> some of the package maintainers, I suspect, rely on
As memory serves, there used to be a code number that represented the necessity
to upgrade. Many years ago they used to wait several days/weeks before turning
that up on routine updates, which then caused the warnings to show up.
-Al-
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 09:35 AM, Micah Snyder (micasnyd)
ClamAV cannot control when the package distros update their packages. Also,
some of the package maintainers, I suspect, rely on updates like that to tell
them when they need to go update packages.
> On Dec 13, 2018, at 12:28 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
> Would it be possible to turn off the
Scott Kitterman skrev den 2018-12-13 18:28:
Would it be possible to turn off the outdated warning until that
happens?
why ?
___
clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
It, unfortunately, is not. If we did, then users who have installed from
source will see the outdated warning. The warning is a dumb string-compare,
and doesn't actually compare the integer values in the version string.
Micah Snyder
ClamAV Development
Talos
Cisco Systems, Inc.
On Dec 13,
Would it be possible to turn off the outdated warning until that happens?
Scott K
On December 13, 2018 3:02:59 PM UTC, "Micah Snyder (micasnyd)"
wrote:
>Because of the libclamav header issue I disclosed last week, most
>package managers are holding off on packaging 0.101.0. Some projects
>that
That's the exact issue Cisco warned about. Hopefully we see a 0.101.1 soon.
Scott K
On December 13, 2018 3:56:55 PM UTC, Paul Kosinski
wrote:
>Yeah, I tried to build the latest (i.e. rather old) HAVP against
>0.101.0 and it failed due to missing cltypes.h. I haven't had time to
>look into
Yeah, I tried to build the latest (i.e. rather old) HAVP against
0.101.0 and it failed due to missing cltypes.h. I haven't had time to
look into this -- rather expected -- problem.
On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 02:54:08 -0500
Scott Kitterman wrote:
> A larger issue in this case is that 0.100.0, as
Because of the libclamav header issue I disclosed last week, most package
managers are holding off on packaging 0.101.0. Some projects that rely on
ClamAV will be unable to build with the new libclamav version until ClamAV
0.101.1 is published (and until they update to use the API changes).
We
Kaushal Shriyan skrev den 2018-12-13 07:30:
I am running CentOS Linux release 7.6.1810 (Core) with ClamAV
installed. When i am running freshclam i am seeing a Warning message
and the details are described below:-
WARNING: Local version: 0.100.2 Recommended version: 0.101.0
DON'T PANIC! Read
Sorry, that's the version I meant, 0.101.0
Thanks for noticing,
Scott K
On Thursday, December 13, 2018 08:12:32 AM Robert Chalmers wrote:
> I saw this myself last week, so downloaded the new sources and built ->
> installed them myself. No problems and no warnings now.
>
> 0.101.0 is the
I saw this myself last week, so downloaded the new sources and built ->
installed them myself. No problems and no warnings now.
0.101.0 is the latest stable version
robert
> On 13 Dec 2018, at 07:54, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
> A larger issue in this case is that 0.100.0, as released is not
A larger issue in this case is that 0.100.0, as released is not suitable for
distribution use to to shared library header issues (mentioned on this list a
few days ago - I appreciate Cisco being forthcoming and warning people). I
don't know what EPEL/CentOS will do, but 0.100.0 won't be in
Issue is in CentOS repo (not sure if standard or EPEL additional repo)
that, still, do not ship the latest stable.
On this topic, AMZ Linux is still have 0.99 in standard repo
Luca
Il 13/12/2018 07:42, Al Varnell ha scritto:
Not sure what comment you are looking for. The warning is pretty
Hi,
I am running CentOS Linux release 7.6.1810 (Core) with ClamAV installed.
When i am running freshclam i am seeing a Warning message and the details
are described below:-
# freshclam
ClamAV update process started at Thu Dec 13 11:49:18 2018
WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED!
Hello,
you are running an older clamav version (Local version: 0.88.7 Recommended
version: 0.90.1). Nothing to worry about.
On 3/5/07, Morgan Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am running Debian Sarge and I keep getting this message:
Received signal: wake up
ClamAV update
O.K. Will apt ever upgrade to a new version for me, or will I have to do
it manually?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miroslav
Strugarevic
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 12:08 PM
To: ClamAV users ML
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV
:
O.K. Will apt ever upgrade to a new version for me, or will I have to do
it manually?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miroslav
Strugarevic
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 12:08 PM
To: ClamAV users ML
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV
: [Clamav-users] ClamAV installation is OUTDATED!
Hello,
you are running an older clamav version (Local version: 0.88.7
Recommended
version: 0.90.1). Nothing to worry about.
I wonder if anyone ever reads the admonishments about top-posting and
pruning messages.
dp
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miroslav
Strugarevic
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 12:22 PM
To: ClamAV users ML
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV installation is OUTDATED!
You could try apt-get install ClamAV or whatever is on Debian. It's sure
safer to run newer version for security fixes
Hi,
WARNING: Local version: 0.88.7 Recommended version: 0.90.1
My /etc/apt/source.list contains the following:
deb http://ftp2.de.debian.org/debian-volatile sarge/volatile main
Yeah. Due to a ABI Change in ClamAV 0.90 the debian-volatile team
currently needs to backport a few
On 3/5/07, Morgan Walker wrote:
Yeah, apt-get install clamav just gives me:
clamav is already the newest version.
Not sure what else to do, might have to remove ClamAV all together and
manually install the newer version. Or just wait to see if apt does it
on down the road.
Probably Debian
Morgan Walker wrote:
Yeah, apt-get install clamav just gives me:
clamav is already the newest version.
Not sure what else to do,
Visit www.clamav.net, download the source and install from there. 5-10 mins,
less
time than it takes you to read and reply to all these emails ;-)
--
Nigel
Awesome, thanks!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin
Zobel-Helas
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 12:00 PM
To: ClamAV users ML
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV installation is OUTDATED!
Hi,
WARNING: Local version: 0.88.7 Recommended
Dennis Peterson wrote:
I wonder if anyone ever reads the admonishments about top-posting and
pruning messages.
Or the FAQ. Or the manual. I really wish people would do their homework
before posting to this mailing list.
-R
___
Help us build a
On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 09:23:33 -0800
Dennis Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder if anyone ever reads the admonishments about top-posting and
pruning messages.
They read it, they just choose to ignore it. It is for that reason that
I will usually only reply to a top-poster once and then
Hi,
available now.
On Mon Mar 05, 2007 at 12:35:12 -0500, Morgan Walker wrote:
Awesome, thanks!
Hi,
WARNING: Local version: 0.88.7 Recommended version: 0.90.1
My /etc/apt/source.list contains the following:
deb http://ftp2.de.debian.org/debian-volatile sarge/volatile
Hello Ralph,
I wonder if anyone ever reads the admonishments about top-posting and
pruning messages.
Or the FAQ. Or the manual. I really wish people would do their homework
before posting to this mailing list.
I think it'd be better to point such users to a proper URL where they
can *find
On 3/6/07, Luca Gibelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it'd be better to point such users to a proper URL where they
can *find the answer* instead of serving the answer to them directly via
email.
This will increase the probability that next time they need some info,
they will *first* search
A few days ago, I saw that the wrong f level was published in a cvd.
http://lurker.clamav.net/message/20061103.221240.b49f234b.en.html
However, I am still getting that message. Does anyone know if it is still safe
to ignore?
I don't want to be a pain - but can anyone confirm or deny that
Hello Little,
http://lurker.clamav.net/message/20061103.221240.b49f234b.en.html
However, I am still getting that message. Does anyone know if it is still
safe to ignore?
I don't want to be a pain - but can anyone confirm or deny that they are
also seeing these messages? I have gone
A few days ago, I saw that the wrong f level was published in a cvd.
http://lurker.clamav.net/message/20061103.221240.b49f234b.en.html
However, I am still getting that message. Does anyone know if it is still
safe to ignore?
-
Everyone is raving
If you read the list archive you'll discover this comes up
regularly, and the answer is always the same.
And no, I'm not supplying the answer :-)
I had the same problem your having - if you are still having issues -
search for the subject ClamAV Install dated 21/01 24/01
This will give
Hi Mal,
That was just the info i was looking for!
I searched your threat and found out i had some libs left in /usr/local/lib
After removing them the situation is back to normal.
Thanks again!
Grz. Johan
Op zondag 6 februari 2005 15:55, schreef Mal Herring:
If you read the list archive you'll
Hi Mal,
That was just the info i was looking for!
I searched your threat and found out i had some libs left in
/usr/local/lib After removing them the situation is back to normal.
Thanks again!
Glad to have helped, thanks is also due to Rob MacGregor who originally
helped me.
Hi all,
I updated clamav0.80 to 0.81 with the SuSE9.2 binarie rpm's.
I still got messages from freshclam saying that i should update to 0.81.
After that i totally erased everything which smelled like clamav and
reinstalled the rpm's but still the same message.
Can anyone enlighten me where
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 10:30:53 +0100, Johan Barelds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I updated clamav0.80 to 0.81 with the SuSE9.2 binarie rpm's.
I still got messages from freshclam saying that i should update to 0.81.
If you read the list archive you'll discover this comes up regularly,
and
39 matches
Mail list logo
