Re: [Clamav-users] Correction to my last post regarding viruses not found

2004-01-31 Thread Thomas Lamy
Jim Maul wrote: Actually, it technically is clamscan, but for the installation i used (www.qmailrocks.org) a step in there says to copy clamscan to clamdscan so running clamscan and clamdscan effectively means the same thing. So yes technically you are correct, but for my setup, my statement is

Re: [Clamav-users] Correction to my last post regarding viruses not found

2004-01-30 Thread Trog
Quoting Jim Maul [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Actually, it technically is clamscan, but for the installation i used (www.qmailrocks.org) a step in there says to copy clamscan to clamdscan Arrr! Why are they advising to do such a stupid thing. so running clamscan and clamdscan effectively means the

Re: [Clamav-users] Correction to my last post regarding viruses not found

2004-01-29 Thread Jim Maul
Actually, it technically is clamscan, but for the installation i used (www.qmailrocks.org) a step in there says to copy clamscan to clamdscan so running clamscan and clamdscan effectively means the same thing. So yes technically you are correct, but for my setup, my statement is correct as well.

Re: [Clamav-users] Correction to my last post regarding viruses not found

2004-01-28 Thread José THOMAS
Hi all, I think you should say clamscan with --mbox because I haven't found --mbox flag for clamdscan isn't it? Nevertheless if a similar flag exist flag exist for clamdscan (0.65 release) I will be very interrested in. Best regards, Jose THOMAS. Le 28 janv. 04, à 16:47, Jim Maul a écrit :