Julio Canto wrote:
Bill Randle wrote:
Dave P wrote:
Are there any independent tests out there that do not
paint such a bleak picture? Are there any plans to
submit ClamAV or ClamWin to Virus Bulletin?
[...]
I think a better test is side-by-side comparisons with standard,
commercial, products. If
sam wun wrote:
Hi, how do you make ClamAV update virus database as soon as possible
when the signature becomes ready?
Sam.
Polling frequently the online versions. This subject were allready
discussed in the list some months ago.
--
Regards,
Julio Canto
Hispasec Sistemas
On 10/21/2004 1:21 AM +0200, Dave P wrote:
I am trying to convince my company to switch to open
source where possible. It is much easier if the
software has been evaluated by an independent group.
Unfortunately, reviews that I could find, including
GMX Systematic and Heise magazines, were
Hi
Niek wrote:
On 10/21/2004 1:21 AM +0200, Dave P wrote:
I am trying to convince my company to switch to open
source where possible. It is much easier if the
software has been evaluated by an independent group.
Unfortunately, reviews that I could find, including
GMX Systematic and Heise
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 09:38:49AM +0200, Bogusaw Brandys wrote:
Right.Put ClamAV on front and commercial scanner on back ;-)
ClamAV do not recognize many polymorphic malwares, but today there are
not so many such malwares ;-)
Too right - that describes exactly how Qmail-Scanner utilizes
Hi, how do you make ClamAV update virus database as soon as possible
when the signature becomes ready?
Sam.
[Mitch (bitblock)]
Sam. Bad toad! Don't hijack threads.
You can run freshclam - there is no such thing as an instant update - the
latest version uses DNS records to allow more
Are there any independent tests out there that do not paint such a bleak
picture? Are there any plans to submit ClamAV or ClamWin to Virus
Bulletin?
Want stats? We employ clam, uvscan (McAfee/NAI) and bdc. Clam is much
faster because of clamd so it is first. Here is the breakdown in order
I am trying to convince my company to switch to open
source where possible. It is much easier if the
software has been evaluated by an independent group.
Unfortunately, reviews that I could find, including
GMX Systematic and Heise magazines, were negative. The
opinion seemed to be summed up by
Dave P wrote:
I am trying to convince my company to switch to open
source where possible. It is much easier if the
software has been evaluated by an independent group.
Unfortunately, reviews that I could find, including
GMX Systematic and Heise magazines, were negative. The
opinion seemed to be
Bill Randle wrote:
Dave P wrote:
Are there any independent tests out there that do not
paint such a bleak picture? Are there any plans to
submit ClamAV or ClamWin to Virus Bulletin?
[...]
I think a better test is side-by-side comparisons with standard,
commercial, products. If you search the
10 matches
Mail list logo
