[Clamav-users] Re: Clamscan -m segfault , possibly a big problem

2004-02-16 Thread Starbane
Tomasz Papszun wrote: On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 at 22:34:09 -0700, Starbane wrote: [...] --- SCAN SUMMARY --- Known viruses: 41374 ^ You've got some superfluous database files. There are only 20718 signatures currently. Maybe you've got old format database files

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: Clamscan -m segfault , possibly a big problem

2004-02-16 Thread Tomasz Papszun
On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 at 3:10:48 -0700, Starbane wrote: Tomasz Papszun wrote: On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 at 22:34:09 -0700, Starbane wrote: --- SCAN SUMMARY --- Known viruses: 41374 ^ You've got some superfluous database files. There are only 20718 signatures

[Clamav-users] Re: Clamscan -m segfault , possibly a big problem

2004-02-15 Thread Starbane
After compiling 0.67, the segfault has gone away. After I wiped the egg off my face, I felt much better. Kudos to the ClamAV project team once again! :) --- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps