Re: [Clamav-users] Re: password-protected Worm.Bagle.F

2004-03-02 Thread Tomasz Papszun
On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 at 21:04:55 -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote: Is the zip file really encrypted, or is the password just an Really. advisory flag that an unzip tool is supposed to honor? If its the latter, then clamav could just ignore the password to unpack and scan the archive

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: password-protected Worm.Bagle.F

2004-03-02 Thread Tomasz Papszun
On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 at 3:38:32 -0500, jef moskot wrote: On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Tomasz Papszun wrote: So please folks, stop submitting encrypted zip files (without a full message) to us as it's quite impossible to create a signature for them. Does this mean you still want samples including

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: password-protected Worm.Bagle.F

2004-03-02 Thread jef moskot
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Tomasz Papszun wrote: As usually: only if ClamAV with an up-to-date database isn't detecting an infection in a sample. In this particular case a sample = a full message sample. Roger that. Up until a few minutes ago, a few samples had gotten through, but things look good

[Clamav-users] Re: password-protected Worm.Bagle.F

2004-03-02 Thread Derrick 'dman' Hudson
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 09:37:48AM +0100, Tomasz Papszun wrote: | On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 at 21:04:55 -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote: | | Is the zip file really encrypted, or is the password just an | | Really. Oh, ok. I guess zip files can be more secure than I assumed at first. -D -- I

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: password-protected Worm.Bagle.F

2004-03-02 Thread B.K. DeLong
At 10:04 AM 3/2/2004 +0100, Tomasz Papszun wrote: As usually: only if ClamAV with an up-to-date database isn't detecting an infection in a sample. In this particular case a sample = a full message sample. OK - I am still receiving emails containing a PW-protected zip with this virus. Should I

RE: [Clamav-users] Re: password-protected Worm.Bagle.F

2004-03-02 Thread Diego d'Ambra
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:clamav-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of B.K. DeLong Sent: 2. marts 2004 17:06 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Re: password-protected Worm.Bagle.F OK - I am still receiving emails containing a PW-protected

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: password-protected Worm.Bagle.F

2004-03-02 Thread Tomasz Papszun
On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 at 11:05:53 -0500, B.K. DeLong wrote: At 10:04 AM 3/2/2004 +0100, Tomasz Papszun wrote: As usually: only if ClamAV with an up-to-date database isn't detecting an infection in a sample. In this particular case a sample = a full message sample. OK - I am still receiving

[Clamav-users] Re: password-protected Worm.Bagle.F

2004-03-01 Thread Toorop
Bill Taroli, BT Perhaps a silly question... if the .ZIP attachment is passworded, how BT are the target users supposed to be opening them and getting infected? BT Has the password been included in the email in which the .ZIP was attached? Perhaps the password is in the message : Open my

[Clamav-users] Re: password-protected Worm.Bagle.F

2004-03-01 Thread Derrick 'dman' Hudson
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 09:06:12PM +0100, Erik Corry wrote: | On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 05:31:35PM +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: | Bill Taroli wrote: | However, judging from the fact that it IS spreading in my network now, | some people tend to do exactly that. | | Kaspersky have added the