RE: [Clamav-users] Segmentation Fault (Again Again)!

2004-03-01 Thread Trog
On Sun, 2004-02-29 at 17:55, Philipp Grosswiler wrote: OK, now I got something for you... but could be that the problem is already solved in the latest CVS version... just that the latest CVS is not working for me (see my earlier post about readdb()). (gdb) continue Continuing. [New

RE: [Clamav-users] Segmentation Fault (Again Again)!

2004-03-01 Thread Trog
On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 10:37, Philipp Grosswiler wrote: Hello Trog. The libpthread thread manager seg faulted. I've never seen that happen before. I guess that would be either a bug in libpthread or some very bad memory corruption somewhere. Well, this happened about 2-3 times

Re: [Clamav-users] Segmentation Fault (Again Again)!

2004-03-01 Thread Loren Salsgiver
Set your thread timeout to zero. Setting this to any other value causes users with dialup connections to timeout while sending attachments, in addition my seg faults are gone. This is the best reason to do this, I've been running for 4 days now without a single crash, previoiusly I was

Re: [Clamav-users] Segmentation Fault (Again Again)!

2004-03-01 Thread Trog
On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 14:04, Loren Salsgiver wrote: Set your thread timeout to zero. Setting this to any other value causes users with dialup connections to timeout while sending attachments, in addition my seg faults are gone. This is the best reason to do this, I've been running for 4

RE: [Clamav-users] Segmentation Fault (Again Again)!

2004-03-01 Thread Trog
On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 10:37, Philipp Grosswiler wrote: Well, this happened about 2-3 times (before, I was not able to use gdb). But I am using the current CVS snapshot (20040229) and it is working great until now. I didn't have any crashes since then. Could be that it is already solved in this

RE: [Clamav-users] Segmentation Fault (Again Again)!

2004-02-29 Thread Philipp Grosswiler
OK, now I got something for you... but could be that the problem is already solved in the latest CVS version... just that the latest CVS is not working for me (see my earlier post about readdb()). 3. Wait for a seg fault. Then issue the backtrace command. That happened right now. 4. If may

[Clamav-users] Segmentation Fault (Again Again)!

2004-02-27 Thread Philipp Grosswiler
OK, this is the last time I will post about the occurance of this problem: Thu Feb 26 23:57:01 2004 - stream: Worm.SomeFool FOUND Thu Feb 26 23:57:12 2004 - Segmentation fault :-( Bye.. Fri Feb 27 00:23:42 2004 - SelfCheck: Database status OK. Fri Feb 27 00:37:08 2004 - ERROR: accept() failed Fri

Re: [Clamav-users] Segmentation Fault (Again Again)!

2004-02-27 Thread Trog
On Fri, 2004-02-27 at 07:59, Philipp Grosswiler wrote: OK, this is the last time I will post about the occurance of this problem: Thu Feb 26 23:57:01 2004 - stream: Worm.SomeFool FOUND Thu Feb 26 23:57:12 2004 - Segmentation fault :-( Bye.. Fri Feb 27 00:23:42 2004 - SelfCheck: Database

RE: [Clamav-users] Segmentation Fault (Again Again)!

2004-02-27 Thread Philipp Grosswiler
Hello Trog. In order to track this problem down, we would need you to do the following: 1. Run clamd in debug mode: /usr/local/sbin/clamd --debug 2. Attach gdb to the running clamd process gdb /usr/local/sbin/clamd process id then in gdb, issue the command

RE: [Clamav-users] Segmentation Fault (Again Again)!

2004-02-27 Thread Trog
On Fri, 2004-02-27 at 13:32, Philipp Grosswiler wrote: Hello Trog. In order to track this problem down, we would need you to do the following: 1. Run clamd in debug mode: /usr/local/sbin/clamd --debug 2. Attach gdb to the running clamd process gdb