On Thursday 08 of April 2004 02:11, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Wed, 7 Apr 2004 01:57:23 +0200
For a very simple mail scanner the (b) solution seems to be the best
IMHO.
Well, anyway it would be great, if someday ClamAV distribution includes
something like libclamdclient. Looking at clamdscan
Hi!
I'm about to include clamavis support in our very simple mail scanner. My
first idea was to use libclamav for that, however my filter will be
integrated with our mail server in the way that it will be spawned for each
mail.
For obvious performance reason I'd like to use clamd, but I've
On Wed, 7 Apr 2004 01:57:23 +0200
Przemyslaw Wegrzyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I'm about to include clamavis support in our very simple mail scanner.
My first idea was to use libclamav for that, however my filter will be
integrated with our mail server in the way that it will be
Quoting Philipp Grosswiler [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
So, how is clamd behaving with the patch and ThreadTimout=0?
Is it any better?
It is actually better, but unfortunately, there still seems to be a
problem
somewhere.
If you have can put an accurate time on when clamd stopped responding,
So, how is clamd behaving with the patch and ThreadTimout=0?
Is it any better?
It is actually better, but unfortunately, there still seems to be a problem
somewhere. Here is what gdb shows me:
GNU gdb 5.3.92
Copyright 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the
Quoting Philipp Grosswiler [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thank you for the patch, I will apply it and re-compile clamd.
So, how is clamd behaving with the patch and ThreadTimout=0?
Is it any better?
Cheers,
-trog
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored
So, how is clamd behaving with the patch and ThreadTimout=0?
Is it any better?
Yes, indeed. It didn't crash since one day now. I will continue to observe.
Regards,
Phil.
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere
Quoting Philipp Grosswiler [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
OK, clamd already crashed once again, and now I was trying to follow
your
guide...
(I'm going to assume you're clamd is multithreaded. If not
just do steps 1-3 followed by the command 'bt').
I think so, how can I tell?
clamd will be
clamd will be linked against libpthread, the command 'ldd
/usr/local/sbin/clamd' should so this.
The command shows the following output:
libclamav.so.1 = /usr/local/lib/libclamav.so.1 (0x4001a000)
libz.so.1 = /lib/libz.so.1 (0x4003c000)
libbz2.so.1 =
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 09:49:22 + (GMT)
Trog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gale]$ clamdscan .
/home/gale/./.mozilla/default/5bc4ycs6.slt/Cache/_CACHE_002_:
Eicar-Test-Signature FOUND
Session(0): Time out ERROR
Timed out after 3 seconds! Thats not right.
There was a race
Quoting Tomasz Kojm [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 09:49:22 + (GMT)
Trog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gale]$ clamdscan .
/home/gale/./.mozilla/default/5bc4ycs6.slt/Cache/_CACHE_002_:
Eicar-Test-Signature FOUND
Session(0): Time out ERROR
Timed out after 3
Quoting Tomasz Kojm [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 09:49:22 + (GMT)
Trog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gale]$ clamdscan .
/home/gale/./.mozilla/default/5bc4ycs6.slt/Cache/_CACHE_002_:
Eicar-Test-Signature FOUND
Session(0): Time out ERROR
Timed out after 3
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:45:20 + (GMT)
Trog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Tomasz Kojm [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Your patch is incorrect. It will always be true for threads that
are currently in use and they will instantly be killed.
I disagree. The patch does the same thing that
I would like to know how I can remotely restart the clamd server... or
actually kill all the processes.
It happens that clamd sometimes is not working correctly anymore, but I can
still remotely access it and send commands. I am using clamd (running on
Linux) to scan the mail server (running on
What version are you running?
ClamAV 0.65
A number of people have reported this issue and it has
resulted in scripts being written that check the status of
clamd periodically and restart it.
I heard about that, but I was asking about doing this remotely, since spamd
itself is actually
Quoting Philipp Grosswiler [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
However, if you tell me exactly (step by step) what I have to do to give
you
more information, I will try my best. I am very happy with ClamAV so far
and
I want to support it.
(I'm going to assume you're clamd is multithreaded. If not just
On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 10:57, Trog wrote:
But, perhaps it's just me, but I don't quite understand why
people are writing such scripts instead of spending their effort
actually trying to fix the problem.
I've had it happen ~3 times in the last year. Each time it crashes,
there are thousands of
OK, clamd already crashed once again, and now I was trying to follow your
guide...
(I'm going to assume you're clamd is multithreaded. If not
just do steps 1-3 followed by the command 'bt').
I think so, how can I tell?
This may, or may not, provide some useful information.
1. Use 'ps' to
18 matches
Mail list logo
