by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
07/14/2007 08:04 AM
Please respond to
ClamAV users ML clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
To
ClamAV users ML clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
cc
Subject
Re: [Clamav-users] clamscan 0.88.7 clamscan 0.90.3
Hello Luis,
v0.88.7 clamscan some_file.txt: 2 seconds.
v0.90.3
,
---
Dave B
Luca Gibelli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
07/14/2007 08:04 AM
Please respond to
ClamAV users ML clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
To
ClamAV users ML clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
cc
Subject
Re: [Clamav-users] clamscan 0.88.7 clamscan 0.90.3
Hello
,
---
Dave B
Luca Gibelli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
07/14/2007 08:04 AM
Please respond to
ClamAV users ML clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
To
ClamAV users ML clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
cc
Subject
Re: [Clamav-users] clamscan 0.88.7 clamscan 0.90.3
Hello
Hi all,
v0.88.7 clamscan some_file.txt: 2 seconds.
v0.90.3 clamscan some_file.txt: 120 seconds.
I know that for performance is better to use clamdscan,
but for my clients load, clamscan 0.88.x performance is ok
and dont need a daemon running (better reliability)
but now than clamscan 0.90.x is
Hello Luis,
v0.88.7 clamscan some_file.txt: 2 seconds.
v0.90.3 clamscan some_file.txt: 120 seconds.
[snip]
Why 0.90.x clamscan load time is slower than 0.88.x?
Will clamscan load time be improved in future versions?
This topic has been beated to death: upgrade to 0.91.
Best regards
