I run the following command in FreeBSD and it delete the entire mailbox when
there is a single email contain virus.
clamscan --infected --recursive --remove
The mailserver is exim, hosting control panel is cpanel. May I know what is
the correct command to have clamav to remove only
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 01:47:20AM -0800, Lee Yip Fei said:
I run the following command in FreeBSD and it delete the entire
mailbox when there is a single email contain virus.
clamscan --infected --recursive --remove
The mailserver is exim, hosting control panel is cpanel. May I
Hi Stephen Gran,
Yeah, it is mbox. Is there a specific command that can be used to tell clamav
to convert the mbox to maildir before scanning?
-
Relax. Yahoo! Mail virus scanning helps detect nasty viruses!
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 02:23:52AM -0800, Lee Yip Fei said:
Hi Stephen Gran,
Yeah, it is mbox. Is there a specific command that can be used to
tell clamav to convert the mbox to maildir before scanning?
clamav does not do this itself. You will need to look for software to
handle the
That would be too troublesome as there are many accounts in the server.
Hopefully clamav with have this feature in future. Do there have any plan on
this now?
-
What are the most popular cars? Find out at Yahoo! Autos
On 2/23/06, Lee Yip Fei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That would be too troublesome as there are many accounts in the server.
Hopefully clamav with have this feature in future. Do there have any plan on
this now?
Have you looked at projects like MailScanner? It integrates tools like
SpamAssassin
Lee Yip Fei spake thusly on Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 01:47:20AM -0800:
I run the following command in FreeBSD and it delete the entire mailbox when
there is a single email contain virus.
clamscan --infected --recursive --remove
The mailserver is exim, hosting control panel is
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 09:56:23AM -0700, Richard Feldmann wrote:
It might be best to find a scanning system that checks at the smtp level,
Sometimes I think that scanning at end-user's mailbox access level
(eg. POP3) could be even better, as it gives additional time for
signatures database
Richard Feldmann wrote:
It might be best to find a scanning system that checks at the smtp level,
rather than scanning the mailbox of the user manually. This would delete the
virus as it's being transferred while preserving the message, and you
wouldn't have the same issue of having the
On 2/23/06 12:56 PM, Jason Haar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richard Feldmann wrote:
It might be best to find a scanning system that checks at the smtp level,
rather than scanning the mailbox of the user manually. This would delete the
virus as it's being transferred while preserving the
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 07:56:13 +1300
Jason Haar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It might be best to find a scanning system that checks at
the smtp level, rather than scanning the mailbox of the user
manually. This would delete the virus as it's being
transferred while preserving the message, and
Jason Haar wrote:
Richard Feldmann wrote:
It might be best to find a scanning system that checks at the smtp level,
rather than scanning the mailbox of the user manually. This would delete the
virus as it's being transferred while preserving the message, and you wouldn't
have the same issue
John Jolet spake thusly on Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 01:02:32PM -0600:
On 2/23/06 12:56 PM, Jason Haar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richard Feldmann wrote:
It might be best to find a scanning system that checks at the smtp level,
rather than scanning the mailbox of the user manually. This
13 matches
Mail list logo
