[Clamav-users] daily.wmd/daily.cvd trouble (was daily.wmd trouble with 0.91rc1)

2007-06-02 Thread Sergey
On Saturday 02 June 2007, Noel Jones wrote: new main.cvd and daily.cvd.  Deleting daily.cvd stopped clamscan from dumping core for me. It helped me too. But I use 0.90.2 and 0.90.3 -- Regards, Sergey ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:

Re: [Clamav-users] daily.wmd/daily.cvd trouble (was daily.wmd trouble with 0.91rc1)

2007-06-02 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Sat, 2 Jun 2007 16:07:26 +0500 Sergey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: and... Broken update is not good, but core dumping of clamd is very bad. It would be good to make clamd steadier with broken updates... First of all, the update itself was OK. Secondly, it's not possible to predict software

Re: [Clamav-users] daily.wmd/daily.cvd trouble (was daily.wmd trouble with 0.91rc1)

2007-06-02 Thread Sergey
On Saturday 02 June 2007, Tomasz Kojm wrote: and... Broken update is not good, but core dumping of clamd is very bad. It would be good to make clamd steadier with broken updates... First of all, the update itself was OK. The problem appeared at Jun 2 04:53:33 GMT+5 in first time with

Re: [Clamav-users] daily.wmd/daily.cvd trouble (was daily.wmd trouble with 0.91rc1)

2007-06-02 Thread Luca Gibelli
Hello Sergey, and... Broken update is not good, but core dumping of clamd is very bad. It would be good to make clamd steadier with broken updates... First of all, the update itself was OK. The problem appeared at Jun 2 04:53:33 GMT+5 in first time with 0.90.3 the offending

Re: [Clamav-users] daily.wmd/daily.cvd trouble (was daily.wmd trouble with 0.91rc1)

2007-06-02 Thread Noel Jones
At 06:29 AM 6/2/2007, Tomasz Kojm wrote: On Sat, 2 Jun 2007 16:07:26 +0500 Sergey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: and... Broken update is not good, but core dumping of clamd is very bad. It would be good to make clamd steadier with broken updates... First of all, the update itself was OK. Secondly,