* Jim Maul [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-10-19 16:14]:
Its actually --no-summary although --disable-summary may still work.
Oh yes, thank you. I just removed all args that appeared in my log as
obsolete.
Alex
--
Alex Pleinerzeitform Internet Dienste
mailto:[EMAIL
Hello list,
I have upgraded from clamav 075.1 to clamav-80 using the rpm for FC2.
after the upgrade, qmail-scanner ( 1.23 ) is not detecting clamav.
I have recompiles qmail-scanner, ran qmail-scanner.pl -z and
qmail-scanner.pl -g , with the same result.
Any clue??
Best Regards,
Kareem Mahgoub
* Kareem Mahgoub [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-10-19 10:32]:
Hello list,
I have upgraded from clamav 075.1 to clamav-80 using the rpm for FC2.
after the upgrade, qmail-scanner ( 1.23 ) is not detecting clamav.
I have recompiles qmail-scanner, ran qmail-scanner.pl -z and
qmail-scanner.pl -g , with
On 10/19/2004 10:32 AM +0200, Kareem Mahgoub wrote:
Hello list,
I have upgraded from clamav 075.1 to clamav-80 using the rpm for FC2.
after the upgrade, qmail-scanner ( 1.23 ) is not detecting clamav.
I have recompiles qmail-scanner, ran qmail-scanner.pl -z and
qmail-scanner.pl -g , with the same
,
Kareem Mahgoub
- Original Message -
From: Niek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ClamAV users ML [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 12:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] qmail-scanner-1.23 and clamav 0.80
On 10/19/2004 10:32 AM +0200, Kareem Mahgoub wrote:
Hello list,
I have upgraded
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 12:39:44 +0200
Kareem Mahgoub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the quick help.
I thought it is something in clamav not QS ( on a second thought, it
should really go to QS mailing list ) my apology.
For hitting reply on a previous thread,
I thought it won't harm
Alex Pleiner wrote:
* Kareem Mahgoub [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-10-19 10:32]:
Hello list,
I have upgraded from clamav 075.1 to clamav-80 using the rpm for FC2.
after the upgrade, qmail-scanner ( 1.23 ) is not detecting clamav.
I have recompiles qmail-scanner, ran qmail-scanner.pl -z and
I'm not sure what is more obnoxious. Top posting a short response ...
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 12:39:44 +0200
Kareem Mahgoub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the quick help.
I thought it is something in clamav not QS ( on a second thought, it
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 11:47:33 -0700 (PDT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure what is more obnoxious. Top posting a short response ...
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 12:39:44 +0200
Kareem Mahgoub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the quick help.
