Mark wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net
> [mailto:clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net] On Behalf Of Daniel J
> McDonald
> Sent: maandag 30 maart 2009 15:54
> To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users]
-Original Message-
From: clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net
[mailto:clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net] On Behalf Of Daniel J
McDonald
Sent: maandag 30 maart 2009 15:54
To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] test for SafeBrowsing?
> > ... I can't
nt: donderdag 19 maart 2009 15:14
>> To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
>> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] test for SafeBrowsing?
>>
> > I tried all topsites URLs from http://www.stopbadware.org/home/topsites,
>> but I can't get any URL to match. :(
>
bject: Re: [Clamav-users] test for SafeBrowsing?
>
> I tried all topsites URLs from http://www.stopbadware.org/home/topsites,
> but I can't get any URL to match. :(
Were you putting the URL's in bare, or enclosing them in ?
Apparently, clamav has trouble finding bare uris.
I ma
-Original Message-
From: clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net
[mailto:clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net] On Behalf Of McDonald, Dan
Sent: donderdag 19 maart 2009 15:14
To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] test for SafeBrowsing?
I tried all topsites URLs from
On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 07:20 -0700, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Erwan David wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 01:55:14PM CET, Dennis Peterson
> > said:
> >> Moray Henderson (ICT) wrote:
> From: Török Edwin [mailto:edwinto...@gmail.com]
> >> Try using for the URL.
> >>
> > Is that a
At 7:20 AM -0700 3/18/09, Dennis Peterson wrote:
>Erwan David wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 01:55:14PM CET, Dennis
>>Peterson said:
>>> Moray Henderson (ICT) wrote:
> From: Török Edwin [mailto:edwinto...@gmail.com]
>>> Try using for the URL.
>>>
>> Is that a requirement?
Erwan David wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 01:55:14PM CET, Dennis Peterson
> said:
>> Moray Henderson (ICT) wrote:
From: Török Edwin [mailto:edwinto...@gmail.com]
>> Try using for the URL.
>>
> Is that a requirement? If so we should get the spammers on board because
some
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 05:55, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Moray Henderson (ICT) wrote:
>>> From: Török Edwin [mailto:edwinto...@gmail.com]
> Try using for the URL.
>
Is that a requirement? If so we should get the spammers on board because
>>> some of
them may not know this :).
>>>
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 01:55:14PM CET, Dennis Peterson
said:
> Moray Henderson (ICT) wrote:
> >> From: Török Edwin [mailto:edwinto...@gmail.com]
> Try using for the URL.
>
> >>> Is that a requirement? If so we should get the spammers on board because
> >> some of
> >>> them may not kn
Moray Henderson (ICT) wrote:
>> From: Török Edwin [mailto:edwinto...@gmail.com]
Try using for the URL.
>>> Is that a requirement? If so we should get the spammers on board because
>> some of
>>> them may not know this :).
>> No, there are more places from where URLs can be extracted, but
>From: Török Edwin [mailto:edwinto...@gmail.com]
>>> Try using for the URL.
>>>
>> Is that a requirement? If so we should get the spammers on board because
>some of
>> them may not know this :).
>
>No, there are more places from where URLs can be extracted, but "href" is one that must work.
With
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 16:59 +0200, Török Edwin wrote:
> On 2009-03-17 16:57, McDonald, Dan wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 14:08 +, Steve Basford wrote:
> >
> >>> Is there a test string I can use to see if the SafeBrowsing code is
> >>> working properly? I've just set up 0.95RC2 with SafeB
On 2009-03-17 17:07, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Török Edwin wrote:
>
>
>> Try using for the URL.
>>
>>
>
> Is that a requirement? If so we should get the spammers on board because some
> of
> them may not know this :).
No, there are more places from where URLs can be extracted, but "http:
Török Edwin wrote:
>
> Try using for the URL.
>
Is that a requirement? If so we should get the spammers on board because some
of
them may not know this :).
dp
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.
On 2009-03-17 16:57, McDonald, Dan wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 14:08 +, Steve Basford wrote:
>
>>> Is there a test string I can use to see if the SafeBrowsing code is
>>> working properly? I've just set up 0.95RC2 with SafeBrowsing enabled.
>>> I've sent an EICAR and detected that, and s
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 14:08 +, Steve Basford wrote:
> > Is there a test string I can use to see if the SafeBrowsing code is
> > working properly? I've just set up 0.95RC2 with SafeBrowsing enabled.
> > I've sent an EICAR and detected that, and scanned
> > the /usr/share/doc/clamav-0.95/test/ d
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 14:08 +, Steve Basford wrote:
> > Is there a test string I can use to see if the SafeBrowsing code is
> > working properly? I've just set up 0.95RC2 with SafeBrowsing enabled.
> > I've sent an EICAR and detected that, and scanned
> > the /usr/share/doc/clamav-0.95/test/ d
On 2009-03-17 15:58, McDonald, Dan wrote:
> Is there a test string I can use to see if the SafeBrowsing code is
> working properly? I've just set up 0.95RC2 with SafeBrowsing enabled.
> I've sent an EICAR and detected that, and scanned
> the /usr/share/doc/clamav-0.95/test/ directory to find ClamA
> Is there a test string I can use to see if the SafeBrowsing code is
> working properly? I've just set up 0.95RC2 with SafeBrowsing enabled.
> I've sent an EICAR and detected that, and scanned
> the /usr/share/doc/clamav-0.95/test/ directory to find ClamAV-Test-File,
> but I would like to see a S
Is there a test string I can use to see if the SafeBrowsing code is
working properly? I've just set up 0.95RC2 with SafeBrowsing enabled.
I've sent an EICAR and detected that, and scanned
the /usr/share/doc/clamav-0.95/test/ directory to find ClamAV-Test-File,
but I would like to see a SafeBrowsin
21 matches
Mail list logo
