Hi there,
On Tue, 31 Mar 2015, Torge Husfeldt wrote:
I had to emergency-disable archive-scanning more than a month ago and
still have no solution.
Is there some reason that you can't compile ClamAV yourself?
For a number of packages I prefer to do that rather than use the
configurations supp
On Monday, March 30, 2015 06:37:52 PM Torge Husfeldt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sorry to warm up this _really_old_ topic.
>
> Am 11.02.2014 um 17:23 schrieb Jim Popovitch:
> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Andrew Kelly wrote:
> >> Nearly mid February 2014 now. 0.98.1 has been available for a
> >> mont
Hi,
sorry to warm up this _really_old_ topic.
Am 11.02.2014 um 17:23 schrieb Jim Popovitch:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Andrew Kelly wrote:
>>
>> Nearly mid February 2014 now. 0.98.1 has been available for a
>> month already, and Debian is still stuck at 0.97.8.
And one more year and on
Tried to spare the list another thank you, but I wasn't
able to mail you directly.
Sorry list.
Dennis,
in light of the value you've explicitly placed upon your
time, thank you once again for all the explanation and
for your efforts.
Very much appreciated.
>> dp - Unix wonk since 1980
Nice
On 2/12/14, 6:29 AM, Andrew Kelly wrote:
On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 21:28 -0800, Dennis Peterson wrote:
On 2/11/14, 8:06 AM, Andrew Kelly wrote:
So.
So. Andy - You do know that this is the wrong list for complaints about
Debian support, right? You might have better luck here:
Thanks
Greg Folkert wrote:
> Debian Stable is that. If you must have 0.98.1, you should also be using
> "backports"... at least I used to until I just used Sid for everything.
> Backports help extend Stable's longevity and "freshness" a bit... but it
> is no guarantee 0.98.1 will be there.
Actually it
Hi Andy,
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 03:29:28PM +0100, Andrew Kelly wrote:
> At any rate, I'm running a farm of "stable" and "old-stable"
> deployments, the dep nightmare of pulling something from testing
> isn't really going to serve my customer base very well. And
> the 20 minutes.. well, were it th
On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 15:29 +0100, Andrew Kelly wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 21:28 -0800, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> > On 2/11/14, 8:06 AM, Andrew Kelly wrote:
> >
> > > So.
>
> > So. Andy - You do know that this is the wrong list for complaints about
> > Debian support, right? You migh
On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 21:28 -0800, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> On 2/11/14, 8:06 AM, Andrew Kelly wrote:
>
> > So.
> So. Andy - You do know that this is the wrong list for complaints about
> Debian support, right? You might have better luck here:
Thanks for the guidance, Dennis, much app
On 2/11/14, 8:06 AM, Andrew Kelly wrote:
So.
Nearly mid February 2014 now. 0.98.1 has been available for a
month already, and Debian is still stuck at 0.97.8.
Is there any kind of formal statement from the package maintainer,
or is this simply an orphaned project?
Andy
So. Andy - Yo
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Andrew Kelly wrote:
>
> Nearly mid February 2014 now. 0.98.1 has been available for a
> month already, and Debian is still stuck at 0.97.8.
Welcome to Debian. ;-) If you want bleeding edge, don't use Debian
Stable (use Debian Testing)
> Is there any kind of for
On Wed, 2014-01-08 at 10:55 -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-12-16 at 10:22 +, Simon Hobson wrote:
> > Does anyone know what the situation is with Debian packages ?
> > It's been something like 2 months now and 0.98 still doesn't appear to have
> > made it to unstable, let alone testi
On Mon, 2013-12-16 at 10:22 +, Simon Hobson wrote:
> Does anyone know what the situation is with Debian packages ?
> It's been something like 2 months now and 0.98 still doesn't appear to have
> made it to unstable, let alone testing.
>
> I'm assuming this also affects Debian derived distros
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 03:11:47AM +, Joel Esler (jesler) wrote:
>
> > On Dec 17, 2013, at 5:28, "Simon Hobson" wrote:
> >
> > Well since no-one's come back with something like "the package maintainer's
> > gone AWOL" or similar, I'll keep bumping that bug ticket. Does seem
> > strange, I
> On Dec 17, 2013, at 5:28, "Simon Hobson" wrote:
>
> Well since no-one's come back with something like "the package maintainer's
> gone AWOL" or similar, I'll keep bumping that bug ticket. Does seem strange,
> I don't recall such a long delay in the past.
> Updating from source isn't really a
Greg Folkert wrote:
>Simon,
>Why not open a Bug, or look to see if there is one. Oh wait:
>In Pending Upload bugs for
>http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=727027
>
>Just gotta look. Rending since Oct 2013
Yes indeed.
>And lookit that, some "Simon Hobson"
>
>Commented on it Fri, 15
On Mon, 2013-12-16 at 21:03 +0700, k...@crypto.my.id wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 08:51:16 -0500
> Greg Folkert wrote:
>
> > Koko
> > Ubuntu is not Debian. Most packages that are "Daemon"
> > are failing to work because of "upstart"... and library
> > differences.
> >
> sorry for the noise.. alt
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 08:51:16 -0500
Greg Folkert wrote:
> Koko
> Ubuntu is not Debian. Most packages that are "Daemon"
> are failing to work because of "upstart"... and library
> differences.
>
sorry for the noise.. alternative build from source.
___
He
On Mon, 2013-12-16 at 18:05 +0700, k...@crypto.my.id wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 10:22:25 +
> "Simon Hobson" wrote:
>
> > Does anyone know what the situation is with Debian packages ?
> > It's been something like 2 months now and 0.98 still doesn't appear to have
> > made it to unstable, l
Hi there,
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013, Simon Hobson wrote:
Does anyone know what the situation is with Debian packages ?
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=pkg-clamav-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
--
73,
Ged.
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 10:22:25 +
"Simon Hobson" wrote:
> Does anyone know what the situation is with Debian packages ?
> It's been something like 2 months now and 0.98 still doesn't appear to have
> made it to unstable, let alone testing.
>
> I'm assuming this also affects Debian derived dis
Does anyone know what the situation is with Debian packages ?
It's been something like 2 months now and 0.98 still doesn't appear to have
made it to unstable, let alone testing.
I'm assuming this also affects Debian derived distros like Mint and Ubuntu.
___
22 matches
Mail list logo
