Re: [clamav-users] How the bad signature happened - conjecture (was Re: URGENT: Clamd is wedged on multiple installations)

Thanks! fd's holding steady now. Maybe I should go clean some logs now before nightly Logwatch kicks in. Good luck! Reio On 26.01.2018 19:38, Joel Esler (jesler) wrote: Reio, Thanks, I was just about to send this out. A new daily.cvd is now shipping. -- Joel Esler | Talos: Manager |

Re: [clamav-users] How the bad signature happened - conjecture (was Re: URGENT: Clamd is wedged on multiple installations)

Hello! News from the front: daily.cld updated (version: 24258, sigs: 1836466, f-level: 63, builder: neo) Good luck! Reio On 26.01.2018 19:29, Joel Esler (jesler) wrote: Steve Morgan, a developer here at Cisco that worked on ClamAV for about the past five years or so, decided to retire.

Re: [clamav-users] How the bad signature happened - conjecture (was Re: URGENT: Clamd is wedged on multiple installations)

Steve Morgan, a developer here at Cisco that worked on ClamAV for about the past five years or so, decided to retire. Monday was his last day. On top of that, one our other developers (Micah) was out of the office today for a holiday, and so that only left, essentially myself and a couple

Re: [clamav-users] How the bad signature happened - conjecture (was Re: URGENT: Clamd is wedged on multiple installations)

HI Marcus, Any chance you'd be willing to share your copy of 24255? -J On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 7:07 AM, Marcus Schopen wrote: > Am Freitag, den 26.01.2018, 07:02 -0800 schrieb Jason J. W. Williams: > > How does one manually download an old daily.cld? > > Good question.

Re: [clamav-users] How the bad signature happened - conjecture (was Re: URGENT: Clamd is wedged on multiple installations)

Am Freitag, den 26.01.2018, 07:02 -0800 schrieb Jason J. W. Williams: > How does one manually download an old daily.cld? Good question. workaround: got the old version from my backup. Ciao! ___ clamav-users mailing list clamav-users@lists.clamav.net

Re: [clamav-users] How the bad signature happened - conjecture (was Re: URGENT: Clamd is wedged on multiple installations)

How does one manually download an old daily.cld? -J On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 7:00 AM, Paul wrote: > On 26/01/2018 14:56, Marcus Schopen wrote: > > Am Freitag, den 26.01.2018, 07:48 -0700 schrieb Rafael Ferreira: >> >>> Nope, latest is still >>> >>> File: daily.cvd >>>

Re: [clamav-users] How the bad signature happened - conjecture (was Re: URGENT: Clamd is wedged on multiple installations)

On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 06:44:30 -0800 "Jason J. W. Williams" wrote: > We started seeing this problem last night as well. Reading through the > thread, it doesn't appear that ClamAV has fixed the signatures yet > (as of 24257), or am I wrong? Not only has it not been

Re: [clamav-users] How the bad signature happened - conjecture (was Re: URGENT: Clamd is wedged on multiple installations)

On 26/01/2018 14:56, Marcus Schopen wrote: Am Freitag, den 26.01.2018, 07:48 -0700 schrieb Rafael Ferreira: Nope, latest is still File: daily.cvd Build time: 26 Jan 2018 04:24 -0500 Version: 24257 Signatures: 1835982 Functionality level: 63 Builder: neo MD5: 3b3092994fdf9aa39aae480c38fb31ab

Re: [clamav-users] How the bad signature happened - conjecture (was Re: URGENT: Clamd is wedged on multiple installations)

Am Freitag, den 26.01.2018, 07:48 -0700 schrieb Rafael Ferreira: > Nope, latest is still > > File: daily.cvd > Build time: 26 Jan 2018 04:24 -0500 > Version: 24257 > Signatures: 1835982 > Functionality level: 63 > Builder: neo > MD5: 3b3092994fdf9aa39aae480c38fb31ab > Digital signature: >

Re: [clamav-users] How the bad signature happened - conjecture (was Re: URGENT: Clamd is wedged on multiple installations)

Nope, latest is still File: daily.cvd Build time: 26 Jan 2018 04:24 -0500 Version: 24257 Signatures: 1835982 Functionality level: 63 Builder: neo MD5: 3b3092994fdf9aa39aae480c38fb31ab Digital signature:

Re: [clamav-users] How the bad signature happened - conjecture (was Re: URGENT: Clamd is wedged on multiple installations)

We started seeing this problem last night as well. Reading through the thread, it doesn't appear that ClamAV has fixed the signatures yet (as of 24257), or am I wrong? -J On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 6:24 AM, Dianne Skoll wrote: > On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 13:50:27 +0100 > Ralf

[clamav-users] How the bad signature happened - conjecture (was Re: URGENT: Clamd is wedged on multiple installations)

On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 13:50:27 +0100 Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > If I had to guess: they used the beta for testing, but the release > versions (both 0.99.2 and 0.99.3!) fail to operate properly... No, I bet that's not what happened. A file descriptor leak doesn't show