Re: [clamav-users] Why clamdscan and clamscan may give different results

2020-01-09 Thread Paul Kosinski via clamav-users
Yes of course you can pass options to clamscan on the command line (it's what I did in my 4th example). But my point is that it makes clamscan much harder to use in practice, as with only the default values for the options, clamscan can be very misleading. For now, I guess I'll have to write a lit

Re: [clamav-users] Why clamdscan and clamscan may give different results

2020-01-09 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On Jan 8, 2020, at 18:25, Paul Kosinski via clamav-users wrote: It seems to be because clamscan does not respect the options in clamd.conf... On 08.01.20 18:38, Al Varnell via clamav-users wrote: That's correct and AFAIK, has always been the case. clamscan configurations is accomplished dur

Re: [clamav-users] Why clamdscan and clamscan may give different results

2020-01-08 Thread Al Varnell via clamav-users
That's correct and AFAIK, has always been the case. clamscan configurations is accomplished during the compile stage leading to installation and clamd.conf options only apply to clamd and clamdscan. -Al- On Jan 8, 2020, at 18:25, Paul Kosinski via clamav-users wrote: > > It seems to be becau

[clamav-users] Why clamdscan and clamscan may give different results

2020-01-08 Thread Paul Kosinski via clamav-users
Having built ClamAV 0.102.1 a few days ago, I stumbled on the following unfortunate behavior (which is probably not related to 0.102.1), and have a suggestion to remedy it. I recently did a backup from a Win 7 Pro machine to a directory on our CIFS server and decided to try running ClamAV on the l