Re: [clamav-users] clamscan vs clamdscan

2020-05-11 Thread Gene Heskett via clamav-users
On Monday 11 May 2020 10:04:34 G.W. Haywood via clamav-users wrote: > Hi there, > > On Sun, 10 May 2020, Paul Kosinski via clamav-users wrote: > > Our email handling is [...snip...] > > Mail system design isn't really the topic for this list, so I won't > comment further on your setup. > > > (You

Re: [clamav-users] clamscan vs clamdscan

2020-05-11 Thread G.W. Haywood via clamav-users
Hi there, On Sun, 10 May 2020, Paul Kosinski via clamav-users wrote: Our email handling is [...snip...] Mail system design isn't really the topic for this list, so I won't comment further on your setup. (You might be surprised how much email to made-up user names ... Back in the 1980s I

Re: [clamav-users] clamscan vs clamdscan

2020-05-10 Thread Paul Kosinski via clamav-users
On milters: Our email handling is a two stage mechanism. Our rented server at our public IP address is a small, cheap VM (with no ports blocked, of course) which runs Postfix and Apache. There is not enough RAM to also run clamd, so we simply use Postfix's builtin filter mechanisms, like SMTP

Re: [clamav-users] clamscan vs clamdscan

2020-05-10 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On Sat, 9 May 2020, Paul Kosinski via clamav-users wrote: On our mailserver, we run clamdscan, since mail arrives frequently (!). Citeren "G.W. Haywood via clamav-users" : On a mail server most people would use a milter, e.g. clamav-milter, which is part of the ClamAV package. On 10.05.20

Re: [clamav-users] clamscan vs clamdscan

2020-05-10 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On Sat, 9 May 2020, Paul Kosinski via clamav-users wrote: On our mailserver, we run clamdscan, since mail arrives frequently (!). On 10.05.20 09:33, G.W. Haywood via clamav-users wrote: On a mail server most people would use a milter, e.g. clamav-milter, which is part of the ClamAV package.

Re: [clamav-users] clamscan vs clamdscan

2020-05-10 Thread Christian
Dear Iulian , thanks a lot for your answer. That sounds good. So I take it that I can have clamav and clamav-daemon installed at the same time and use either of them. That´s really cool. Thank you again for your confirmation and explanation. There´s just one question remaining which concerns

Re: [clamav-users] clamscan vs clamdscan

2020-05-10 Thread G.W. Haywood via clamav-users
Hi there, On Sat, 9 May 2020, iulian stan via clamav-users wrote: It's normal that scanning with clamdscan takes a shorter time than clamscan because the virus databases is already loaded (since it's a daemon) and ready for action. For testing purposes(debugging, etc) you can use clamscan for

Re: [clamav-users] clamscan vs clamdscan

2020-05-10 Thread Arjen de Korte via clamav-users
Citeren "G.W. Haywood via clamav-users" : Hi there, On Sat, 9 May 2020, Paul Kosinski via clamav-users wrote: On our mailserver, we run clamdscan, since mail arrives frequently (!). On a mail server most people would use a milter, e.g. clamav-milter, which is part of the ClamAV package.

Re: [clamav-users] clamscan vs clamdscan

2020-05-10 Thread G.W. Haywood via clamav-users
Hi there, On Sat, 9 May 2020, Paul Kosinski via clamav-users wrote: On our mailserver, we run clamdscan, since mail arrives frequently (!). On a mail server most people would use a milter, e.g. clamav-milter, which is part of the ClamAV package. The use of milters offers many benefits. It

Re: [clamav-users] clamscan vs clamdscan

2020-05-09 Thread iulian stan via clamav-users
Dear Christian, It's normal that scanning with clamdscan takes a shorter time than clamscan because the virus databases is already loaded (since it's a daemon) and ready for action. For testing purposes(debugging, etc) you can use clamscan for all other purposes use clamdscan where you don't

Re: [clamav-users] clamscan vs clamdscan

2020-05-09 Thread G.W. Haywood via clamav-users
Hi there, On Sat, 9 May 2020, Christian wrote: ... Is it alright to have  *clamav* and *clamav-daemon* installed alongside each other? So that I can run  either "clamscan somefile"  or  "clamdscan somefile"? You should really have asked that question on a mailing list for your Linux

[clamav-users] clamscan vs clamdscan

2020-05-09 Thread Christian
Hi altogether, I´ve got a question regarding *clamscan* vs *clamdscan*. My system is Linux/BodhiLinux 5.1.0 in a VM. As antivirus-software I installed *clamav*: /sudo apt-get install clamav clamav-freshclam/ Scanning procedure is good although a bit slow. So in addition to that I installed the

Re: [Clamav-users] clamscan vs clamdscan: issues

2003-12-05 Thread Kritof Petr
Khalid J Hosein wrote: Hello all, I'm running ClamAV 0.65 which I installed on a RedHat 9 box from RPM (ftp://crash.fce.vutbr.cz/pub/linux/clamav/clamav-0.65-2.i386.rpm). I'm testing out running scans against the system using clamscan and clamdscan (the clamd client), and I have the clamd

[Clamav-users] clamscan vs clamdscan: issues

2003-12-03 Thread Khalid J Hosein
Hello all, I'm running ClamAV 0.65 which I installed on a RedHat 9 box from RPM (ftp://crash.fce.vutbr.cz/pub/linux/clamav/clamav-0.65-2.i386.rpm). I'm testing out running scans against the system using clamscan and clamdscan (the clamd client), and I have the clamd daemon running. Here are