Re: [clamav-users] human friendly signatures

2022-06-20 Thread G.W. Haywood via clamav-users
Hi there, This is a more or less random data point. On Mon, 14 Mar 2022, Micah Snyder (micasnyd) via clamav-users wrote: Sorry that this response come so late that is nearly a necro-thread. ... Er, ditto. ... If anyone has any other ideas about it, I'd love to hear them. ... One thing

Re: [clamav-users] human friendly signatures

2022-03-21 Thread Kris Deugau
G.W. Haywood via clamav-users wrote: Hi there, On Mon, 21 Mar 2022, Kris Deugau wrote: TBH I'd prefer if Clam *did* continue, just skipping malformed rules (and also whinging loudly in the log). I could live with that if it didn't *also* crash. Either would be better than just exiting

Re: [clamav-users] human friendly signatures

2022-03-21 Thread G.W. Haywood via clamav-users
Hi there, On Mon, 21 Mar 2022, Kris Deugau wrote: TBH I'd prefer if Clam *did* continue, just skipping malformed rules (and also whinging loudly in the log). I could live with that if it didn't *also* crash. Either would be better than just exiting (it's not a hard *crash*, it's "just"

Re: [clamav-users] human friendly signatures

2022-03-21 Thread Kris Deugau
G.W. Haywood via clamav-users wrote: Hi Micah, On Wed, 16 Mar 2022, Micah Snyder (micasnyd) wrote: I'm not sure what you mean here.  Can you elaborate?  If you simply want ClamAV ignore garbage rules on load and continue with the rest of the file (see point #4) - that's something we can easily

Re: [clamav-users] human friendly signatures

2022-03-19 Thread G.W. Haywood via clamav-users
Hi Micah, On Wed, 16 Mar 2022, Micah Snyder (micasnyd) wrote: (1) a plea for a way to test rules before they go live; If you mean "for personal use" then I'd say, "What Maarten said." Er, no. Not "scan to make sure it detects things". What I meant was "do something to make sure it won't

Re: [clamav-users] human friendly signatures

2022-03-16 Thread Steve Basford
On 16 March 2022 22:16:05 Eric Tykwinski wrote: Steve, I like the idea, but why the hex; hex? Sorry, should have been clearer... not just hex but Test;Engine:81-255,Target:0;(b0);0f0f0f*0b0b0b;0/blah*(?:[4-7]|[8003]\d)/ etc...>Just thinking about my recent issues with direct deposit

Re: [clamav-users] human friendly signatures

2022-03-16 Thread Steve Basford
On 16 March 2022 22:16:05 Eric Tykwinski wrote: Steve, I like the idea, but why the hex; hex? Just thinking about my recent issues with direct deposit phishing emails from gmail.com and they are written probably by people, so I can’t really hash it, and have to regex it. On Mar 16,

Re: [clamav-users] human friendly signatures

2022-03-16 Thread Eric Tykwinski
Steve, I like the idea, but why the hex; hex? Just thinking about my recent issues with direct deposit phishing emails from gmail.com and they are written probably by people, so I can’t really hash it, and have to regex it. > On Mar 16, 2022, at 5:10 PM, Steve Basford > wrote: > > On 16

Re: [clamav-users] human friendly signatures

2022-03-16 Thread Steve Basford
On 16 March 2022 20:29:19 "Micah Snyder \(micasnyd\) via clamav-users" wrote: yara rule loading logic works right now. (3) a way to specify that a rule is to match in (a) mail headers only or (b) mail body only or (c) both; Just a random early thought... could .ldb be extended...

Re: [clamav-users] human friendly signatures

2022-03-16 Thread Micah Snyder (micasnyd) via clamav-users
Snyder ClamAV Development Talos Cisco Systems, Inc. From: clamav-users on behalf of G.W. Haywood via clamav-users Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2022 10:51 AM To: ClamAV users ML Cc: G.W. Haywood Subject: Re: [clamav-users] human friendly signatures Hi there, On T

Re: [clamav-users] human friendly signatures

2022-03-16 Thread Micah Snyder (micasnyd) via clamav-users
Micah Snyder ClamAV Development Talos Cisco Systems, Inc. From: Micah Snyder (micasnyd) Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2022 12:10 PM To: ClamAV users ML ; Laurent S. <110ef9e3086d8405c2929e34be5b4...@protonmail.ch> Subject: Re: [clamav-users] human friendly sign

Re: [clamav-users] human friendly signatures

2022-03-16 Thread Micah Snyder (micasnyd) via clamav-users
-users on behalf of Laurent S. via clamav-users Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2022 3:42 AM To: ClamAV users ML Cc: Laurent S. <110ef9e3086d8405c2929e34be5b4...@protonmail.ch> Subject: Re: [clamav-users] human friendly signatures On Tuesday, March 15th, 2022 at 00:36, Micah Snyder (micasnyd)

Re: [clamav-users] human friendly signatures

2022-03-15 Thread Maarten Broekman via clamav-users
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 1:53 PM G.W. Haywood via clamav-users < clamav-users@lists.clamav.net> wrote: > Hi there, > > On Tue, 15 Mar 2022, Laurent S. via clamav-users wrote: > >> using Yara's engine in clamav directly is something that has been > >> brought up time and again. It is possible. My

Re: [clamav-users] human friendly signatures

2022-03-15 Thread G.W. Haywood via clamav-users
Hi there, On Tue, 15 Mar 2022, Laurent S. via clamav-users wrote: On Tuesday, March 15th, 2022 at 00:36, Micah Snyder wrote: Starting with our own new language would let us maintain do that but make it easier for new analysts to train up on ClamAV. I don't see at all the advantage of using

Re: [clamav-users] human friendly signatures

2022-03-15 Thread Laurent S. via clamav-users
On Tuesday, March 15th, 2022 at 00:36, Micah Snyder (micasnyd) wrote: > Starting with our own new language would let us maintain do that but make it > easier for new analysts to train up on ClamAV. I don't see at all the advantage of using a different, less used language. I don't know many

[clamav-users] human friendly signatures

2022-03-14 Thread Micah Snyder (micasnyd) via clamav-users
Hi all, Sorry that this response come so late that is nearly a necro-thread. Things have been busy. I've been thinking about some of the thing you all have said. And we've talked about it a bit as a team. We know there is a lot of interest in having better Yara support, not only because it