Am 27.09.18 um 11:04 schrieb Arnaud Jacques:
>> I then restarted the milter. Unfortunately, the email is still marked as
>> Spam. I thought that clamav-milter would simply ignore the file.
>>
>> X-Virus-Status: Infected (SecuriteInfo.com.Spam-4701.UNOFFICIAL)
>
> You can whitelist the
Am 27.09.18 um 01:53 schrieb Ted Hatfield:
> On Thu, 27 Sep 2018, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> Am 27.09.18 um 00:34 schrieb Ted Hatfield:
>>> None of these says anything about what headers are added to the message.
>>>
>>> X-Virus-Status: and X-Virus-Scanned: may be added to all of the messages
Am 27.09.18 um 00:34 schrieb Ted Hatfield:
> None of these says anything about what headers are added to the message.
>
> X-Virus-Status: and X-Virus-Scanned: may be added to all of the messages
> regardless of how the milter is configured
no
the whole purpose of this header is to signal if
On Thu, 27 Sep 2018, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 27.09.18 um 11:04 schrieb Arnaud Jacques:
I then restarted the milter. Unfortunately, the email is still marked as
Spam. I thought that clamav-milter would simply ignore the file.
X-Virus-Status: Infected (SecuriteInfo.com.Spam-4701.UNOFFICIAL)
Matus UHLAR - fantomas skrev den 2018-09-27 10:36:
On 26.09.18 07:56, Jerry wrote:
I am running clamav version 0.100.1 on a FreeBSD 11.2 / amd64 machine.
I
also have the clamav-milter installed. My problem is that even though
I am
trying to whitelist some addresses, they get marked as Spam.
Hello Jerry,
I then restarted the milter. Unfortunately, the email is still marked as
Spam. I thought that clamav-milter would simply ignore the file.
X-Virus-Status: Infected (SecuriteInfo.com.Spam-4701.UNOFFICIAL)
You can whitelist the signature this way :
On 26.09.18 07:56, Jerry wrote:
I am running clamav version 0.100.1 on a FreeBSD 11.2 / amd64 machine. I
also have the clamav-milter installed. My problem is that even though I am
trying to whitelist some addresses, they get marked as Spam.
spam? clamav is s virus scanner, not spam scanner.
Good morning. I am an administrator using Clamav for Linux server security. ClamAV is updating the Daily Signatures (Daily Policy) daily.Here is the question.I am currently using commercial antivirus software as a server for Windows and perform integrity verification when downloading Daily
On Thu, 27 Sep 2018, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 27.09.18 um 00:34 schrieb Ted Hatfield:
None of these says anything about what headers are added to the message.
X-Virus-Status: and X-Virus-Scanned: may be added to all of the messages
regardless of how the milter is configured
no
the whole
On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 14:29:25 -0500 (CDT), Ted Hatfield stated:
>On Wed, 26 Sep 2018, Jerry wrote:
>
>> I am running clamav version 0.100.1 on a FreeBSD 11.2 / amd64 machine. I
>> also have the clamav-milter installed. My problem is that even though I am
>> trying to whitelist some addresses, they
Jerry,
A quick google search comes up with this information from 2009.
Whitelisting is NOT based on the mail header fields (To:, From:) but on
the "MAIL FROM" and "RCPT TO" SMTP commands.
Is perhaps the "MAIL FROM" not the same as the From address.
Look at the full headers of the message
I am running clamav version 0.100.1 on a FreeBSD 11.2 / amd64 machine. I
also have the clamav-milter installed. My problem is that even though I am
trying to whitelist some addresses, they get marked as Spam.
This is an example of one such address: ☀ Puritan's Pride
I entered this into the
12 matches
Mail list logo
