From: Matt Garretson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Maybe I'm misunderstanding what you are doing, but wouldn't it be easier
just to use two separate, independent milters? Sendmail will filter each
message through them in sequence. In my setup, clamav-milter is first,
followed by spamassassin, and then a
Speedy Sweedy wrote:
Why am I doing to clamav-milter virus scans since mimedefang scans for
viruses you ask? Because I wanted to catch any virus and toss the
message before the overhead of mimedefang's milter starts up. (is also
does spamassassin too)
Would it be possible to have two
-users] Re: clamav and mimedefang
From: Matt Garretson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Maybe I'm misunderstanding what you are doing, but wouldn't it be easier
just to use two separate, independent milters? Sendmail will filter each
message through them in sequence. In my setup, clamav-milter is first,
followed
From: Mike Lambert Would it be possible to have two independant
installations of clamav, one configured for clamav-milter, one for
mimedefang?
I had decided this morning after doing tests all night to just implement MD
which calls clamav and Ken further convinced me of this once reading his
From: Cormack, Ken I use MD with clamd, on my gateways.
Thanks for your thoughts Ken, After watching my server last night I found
the same thing and have abandoned the thought of running clamav-milter by
itself. MD does a much better all round job of blocking email and viruses
using clamd
