On Sun, 9 May 2004, Kevin Spicer wrote:
I've put a little more work into my virus alias database (at
http://www.kevinspicer.co.uk)
What's the suggested method for dealing with the ClamAV-calls-it-
something-else problem?
I know other AV authors have this same issue, but they tend to have
On Mon, 2004-05-10 at 18:24, jef moskot wrote:
So, if I type in Netsky, I don't see any ties to SomeFool. If I put in
SomeFool, I don't see any immediate reference to Netsky, but if I poke
around a little, it becomes apparent that we're talking about the same
thing.
But if you put in
Marc a écrit :
Kevin Spicer wrote:
I've put up a proof-of-concept (read 'ugly') virus alias database at
http://www.kevinspicer.co.uk Its currently rather limited in that it
only fully indexes Clam, Fsecure and Symantec (although some aliases for
other vendors are picked up). If people feel it
I've put up a proof-of-concept (read 'ugly') virus alias database at
http://www.kevinspicer.co.uk Its currently rather limited in that it
only fully indexes Clam, Fsecure and Symantec (although some
aliases for
other vendors are picked up). If people feel it is worth
pursuing then
-users] Virus Alias Database
I've put up a proof-of-concept (read 'ugly') virus alias database at
http://www.kevinspicer.co.uk Its currently rather limited in that it
only fully indexes Clam, Fsecure and Symantec (although some aliases
for other vendors are picked up). If people feel
Kevin Spicer wrote:
I've put up a proof-of-concept (read 'ugly') virus alias database at
http://www.kevinspicer.co.uk Its currently rather limited in that it
only fully indexes Clam, Fsecure and Symantec (although some aliases for
other vendors are picked up). If people feel it is worth
