Ryan Moore wrote:
Lee W wrote:
Hi All,
I have just compiled ClamAV and have started playing out with it,
however after reading though the man pages I have been unable to find
an easy way of determining the current version or date of the Virus
DB files. The --version switch the freshclam only
On Saturday 19 June 2004 02:38 am, Lee W wrote:
Ryan Moore wrote:
Lee W wrote:
Hi All,
I have just compiled ClamAV and have started playing out with it,
however after reading though the man pages I have been unable to find
an easy way of determining the current version or date of the
A list member suggested running clamd as root (temporarily, of course).
Sendmail no longer complains. I'm getting the following error now...
clamav-milter[17693]: Expected port information from clamd, got ''
sm-mta[17703]: i5J2IuTg017703: Milter: data, reject=451 4.7.1 Please try
again
after having clamav up and running for a while -- it's great! thanks
to
all who develop || support it -- there's still another topic in status
'wip': how to uncompress .sit, .sitx, and .hqx files (usually
sent/received by Mac users)?
Seems that amavisd-new (an interface between MTA and virus
I've encountered this bug a few times:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# touch file1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# touch file2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# touch file3
[EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# ls
file1 file2 file3
[EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# clamdscan file1 file2 file3
ERROR: Can't access file file1 file2 file3
You might want to update your ports collection and try the latest
version of clamav. The latest is .73
Scott Rothgaber wrote:
Good Morning!
Some time ago I installed clamav from source on a FreeBSD 5.0 machine
that was also running Sendmail 8.12.10 and SA 2.63. Sendmail immediately
complained
On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 10:09:48 -0600, Dan Egli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I've encountered this bug a few times:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# touch file1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# touch file2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# touch file3
[EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# ls
file1 file2 file3
[EMAIL PROTECTED] test]#
Steven Stern wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 10:09:48 -0600, Dan Egli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I've encountered this bug a few times:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# touch file1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# touch file2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# touch file3
[EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# ls
file1 file2 file3
[EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 19 June 2004 12:14 pm, Dan Egli wrote:
Can someone kindly explain why on earth you would write a scanner that
only scans ONE FILE? The whole point of clamdscan is it's supposed to be
faster than clamscan because it let's the daemon do
Dan Egli wrote:
Steven Stern wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 10:09:48 -0600, Dan Egli
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I've encountered this bug a few times:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# touch file1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# touch file2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# touch file3
[EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# ls
file1
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 11:14:35AM -0600, Dan Egli said:
but I cannot scan a DIR either.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# clamdscan $PWD
/root: Can't access the file ERROR
--- SCAN SUMMARY ---
Infected files: 0
Time: 0.001 sec (0 m 0 s)
Can someone kindly explain why on
## Steven Stern ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
The same thing happens in 0.73. Reading the man page, it seems that it is a
WAD.
clamdscan [options] [file/directory]
clamdscan scans one file or one directory tree
clamscan works on multiple files.
Have a look at the source :)
-
Folks,
In my mail.log file, everything runs fine then
all of a sudden I have been seeing Requeuing: Maximum time exceeded.
Something cannot handle this message. at /var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl
line 529. I have to shutdown clamd (kill -9 usually, it never dies
down) remove the
On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 11:22:33 +0100 Nigel Horne
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A list member suggested running clamd as root
(temporarily, of course).
Sendmail no longer complains. I'm getting the following
error now...
clamav-milter[17693]: Expected port information from
clamd, got ''
14 matches
Mail list logo
