On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, Christopher McCrory wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:44:37 -0700, Christopher McCrory
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW , I updated to 0.75.1 today and it is working well. broken MIME
Mydoom.M are (almost all) caught and mem usage is at ~14M. 0.75 would
reach 1G ram then
Hi,
I recently installed clamav-milter 0.75 with sendmail 8.13.0 and I have
the following effect:
Clamav-milter modifies the Subject-line in the following cases:
The Postmaster-alert-message contains the subject
1) Virus intercepted\n\ton servername
2) Messages being generated by the
On Wednesday 04 Aug 2004 07:17, Damian Menscher wrote:
static const char *localAddresses[] = {
^127\\.0\\.0\\.1$,
^192\\.168\\.[0-9]*\\.[0-9]*$,
^172\\.1[6-9]\\.[0-9]*\\.[0-9]*$,
On Saturday 24 Jul 2004 18:52, Dan O'Brien wrote:
Additional information:
Virus: %v
Daemon Name:{daemon_name}
snip
0.75f now has improved template file handling. Thanks to you and to Sergey Y. Afonin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
for pushing me on this.
-Nigel
--
Nigel Horne. Arranger, Composer,
Jesse wrote:
2.) I'm thinking of writing a general purpose Email module for the OCaml
programming language. However, I think the ClamAV project is PROOF
that there are more ways to package email than any one person can
count. ASCII, Unicode, MIME, TNEF, UPX, Base64, etc... the
Dear all,
After upgraded to 0.75.1, the warning messages Virus intercepted are
queued on the mqueue, is it configurable in clamav.conf?
Thanks,
Martin Chan
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on
Linux.com,
Dear all,
After upgraded to 0.75.1, the warning messages Virus intercepted are
queued on the mqueue, is it configurable in clamav.conf?
Turn off scanning of local messages.
Thanks,
Martin Chan
-Nigel
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored
On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 23:01, Jeff Ramsey wrote:
On Aug 4, 2004, at 7:48 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Cody Dabb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 4:11 PM
Subject: [Clamav-users] Amavis-new and Clamd
What
Nigel Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
0.75f now has improved template file handling.
Most excellent!!
I'll give it a whirl when the next tarball is available.
Dan
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on
On Thu, 5 Aug 2004, Trog wrote:
The attached patch for clamav-0.75.1 will catch the files sent by
Mydoom.M that have been reported as binary fragments.
They will get reported as Mydoom.M.log
Is this a one-time patch-against-0.75.1 or something that will show up in
the development tree? I
On Thu, 2004-07-08 at 18:27, Nigel Horne wrote:
On Thursday 08 Jul 2004 18:43, Robert Schmidt wrote:
This is happening pretty frequently, 2 or 3 times per day. I upgraded
from .70 to .74 to see if it made any difference. It didn't.
Is 0.74b any better?
Thanks for your help in the past
Over the past few days I've had a few reports of a virus getting
through, and while the sig database has that virus listed (sigtool -l),
I don't see any blocks in my messages log. I'm still running a slightly
older version of clamav on most my boxes (0.72) since there were some
issues with the
On Thu, 5 Aug 2004, Ryan Moore wrote:
Over the past few days I've had a few reports of a virus getting
through, and while the sig database has that virus listed (sigtool -l),
I don't see any blocks in my messages log. I'm still running a slightly
older version of clamav on most my boxes
On 5 Aug 2004, at 09:09, Trog wrote:
The attached patch for clamav-0.75.1 will catch the files sent by
Mydoom.M that have been reported as binary fragments.
They will get reported as Mydoom.M.log
Thanks,
-trog
mydoom-log.diff
This 'MIGHT' be a dumb question, but then I might be dumb !!
How would
On Thursday 05 August 2004 12:46 pm, Ryan Moore wrote:
Such that if freshclam downloads a signature and if the
signature has a 'engine version requirement' or some attribute that can
be compared against the installed engine, if the installed engine isn't
newer, give a nasty warning in the log.
Nigel Horne wrote:
Dear all,
After upgraded to 0.75.1, the warning messages Virus intercepted are
queued on the mqueue, is it configurable in clamav.conf?
Turn off scanning of local messages.
But...that means that an infected machine on the LAN will be able to
send emails contained viruses using
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Thursday 05 August 2004 12:46 pm, Ryan Moore wrote:
Such that if freshclam downloads a signature and if the
signature has a 'engine version requirement' or some attribute that can
be compared against the installed engine, if the installed engine isn't
newer, give a nasty
This is predicated on the developers of the database incrementing the
functionality level when they make changes like this.
I'm still not sure I get it, but there seems to be some resistance to doing
this consistantly.
Some changes in detection seem to make it into CVS, and I think future
On 5 Aug 2004, at 20:29, Robert wrote:
On 5 Aug 2004, at 09:09, Trog wrote:
The attached patch for clamav-0.75.1 will catch the files sent by
Mydoom.M that have been reported as binary fragments.
They will get reported as Mydoom.M.log
Thanks,
-trog
mydoom-log.diff
This 'MIGHT' be a dumb question,
On Thursday 05 Aug 2004 21:41, Matias Lopez Bergero wrote:
Nigel Horne wrote:
Dear all,
After upgraded to 0.75.1, the warning messages Virus intercepted are
queued on the mqueue, is it configurable in clamav.conf?
Turn off scanning of local messages.
But...that means that an
I'm running Sendmail, Mailscanner, Spamassasin, and Clamav (0.70rc-1). I
would like to upgrade Clamav. Tried yum but it continues to tell me there
are no updates available. So on to plan two. I'm going to install from the
RPMs but wasn't exactly sure of the process.
This is my plan.
1. Stop
Dear users,
the development version of ClamAV is mature enough to start using it
instead of 0.7x stable releases. Please give it a try and report all
bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you !
http://www.clamav.net/snapshot/clamav-20040805.tar.gz
The above snapshot includes a new, memory efficient
Mitch (WebCob) wrote:
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Thursday 05 August 2004 12:46 pm, Ryan Moore wrote:
Such that if freshclam downloads a signature and if the
signature has a 'engine version requirement' or some attribute that can
be compared against the installed engine, if the installed engine
Ken Goods wrote:
I'm running Sendmail, Mailscanner, Spamassasin, and Clamav (0.70rc-1). I
would like to upgrade Clamav. Tried yum but it continues to tell me there
are no updates available. So on to plan two. I'm going to install from the
RPMs but wasn't exactly sure of the process.
This is my
Ken Goods wrote:
I'm running Sendmail, Mailscanner, Spamassasin, and Clamav (0.70rc-1). I
would like to upgrade Clamav. Tried yum but it continues to tell me there
are no updates available. So on to plan two. I'm going to install from the
RPMs but wasn't exactly sure of the process.
This is my
Christopher McCrory wanted us to know:
Once per week we send a newsletter out to many people. This takes ~10
hours as it's not very optimized. One message per receipent, not one
message - many.
clamd keeps failing over
I added --dont-scan-on-error to the clamav-milter args, the
frequency was
On Fri, 06 Aug 2004 00:08:55 +0200
Thomas Lamy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IIRC freshclam doesn't even update the local database if your local
installation has a too small functionality level. I guess it was
Even if the f-level is smaller than required one freshclam still
attempts to update
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
Dear users,
the development version of ClamAV is mature enough to start using it
instead of 0.7x stable releases. Please give it a try and report all
bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you !
http://www.clamav.net/snapshot/clamav-20040805.tar.gz
The above snapshot includes a new
Thomas Lamy scribbled on Thursday, August 05, 2004 3:24 PM:
Ken Goods wrote:
I'm running Sendmail, Mailscanner, Spamassasin, and Clamav
(0.70rc-1). I would like to upgrade Clamav. Tried yum but it
continues to tell me there are no updates available. So on to plan
two. I'm going to install
Peter Bonivart scribbled on Thursday, August 05, 2004 3:23 PM:
Ken Goods wrote:
I'm running Sendmail, Mailscanner, Spamassasin, and Clamav
(0.70rc-1). I would like to upgrade Clamav. Tried yum but it
continues to tell me there are no updates available. So on to plan
two. I'm going to install
On Thursday 05 August 2004 07:44 pm, René Bellora wrote:
bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you !
I'm testing against old viruses, it seems to miss JS.FortNight.B. Same
files, with 0.75 and same signatures are caught
*cough*
-Jeremy
--
Jeremy Kitchen ++ Systems Administrator ++ Inter7
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Thursday 05 August 2004 07:44 pm, René Bellora wrote:
bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you !
I'm testing against old viruses, it seems to miss JS.FortNight.B. Same
files, with 0.75 and same signatures are caught
*cough*
Hi,
What's that mean Jeremy ?
Regards,
Rick
Rick Macdougall wrote:
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Thursday 05 August 2004 07:44 pm, René Bellora wrote:
bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you !
I'm testing against old viruses, it seems to miss JS.FortNight.B. Same
files, with 0.75 and same signatures are caught
*cough*
Hi,
What's that mean Jeremy
Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
Rick Macdougall wrote:
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Thursday 05 August 2004 07:44 pm, René Bellora wrote:
bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you !
I'm testing against old viruses, it seems to miss JS.FortNight.B. Same
files, with 0.75 and same signatures are caught
*cough*
Hi,
On Fri, 6 Aug 2004, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
Rick Macdougall wrote:
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Thursday 05 August 2004 07:44 pm, René Bellora wrote:
bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you !
I'm testing against old viruses, it seems to miss JS.FortNight.B. Same
files, with 0.75 and same
35 matches
Mail list logo
