Михаил Исаев wrote:
ClamAV version - snapshot 20061026 (also testing v0.90RC1.1)
OS - Solaris 5.9 (with updated zlib v1.2.3, gcc v3.4.0)
I have a problem with clamav-milter: it's die when freshclam gots errors.
See also bug 113.
--
Nigel Horne. Arranger, Adjudicator, Band Trainer, Composer,
Hi, Nigel.
See also bug 113.
I can't see this bug: You are not authorized to access bug #113 (i am logged in to Bugzilla before
search). Can you post this bug here?
Best regards,
Michael Isaev
___
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 09:52:11 +0900
Михаил Исаев [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ClamAV version - snapshot 20061026 (also testing v0.90RC1.1)
OS - Solaris 5.9 (with updated zlib v1.2.3, gcc v3.4.0)
Do you use the experimental code (--enable-experimental)?
--
oo. Tomasz Kojm [EMAIL
For some reason or the other I cannot get clamav 0.90RC1.1 to
behave itself. I have a similar clamd.conf that I do for 0.88.5 yet
when I try to start clamav-milter afterwards, it states that clamd is missing.
Using 127.0.0.1/3310 method.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
On 30/10/2006 08:58, Михаил Исаев wrote:
Hi, Nigel.
See also bug 113.
I can't see this bug: You are not authorized to access bug #113 (i am
logged in to Bugzilla before search). Can you post this bug here?
Here it is:
Description: [reply]Opened: 2006-10-28 15:16
On two Fedora Core
* On 30/10/06 05:31 -0700, Dave Shariff Yadallee - System Administrator a.k.a.
The Root of the Problem wrote:
| For some reason or the other I cannot get clamav 0.90RC1.1 to
| behave itself. I have a similar clamd.conf that I do for 0.88.5 yet
| when I try to start clamav-milter afterwards, it
Kris Deugau wrote:
From the problems I'm having with supposedly malformed signatures, it
looks like there's an effective complexity limit; from the problems in
*matching* a signature that's finally been found to be acceptable, it
looks like there's a (lower) limit on what Clam can actually
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:35:13 +0100
aCaB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, this:
474946383761??(01|00)??0044
Should really read:
47494638376144
Or even
474946383761??0(0|1)??0044
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 07:48:46 +1300
Steve Holdoway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:35:13 +0100
aCaB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, this:
474946383761??(01|00)??0044
Should really read:
47494638376144
Or even
474946383761??0(0|1)??0044
Sorry, scrap that.
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:35:13 +0100
aCaB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kris Deugau wrote:
Steve Holdoway wrote:
Or even
474946383761??0(0|1)??0044
Nope! Bytes only, no nibbles.
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
with 0.9x
Indeed! :)
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
aCaB wrote:
Kris Deugau wrote:
ImgSpam.Misc.5:0:0:474946383761??(01|00)??00442c??(01|00)??0084(00|48|53)(00|15)(00|30|1c)f0f0f0(f0|e0|c0)f0(e0|b0|f0|d0|c0)f0(00|f0|40)(00|d0|e0|60|70)(f0|90|00|c0)(e0|90|00|b0|70)f0??(00|90|40|7d|10)(f0|ea)??(f0|00|e0|d0|46)
Hi Kris,
There are a
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
A few corrections :-)
Ah! The Voice of Authority! g
aCaB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) you always need at least 2 static bytes before and after a wildcard
(though a serie of ?? is fine)
with 0.9x it's enough to have a block of 2 static bytes somewhere in a part
of
Hello all,
So I have been seeing all these people putting together 3rd party
signatures for clamav, and been quite pleased with the community effort
that has sprung up around this. My only thought on seeing all of this
was that there was no simple, freshclam like method for grabbing all of
these
Stephen Gran wrote:
Hello all,
So I have been seeing all these people putting together 3rd party
signatures for clamav, and been quite pleased with the community effort
that has sprung up around this. My only thought on seeing all of this
was that there was no simple, freshclam like method for
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 06:45:04PM -0800, Dennis Peterson said:
Did you include a randomizer so everyone doesn't hit Steve's server on
the hour? :) I provide a feed for a URLBL list and it's surprising how
many people cron a job to run on the hour.
No, that's another thing in the works.
17 matches
Mail list logo