Re: [clamav-users] Question about the clamdscan

2018-03-21 Thread Dave Warren
This still has value as it can help catch things in action. It doesn't replace periodic scans either to catch malware discovered since the initial scan. There are a variety of ways of doing this if scanning everything in one shot isn't feasible. One option would be to split files up using a

Re: [clamav-users] Question about the clamdscan

2018-03-21 Thread Dennis Peterson
Tripwire presumes a golden fileset at the outset, that is, scanned to the degree possible before enabling Tripwire. The fear of zero-day loop is infinite. dp On 3/21/18 6:41 PM, Paul Kosinski wrote: A few years ago, when Tripwire was no longer free, I set up a "scan once" environment for

Re: [clamav-users] Question about the clamdscan

2018-03-21 Thread Paul Kosinski
A few years ago, when Tripwire was no longer free, I set up a "scan once" environment for ClamAV, identifying files using SHA1 hashing (with a few 'stat' results like inode and timestamp for good measure). I gave up when I realized that even if a file had already been scanned, it might have

Re: [clamav-users] Question about the clamdscan

2018-03-21 Thread Dennis Peterson
It is possible to integrate ClamAV and Tripwire to get to a scan-once environment. Include puppet or CFEngine for a more complete tool. dp On 3/20/18 5:01 AM, Micah Snyder (micasnyd) wrote: Good morning Tsutomu, Al is quite correct. clamd and clamdscan maintain no memory of what has been