Re: [clamav-users] We STILL cannot reliably get virus updates (since new mirrors)

I looked at a bunch of pages on Cloudflare's site. What they offer is quite impressive -- way beyond "mere" distributed/anycast CDN. On Tue, 10 Jul 2018 22:13:49 -0400 Eric Tykwinski wrote: > They have some documentation on their site: > https://support.cloudflare.com/hc/en-us/articles/11500054

Re: [clamav-users] We STILL cannot reliably get virus updates (since new mirrors)

They have some documentation on their site: https://support.cloudflare.com/hc/en-us/articles/115000540888-Load-Balancing-Geographic-Regions No clue what regions they are using, but hopefully they do

Re: [clamav-users] We STILL cannot reliably get virus updates (since new mirrors)

Joel posted pictures (in one of these update thread) of where the mirrors are located along with the relative traffic that each one transfers. Cheers, Freddie Typos courtesy of my phone's keyboard. On Tue, Jul 10, 2018, 6:37 PM Paul Kosinski, wrote: > I have a question. I presume that there ar

Re: [clamav-users] We STILL cannot reliably get virus updates (since new mirrors)

I have a question. I presume that there are more physical Cloudflare server instances than implied by database.clamav.net's 5 IP addresses, and that they are geographically distributed, rather than all being in/near San Francisco. This suggests that they are Anycast addresses. But I don't know how

Re: [clamav-users] clamav-milter with sendmail on Fedora 28: init failed to open, to error state, initialization failed, temp failing commands

On Tue, 10 Jul 2018, Robert Kudyba wrote: >Hello hive, > >Running: >clamav-0.100.0-2.fc28.x86_64 > >clamd, freshclam and clamav-milter all up and running: >ps -auwx | grep clam >clamupd+ 20336 0.0 0.0 50672 4016 ?Ss Jun29 1:15 >/usr/bin/freshclam -d -c 4 >clamav 23713 0.0 0.0 1

Re: [clamav-users] We STILL cannot reliably get virus updates (since new mirrors)

Thanks for this feedback everyone. This is extremely useful. > On Jul 10, 2018, at 11:26 AM, Paul Kosinski wrote: > > Last night our new method of getting cvd updates showed that it was > *one hour* from the time the DNS TXT record claimed a new cvd was > available to the time when our quick c

[clamav-users] clamav-milter with sendmail on Fedora 28: init failed to open, to error state, initialization failed, temp failing commands

Hello hive, Running: clamav-0.100.0-2.fc28.x86_64 clamd, freshclam and clamav-milter all up and running: ps -auwx | grep clam clamupd+ 20336 0.0 0.0 50672 4016 ?Ss Jun29 1:15 /usr/bin/freshclam -d -c 4 clamav 23713 0.0 0.0 176780 1160 ?Ssl 13:23 0:00 /usr/sbin/clam

Re: [clamav-users] Bytecode 86 failed to run

This issue should be resolved now. If the issue persists for you, let us know. - Alain On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 12:14 AM, wrote: > On my debian 9, clamav 0.100.0+dfsg-0+deb8u1) I got following error: > > clamscan /media/6b300944-6e7c-493e-b9c9-faeebb70a415/nastenka > /srv/dev-disk-by-label-white/

Re: [clamav-users] We STILL cannot reliably get virus updates (since new mirrors)

Last night our new method of getting cvd updates showed that it was *one hour* from the time the DNS TXT record claimed a new cvd was available to the time when our quick curl said it was really available! In particular at 1:03 AM (EDT), DNS said version 24739 was available, but a curl of the firs

[clamav-users] LibClamAV Warning: RWX mapping denied

This morning, a bunch of RHEL6 systems greeted me with mails saying: /etc/cron.daily/freshclam: ERROR: During database load : LibClamAV Warning: RWX mapping denied: Can't allocate RWX Memory: Permission denied I found an old Red Hat Bugzilla entry (Bug 1172774) for Fedora 21 which was closed as