hi all,
i am getting this message from my server every once in a while:
Cron [EMAIL PROTECTED] nice -n 19 run-parts /etc/cron.daily
run-parts: /etc/cron.daily/freshclam exited with return code 1
error: Ignoring xdm.rpmnew, because of .rpmnew ending
is something wrong?
cheers,
phil
Sorry if this is a FAQ - I've searched and can't find anything about it
anywhere..
We have a commercial product, which we want to keep commercial. It's some
email server software, which has the capability to run an external virus
scanner (currently it supports several commercial virus
IANAL. Take my answers below with a grain of salt.
On Monday 21 June 2004 04:04 am, Paul Smith wrote:
There are several possibilities I've come up with:
- add support for our software to either load libclamav or talk to clamd
directly, if those things are installed. This seems to me that we'd
On Monday 21 June 2004 04:45 am, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
IANAL. Take my answers below with a grain of salt.
[snip]
that would be horribly infectious. That's like saying Ooo, I wrote an
GPL'd for outlook, now microsoft has to give me their source!
*cough*
GPL'd plugin.
-Jeremy
--
Jeremy
On Mon, 2004-06-21 at 10:04 +0100, Paul Smith wrote:
Sorry if this is a FAQ - I've searched and can't find anything about it
anywhere..
I think this is more of a gpl FAQ
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/licenses.html#GPL
I believe any linking directly or indirectly (via a shim as you suggest)
is a
Nigel Horne wrote:
Are you running clamd with INET or UNIX domain sockets? If the former
try telneting to clamd and see if it talks.
If he's using FreeBSD, he can also telnet to a Unix socket with 'telnet
-u /path/to/socket':
-
cgreen:VMail1:/home/cgreen# telnet -u
As Designed, if this really is as designed, is IMO, a REALLY DUMB
design. Defeats the whole idea of a daemon.
If I remember correctly, you're complaining that the clamdscan only
scans a single file at a time. This is not even a little
contradictory, the point of the daemon is to decrease the
The Norton Antivirus running on our mail server is catching the virus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] which appears to be getting past Clamav.
--
Michael St. Laurent
Hartwell Corporation
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference
I was wondering if false positives ever make it into the virus DB updates?
Since the update on Jun18, all of my windows 2000 workstations with
Service Pack 4 are showing what I beleive to be false positives for
Worm.Lovgate.W-2. The file in question is spoolsv.exe and can be fond in:
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 10:04:39 +0100
Paul Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a commercial product, which we want to keep commercial. It's
some email server software, which has the capability to run an
[...]
There are several possibilities I've come up with:
- add support for our software
On Monday 21 June 2004 06:54 am, John Leach wrote:
I don't believe talking to the daemon via TCP/IP (or even a socket)
would be a violation [of the GPL], but along with Jeremy, IANAL (I can sleep
at
night).
I don't see how it possibly could be. That'd be ludicrous.
-Jeremy
--
Jeremy
ClamAV is happily scanning all my incoming mail. However, it never
finds a virus. I have tested it with known viruses, I have scanned
suspect mail that arrived with a local virus scanner on my Mac and
found viruses that slipped by and I have used on-line virus tests to
send test files.
On Monday 21 June 2004 04:04 pm, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
However you cannot:
- link against libclamav
- directly use the virus databases
- include our code in your software (obvious ;-))
could he write a shim that is LGPL'd that links to libclamav?
-Jeremy
--
Jeremy Kitchen ++ Systems
IANAL. Take my answers below with a grain of salt.
Of course :-)
- our software supports 'shim' DLLs with a standard interface which can
talk to a third party antivirus product to add the capability for more
virus scanners without recompilation. WE could make one of those to talk to
clamav
My server's clamd (0.73) has starting dyeing off regularly again (every
10-30 minutes). I've managed to capture some debug information, but somehow
haven't gotten it to make a core file yet.
Again, compiled under gcc 3.4.0, Solaris 8 on UltraSparc hardware (Sun Ultra
2)
Output from running
On Monday 21 June 2004 10:41 am, Paul Smith wrote:
IANAL. Take my answers below with a grain of salt.
Of course :-)
- our software supports 'shim' DLLs with a standard interface which can
talk to a third party antivirus product to add the capability for more
virus scanners without
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 10:48:05 -0500
Jeremy Kitchen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 21 June 2004 04:04 pm, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
However you cannot:
- link against libclamav
- directly use the virus databases
- include our code in your software (obvious ;-))
could he write a shim that
On Monday 21 June 2004 04:04, Paul Smith wrote:
We have a commercial product, which we want to keep commercial. It's some
email server software, which has the capability to run an external virus
scanner (currently it supports several commercial virus scanners)
We tend to either use commercial
On Mon, 2004-06-21 at 17:02, Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
My server's clamd (0.73) has starting dyeing off regularly again (every
10-30 minutes). I've managed to capture some debug information, but somehow
haven't gotten it to make a core file yet.
Again, compiled under gcc 3.4.0,
Hi guys,
I've downloaded the latest version 0.73, and i used the same ./configure
options i did with the last version
./configure --enable-milter --sysconfdir=/etc --prefix=/usr
but somehow, when i do make i dont see clamav-milter compiled
Making all in clamav-milter
make[2]: Entering
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004, Trog wrote:
Are there any files left in this directory:
LibClamAV debug: Saving attachment in
/tmp/clamav/clamav-5bce8e8e51ede379/textportion
clamav-5bce8e8e51ede379 is no longer there, although there are a number of
leftover directories. I'll see what happens next
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 06:20:14PM -0400, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
- link against libclamav
- directly use the virus databases
- include our code in your software (obvious ;-))
could he write a shim that is LGPL'd that links to libclamav?
Well, I don't know. This is a question to a lawyer.
On Monday 21 Jun 2004 17:33, Raul Elizondo wrote:
./configure --enable-milter --sysconfdir=/etc --prefix=/usr
but somehow, when i do make i dont see clamav-milter compiled
Regards,
-=Raul=-
PD: i am usting RH9
Do you have the 'sendmail-devel' RPM installed?
-Nigel
--
Nigel Horne.
Going through the debug output since the last crash, I see about 20 errors
where a VBA scan dir failed on a can't open. It seems to be in the same
context as when the last crash occurred. Here is an example:
LibClamAV debug: Recognized OLE2 container file
LibClamAV debug: in cli_scanole2()
Do you have the 'sendmail-devel' RPM installed?
-Nigel
I just figured it out before i got this answer. Now it compiles, thanks
-=Raul=-
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings
Michael St. Laurent wrote:
The Norton Antivirus running on our mail server is catching the virus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] which appears to be getting past Clamav.
Please disregard. The autoupdater was not working. Erkez is detected by
Clamav as Zafi. My mistake.
--
Michael St. Laurent
Hartwell
Here's the latest crash output:
LibClamAV debug: Recognized Raw mail file
LibClamAV debug: Starting cli_scanmail(), reclev 3
LibClamAV debug: in mbox()
LibClamAV debug: Recognized Raw mail file
LibClamAV debug: Deal with header Received: by clamd
LibClamAV debug: parseEmailHeader 'Received: by
According to the FAQ and the configure script I need to install GNU MP
on my Solaris 8 system so that clam will support digital signatures.
I've installed GMP 2.0.2, 3.1, and 4.1.3 on test systems and none will
satisfy the configure script. What am I missing?
Thomas Jackson wrote:
According to the FAQ and the configure script I need to install GNU MP
on my Solaris 8 system so that clam will support digital signatures.
I've installed GMP 2.0.2, 3.1, and 4.1.3 on test systems and none will
satisfy the configure script. What am I missing?
Did you set
If you don't like the software, and are unhappy about how much you paid
for it, contact the Clamav team and ask for a job.
Just my 2 cents.
Phil
On Jun 20, 2004, at 10:25 PM, Dan Egli wrote:
Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
Dan Egli wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# clamdscan $PWD
/root: Can't access the
I'm slowly building a virus scanner for use with my MTA. I'd prefer to
avoid juggling temp files, and want to send things to clamscan via
stdin. But, clamscan doesn't detect things when passed via stdin.
using clamscan 0.73 as downloaded today, and the test virus files on
fedora: (0 is clean, 1
Philip Ershler wrote:
If you don't like the software, and are unhappy about how much you paid
for it, contact the Clamav team and ask for a job.
Just my 2 cents.
Phil
First, it was just a suggestion!
Second, Fix your clock! It's not 11 pm Sunday!
--
-- Dan
It was when I composed this message. I just couldn't get connected to a
network until this morning. I was really quite serious. If you want to
make a contribution, contact the the Clamav team.
Phil
On Jun 21, 2004, at 1:35 PM, Dan Egli wrote:
Philip Ershler wrote:
If you don't like the
Benjamin Sherman said:
I was wondering if false positives ever make it into the virus DB updates?
Since the update on Jun18, all of my windows 2000 workstations with
Service Pack 4 are showing what I beleive to be false positives for
Worm.Lovgate.W-2. The file in question is spoolsv.exe and
Philipp Ringli wanted us to know:
hi all,
i am getting this message from my server every once in a while:
Cron [EMAIL PROTECTED] nice -n 19 run-parts /etc/cron.daily
run-parts: /etc/cron.daily/freshclam exited with return code 1
error: Ignoring xdm.rpmnew, because of .rpmnew ending
is something
On Mon, 2004-06-21 at 16:05, Benjamin Sherman wrote:
I was wondering if false positives ever make it into the virus DB updates?
They do
Since the update on Jun18, all of my windows 2000 workstations with
Service Pack 4 are showing what I beleive to be false positives for
Worm.Lovgate.W-2.
Phil Ershler wrote:
It was when I composed this message. I just couldn't get connected to a
network until this morning. I was really quite serious. If you want to
make a contribution, contact the the Clamav team.
Phil
I would if I could code in C. I cann't do C to save my life. It has
always
Sumbitted. Thanks for the suggestion... I hadn't realized one could
submit false positives.
Kevin Spicer wrote:
On Mon, 2004-06-21 at 16:05, Benjamin Sherman wrote:
I was wondering if false positives ever make it into the virus DB updates?
They do
Since the update on Jun18, all of my windows
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 at 15:02:45 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Benjamin Sherman said:
I was wondering if false positives ever make it into the virus DB updates?
Since the update on Jun18, all of my windows 2000 workstations with
Service Pack 4 are showing what I beleive to be false
Tomasz Papszun wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 at 15:02:45 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Benjamin Sherman said:
I was wondering if false positives ever make it into the virus DB updates?
Since the update on Jun18, all of my windows 2000 workstations with
Service Pack 4 are showing what I beleive to
I've tested mimedefang SA and clamav and everything went nicely. Now
comes the install of said software on two solaris 8 systems and clamav
is acting up on one of the systems.
Every so often clamav is dieing. I would like to get a little more
information about the crash. I've turned on verbose
Setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH and copying a header file to /usr/include
worked.
On Mon, 2004-06-21 at 12:04, Peter Bonivart wrote:
Thomas Jackson wrote:
According to the FAQ and the configure script I need to install GNU MP
on my Solaris 8 system so that clam will support digital signatures.
ClamAV is happily scanning all my incoming mail. However, it never
finds a virus. I have tested it with known viruses, I have scanned
suspect mail that arrived with a local virus scanner on my Mac and
found viruses that slipped by and I have used on-line virus tests to
send test files.
Tomasz Papszun said:
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 at 15:02:45 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Benjamin Sherman said:
I was wondering if false positives ever make it into the virus DB
updates?
Since the update on Jun18, all of my windows 2000 workstations with
Service Pack 4 are showing what I
sorry. i am a bloody beginner...
this is what i could find:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] stats]# locate xdm
/usr/share/doc/HOWTO/HTML/en/XDM-Xterm/xdm-advconfig.html
/usr/share/doc/HOWTO/HTML/en/XDM-Xterm/xdm.html
/usr/share/doc/HOWTO/HTML/en/XFree-Local-multi-user/dm_conf-xdm_kdm.html
/usr/X11R6/bin/xdm
On Monday 21 June 2004 11:11 pm, Philipp Ringli wrote:
sorry. i am a bloody beginner...
this is what i could find:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] stats]# locate xdm
/usr/share/doc/HOWTO/HTML/en/XDM-Xterm/xdm-advconfig.html
/usr/share/doc/HOWTO/HTML/en/XDM-Xterm/xdm.html
Dan Egli wrote:
Phil Ershler wrote:
It was when I composed this message. I just couldn't get connected to
a network until this morning. I was really quite serious. If you want
to make a contribution, contact the the Clamav team.
Phil
I would if I could code in C. I cann't do C to save my life.
Antony Stone wanted us to know:
/etc/pam.d/xdm
/etc/pam.d/xdm.rpmnew
/etc/logrotate.d/xdm
/etc/logrotate.d/xdm.rpmnew
so which one shal i eliminate?
Rather than searching for xdm (which is what you want to leave in place) you
would have got a shorter output from a search for xdm.rpmnew
Well, can you give me a starting point to check the config? I guess
this is where I am stuck at this point. I have checked the config to
the best of my knowledge. It used to work perfectly on my previous
version but after updating both ClamAV and cgpav, it has since stopped.
I kept my old
Well, can you give me a starting point to check the config? I guess
this is where I am stuck at this point. I have checked the config to
the best of my knowledge. It used to work perfectly on my previous
version but after updating both ClamAV and cgpav, it has since stopped.
I kept
Philipp Ringli wrote:
sorry. i am a bloody beginner...
We all have to start somewhere.
/etc/logrotate.d/xdm.rpmnew
so which one shal i eliminate?
That one. And xdm.rpmnew has nothing to do with clam. You're seeing two
different messages in the logwatch. logrotate ignores files ending in
On 22.06.2004, at 02:17, Dan Egli wrote:
Philipp Ringli wrote:
sorry. i am a bloody beginner...
We all have to start somewhere.
/etc/logrotate.d/xdm.rpmnew
so which one shal i eliminate?
That one. And xdm.rpmnew has nothing to do with clam. You're seeing
two different messages in the logwatch.
However you cannot:
- directly use the virus databases
How come?
As far as I know, copyright law doesn't protect databases.
--
damjan |
This is my jabber ID -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- not my mail address!!!
---
This SF.Net email sponsored
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 03:30:19AM +0200, Damjan wrote the following:
However you cannot:
- directly use the virus databases
How come?
As far as I know, copyright law doesn't protect databases.
You haven't been keeping up. Congress is pushing really hard (if they
haven't already passed
Okie let me try and give you guys more details
OS: RH 9
Clamav : 0.72
GCC: gcc version 3.2.2 20030222
Error i am getting from log/maillog
Jun 22 02:47:43 sendmail[15427]: i5M1lhE9015427: Milter (clmilter): local
socket name /var/run/clamav/clmilter.sock unsafe
Jun 22 02:47:43 sendmail[15427]:
Philipp Ringli wrote:
That one. And xdm.rpmnew has nothing to do with clam. You're seeing
two different messages in the logwatch. logrotate ignores files ending
in .rpm[new|old]. That is one error. The other, indicating frashclam
existed with a return code of 1 is completely unrelated. I'd run
On Tuesday 22 Jun 2004 02:55, sarky wrote:
Error i am getting from log/maillog
Jun 22 02:47:43 sendmail[15427]: i5M1lhE9015427: Milter (clmilter): local
socket name /var/run/clamav/clmilter.sock unsafe
Jun 22 02:47:43 sendmail[15427]: i5M1lhE9015427: Milter (clmilter): to
error state
Have
57 matches
Mail list logo
