Samuel Benzaquen wrote:
I can also say that they don't want to compete against commercial AV vendors
as I have read here 2^32 times that we should use not _only_ clamav, but a
list of AVs to improve the chances to catch malware.
That you're being recommended not to only use ClamAV does not
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 17:01:48 -0400, Samuel Benzaquen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can also say that they don't want to compete against commercial AV vendors
as I have read here 2^32 times that we should use not _only_ clamav, but a
list of AVs to improve the chances to catch malware.
Best
Hi list!
I want to run freshclam with daemontools but freshclam just doesn't seem to
know the -f option.
/usr/local/bin/freshclam -h tells me there is an -f option but
``/usr/local/bin/freshclam -d -f -c 12''
will just result in
/usr/local/bin/freshclam: invalid option -- f
ERROR: Unknown option
Hi,
My objective is to scan all mails and block / tag spam mails.
While searching online, I have found many one suggesting to install below
combination:
Sendmail + Clamav with milter + MailScanner + Spamassassin
Is the above combination correct to fullfill my objective?
Now, I'm confused why
On 3/22/2005 11:30 AM +0100, Lukas Feiler wrote:
Hi list!
I want to run freshclam with daemontools but freshclam just doesn't seem to
know the -f option.
/usr/local/bin/freshclam -h tells me there is an -f option but
``/usr/local/bin/freshclam -d -f -c 12''
will just result in
does any one can point me to a site where i can download the whole
stuff[rpm's stuff{milter,clamav etc..} and other educational resources on
clamav also]
Regards
Rupak
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
cool, it works!
thanks a lot,
Lukas
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Niek
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 12:05 PM
To: ClamAV users ML
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] freshclam -f daemontools
On 3/22/2005 11:30 AM +0100, Lukas
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, Rob MacGregor wrote:
From: Rob MacGregor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ClamAV users ML clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 09:58:17 +
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Report Phishing attacks?
Reply-To: ClamAV users ML clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
On Mon, 21
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 16:49:51 +0545 (NPT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
does any one can point me to a site where i can download the whole
stuff[rpm's stuff{milter,clamav etc..} and other educational resources on
clamav also]
Ever heard of http://www.clamav.net ?
--Frank Elsner
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 16:49:51 +0545 (NPT), [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
does any one can point me to a site where i can download the whole
stuff[rpm's stuff{milter,clamav etc..} and other educational resources on
clamav also]
http://www.clamav.net/
http://www.rpmfind.net/
--
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 at 12:47:54 -0600, Sam wrote:
How does one go about getting the text for JS.Scramble to put into the
user.db file? Is there a location for strings that have been pulled out?
If you mean JS.Spam.Scramble.A, please find it attached.
Disclaimer: use it at your own risk.
Hello,
Please, someone can explain to me, what is milter ?
Thanks.
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Matt Fretwell wrote:
that calls the restective programmes
^^
That should say 'respective' :)
Matt
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Victor wrote:
Hello,
Please, someone can explain to me, what is milter ?
Short form:
A plugin for Sendmail.
Matt
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Hello,
Clarified my question.
Thanks !
- Original Message -
From: Matt Fretwell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ClamAV users ML clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 8:54 AM
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] what is milter ?
Victor wrote:
Hello,
Please, someone can
On Mar 21, 2005, at 5:10 PM, Brian Morrison wrote:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 20:06:02 +0100 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Julian Mehnle
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brian Morrison wrote:
Julian Mehnle wrote:
Probably more like: can we have 'technical-threats.cvd' and
'non-technical-threats.cvd' instead of
On Mar 22, 2005, at 6:35 AM, Dennis Davis wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, Rob MacGregor wrote:
From: Rob MacGregor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ClamAV users ML clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 09:58:17 +
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Report Phishing attacks?
Reply-To: ClamAV users ML
On Mar 22, 2005, at 4:58 AM, Rob MacGregor wrote:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 17:01:48 -0400, Samuel Benzaquen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can also say that they don't want to compete against commercial AV
vendors
as I have read here 2^32 times that we should use not _only_ clamav,
but a
list of AVs to
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
From: Bart Silverstrim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ClamAV users ML clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 07:40:18 -0500
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Report Phishing attacks?
...
I believe this is what the commercial anti-virus company,
I have just encountered a problem:
clamscan --unrar
works good only if archive has extension .rar
This behavior was found on Debian sarge and on SUSE9.0:
here follows some example:
$ clamscan --unrar clam-error.rar
/home/lel/tmp/clam-error.rar: RAR module failure
UNRAR 3.30 freeware Copyright
Hi Victor,
I think these site will be helpful for you also:
http://milter.free.fr/intro/
http://linux.sgms-centre.com/howto/sendmailclamav.php
Regards
Nabin Limbu
On 22 Mar 2005 at 8:51, Victor wrote:
Hello,
Please, someone can explain to me, what is milter ?
Thanks.
Hi,
What are the benefits of using 3rd party software like Mailscanner, Mimedefang
and
many others with clamav? Why do people use when it can be done simply with
clamav-milter and spamassassin.
Regards
Nabin Limbu
On 22 Mar 2005 at 11:51, Matt Fretwell wrote:
Nabin Limbu wrote:
Sendmail
Nabin Limbu wrote:
What are the benefits of using 3rd party software like Mailscanner,
Mimedefang and many others with clamav? Why do people use when it can be
done simply with clamav-milter and spamassassin.
Generally, it is purely for extra options and configurability. The likes
of
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 19:33:03 +0530, Nabin Limbu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
What are the benefits of using 3rd party software like Mailscanner,
Mimedefang and
many others with clamav? Why do people use when it can be done simply with
clamav-milter and spamassassin.
Efficiency - it's
Alexander Lelyakin wrote:
I have just encountered a problem:
clamscan --unrar
works good only if archive has extension .rar
Following command:
$ cat clam-error.rar | clamscan --unrar -
also does not catch viruses
___
On Tuesday 22 Mar 2005 14:27, Rob MacGregor wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 19:33:03 +0530, Nabin Limbu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
What are the benefits of using 3rd party software like Mailscanner,
Mimedefang and
many others with clamav? Why do people use when it can be done simply with
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, Tomasz Papszun wrote:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 at 12:47:54 -0600, Sam wrote:
How does one go about getting the text for JS.Scramble to put into the
user.db file? Is there a location for strings that have been pulled out?
If you mean JS.Spam.Scramble.A, please find
Bart Silverstrim wrote:
Personally, my gripe is that the product is called ClamAV. If it's
expanding it's mission to protect people from everything called
malware, I'd change the name to something that indicates it's a
malware detector and not a virus detector. Phishing scams are *not*
Nigel Horne wrote:
On Tuesday 22 Mar 2005 14:27, Rob MacGregor wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 19:33:03 +0530, Nabin Limbu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
What are the benefits of using 3rd party software like Mailscanner, Mimedefang
and
many others with clamav? Why do people use when it can be done
* Nigel Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20050322 17:37]: wrote:
On Tuesday 22 Mar 2005 14:27, Rob MacGregor wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 19:33:03 +0530, Nabin Limbu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
What are the benefits of using 3rd party software like Mailscanner,
Mimedefang and
many
Victor a écrit :
Hello,
Please, someone can explain to me, what is milter ?
Kind of Mail fILTER for sendmail.
Regards.
--
Guillaume Arcas
J'ai personnellement connu un canard qui avait du genie.
Alphonse Allais
On Mar 22, 2005, at 8:05 AM, Dennis Davis wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
From: Bart Silverstrim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ClamAV users ML clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 07:40:18 -0500
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Report Phishing attacks?
...
I believe this is
On Mar 22, 2005, at 9:43 AM, BitFuzzy wrote:
Bart Silverstrim wrote:
Personally, my gripe is that the product is called ClamAV. If it's
expanding it's mission to protect people from everything called
malware, I'd change the name to something that indicates it's a
malware detector and not a
-Original Message-
Dave Goodrich wrote:
We use MailScanner because it offers additional tools, delivery options,
routing, and filtering above clamav. We also do not have issues with the
clam daemon that some have had. Julian is exceedingly responsive to his
community, the level of
You can forego mailscanner in this setup.
I use: sendmail+clamd+clamav-milter+spamassassin. This seems to work pretty
well.
--
JAV
-- Original Message ---
From: Nabin Limbu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
Sent: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 16:51:40 +0530
Subject:
On Tuesday 22 Mar 2005 14:51, Dave Goodrich wrote:
Nigel Horne wrote:
On Tuesday 22 Mar 2005 14:27, Rob MacGregor wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 19:33:03 +0530, Nabin Limbu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
What are the benefits of using 3rd party software like Mailscanner,
Mimedefang and
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 at 8:33:09 -0600, Sam wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, Tomasz Papszun wrote:
If you mean JS.Spam.Scramble.A, please find it attached.
Disclaimer: use it at your own risk.
Thanks Tomas!
(I'm a little worried now though with your disclaimer... :) Was it just
Julian Mehnle wrote:
I can't believe you still didn't get the point.
This is NOT about removing ClamAV's capacity for detecting phishing
attacks, little yellow rubber ducks in PNG images, or whatever else. This
is about making it _optional_, for those people who don't want certain
types of
Julian Mehnle wrote:
I can't believe you still didn't get the point.
This is NOT about removing ClamAV's capacity for detecting phishing
attacks, little yellow rubber ducks in PNG images, or whatever else.
This
is about making it _optional_, for those people who don't want certain
types of
Hi all,
I am new with linux, but i could install it in the PC (Red hat 9). Now
i have a problem with clamav0.83. In the doc you can see the following:
To test your installation execute:
$ ~/clamav/bin/freshclam
$ ~/clamav/bin/clamscan
When the installation finished i tried to do from my home
Nigel Horne wrote:
On Tuesday 22 Mar 2005 14:51, Dave Goodrich wrote:
Nigel Horne wrote:
On Tuesday 22 Mar 2005 14:27, Rob MacGregor wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 19:33:03 +0530, Nabin Limbu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
What are the benefits of using 3rd party software like Mailscanner, Mimedefang
Michel Machado a écrit :
Hi all,
I am new with linux, but i could install it in the PC (Red hat 9). Now
i have a problem with clamav0.83. In the doc you can see the following:
To test your installation execute:
$ ~/clamav/bin/freshclam
$ ~/clamav/bin/clamscan
When the installation
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 04:39:14PM +0100, Michel Machado wrote:
Hi all,
I am new with linux, but i could install it in the PC (Red hat 9). Now
i have a problem with clamav0.83. In the doc you can see the following:
did you install it from source, or an rpm?
To test your installation
Cormack, Ken wrote:
-Original Message-
Dave Goodrich wrote:
We use MailScanner because it offers additional tools, delivery options,
routing, and filtering above clamav. We also do not have issues with the
clam daemon that some have had. Julian is exceedingly responsive to his
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am new in clamAV, I installed the clamAV-0.83 under Redhat AS3. After
installed the clamAV, I tried to run the clamd but failed. The system prompted
below ERROR:
ERROR: Please edit the example config file /usr/local/etc/clamd.conf.
ERROR: Can't open/parse the config
Alexander Lelyakin wrote:
Alexander Lelyakin wrote:
I have just encountered a problem:
clamscan --unrar
works good only if archive has extension .rar
Following command:
$ cat clam-error.rar | clamscan --unrar -
try:
$cat clam-error.rar | xargs clamscan --unrar
also does not catch viruses
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 19:33:03 +0530, Nabin Limbu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
What are the benefits of using 3rd party software like
Mailscanner, Mimedefang and
many others with clamav? Why do people use when it can be done
simply with
clamav-milter and spamassassin.
Mailscanner is sort of
Victor wrote:
Hello,
Please, someone can explain to me, what is milter ?
Thanks.
It is a programming interface for the SendMail smtp server. It allows developers
to extend the functionality of SendMail by creating various message processing
tools such as anti-spam filters, address validation,
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 12:10:09AM +0800, Kelvin wrote:
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am new in clamAV, I installed the clamAV-0.83 under Redhat AS3. After
installed the clamAV, I tried to run the clamd but failed. The system
prompted below ERROR:
ERROR: Please edit the example config file
Kelvin wrote:
ERROR: Please edit the example config file /usr/local/etc/clamd.conf.
ERROR: Can't open/parse the config file /usr/local/etc/clamd.conf
I read the conf file and many setting inside but I didn't know which one
was the most important option I had to define. What is
At 06:43 AM 3/22/2005, BitFuzzy wrote:
Bart Silverstrim wrote:
Personally, my gripe is that the product is called ClamAV. If it's
expanding it's mission to protect people from everything called
malware, I'd change the name to something that indicates it's a malware
detector and not a virus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
your argument isn't consistent.
Paul Theodoropoulos
Here we go again.
dp
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Pierluigi Di Lorenzo wrote:
Following command:
$ cat clam-error.rar | clamscan --unrar -
try:
$cat clam-error.rar | xargs clamscan --unrar
And have You tried it yourself?
Probably You mean:
echo clam-error.rar | xargs clamscan --unrar
But the problem is that clamscan cannot check rar archives from
At 10:08 AM 3/22/2005, you wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
your argument isn't consistent.
Paul Theodoropoulos
Here we go again.
Perhaps this is why it keeps coming up. An action based upon a flawed or
inconsistent stance tends to do that. Why aren't we blocking Nigeria Scams?
people have
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
um, reread what you just wrote. 'any item regardless of it's delivery
method that has the potential to do harm financially or otherwise'.
let's see, little old ladies emailing their bank account information
to MRS. MIRIAM SESE SEKO, LATE OF THE CHIEF PETROLEUM RESERVES
John Hinton wrote:
In the last couple of weeks, I'm getting reports from users that
Norton is reporting W32.Netsky.P making it through from my servers.
I'm configured right, have the latest db updates. I'm wondering if
this is another of Norton's reporting of 'broken' viruses? I searched
the
BitFuzzy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The difference between what's being detected as phishing attempts is
that they are crafted to make you believe you are at
http://www.your-bank.com, ebay.com, paypal.com, etc. They are in most
cases very convincing, thus not only the foolish can fall
On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 18:31, John Hinton wrote:
John Hinton wrote:
In the last couple of weeks, I'm getting reports from users that
Norton is reporting W32.Netsky.P making it through from my servers.
I'm configured right, have the latest db updates. I'm wondering if
this is another
John Hinton wrote:
John Hinton wrote:
In the last couple of weeks, I'm getting reports from users that
Norton is reporting W32.Netsky.P making it through from my servers.
I'm configured right, have the latest db updates. I'm wondering if
this is another of Norton's reporting of 'broken'
BitFuzzy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The difference between what's being detected as phishing attempts is
that they are crafted to make you believe you are at
http://www.your-bank.com, ebay.com, paypal.com, etc. They are in most
cases very convincing, thus not only the foolish can fall prey. (I
Daniel J McDonald wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 04:39:14PM +0100, Michel Machado wrote:
Hi all,
I am new with linux, but i could install it in the PC (Red hat 9). Now
i have a problem with clamav0.83. In the doc you can see the following:
did you install it from source, or an rpm?
Julian Mehnle wrote:
The way to combat phishing is to employ sender authentication methods
such as SPF, DomainKeys, and public-key message cryptography.
This is unfortunately debatable. SPF, DomainKeys, cryptography, SenderID, etc.
can only work on info in the message.
Nothing stops people
Matthew van Eerde wrote:
Julian Mehnle wrote:
The way to combat phishing is to employ sender authentication methods
such as SPF, DomainKeys, and public-key message cryptography.
This is unfortunately debatable. SPF, DomainKeys, cryptography,
SenderID, etc. can only work on info in the
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 08:49:40PM +0100, Julian Mehnle wrote:
Matthew van Eerde wrote:
Julian Mehnle wrote:
The way to combat phishing is to employ sender authentication methods
such as SPF, DomainKeys, and public-key message cryptography.
This is unfortunately debatable. SPF,
René Bellora wrote:
John Hinton wrote:
John Hinton wrote:
In the last couple of weeks, I'm getting reports from users that
Norton is reporting W32.Netsky.P making it through from my servers.
I'm configured right, have the latest db updates. I'm wondering if
this is another of Norton's reporting
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 19:55:38 +0100 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Julian Mehnle
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The way to combat phishing is to employ sender authentication methods
such as SPF, DomainKeys, and public-key message cryptography.
SPF is not a good way to do this, it does practically nothing to
Is anyone having trouble detecting Test #14 (the TNEF test) from
http://www.webmail.us/testvirus ?
I know there's been a lot of discussion about eicar detection with regards
to Clam recently, and, to complicate the issue, I can't seem to unpack the
winmail.dat file, so it could be that things
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 16:26:35 -0500 (EST)
jef moskot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is anyone having trouble detecting Test #14 (the TNEF test) from
http://www.webmail.us/testvirus ?
I know there's been a lot of discussion about eicar detection with
regards to Clam recently, and, to complicate the
Robin Lynn Frank wrote:
I know it is an unusual question, but has anyone here used mod.clamav
with apache 2 and clamav? Good? Bad? Ugly?
IMHO this works quite well. We use that combination as virus scanning
http/ftp proxy on several machines. We use Debian packages, only
mod_clamav had to be
On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 21:43:49 -0800 (PST)
Joanna Roman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Let me know what you think.
I downloaded clamav (0.92) and installed it. When I
clamscan clamav-0.82.tar.gz, clamscan says the archive
is OK. However, when I clamscan clamav-0.82/test,
clamscan says
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
ClamAV doesn't support the TNEF format.
Hmm, good point. I also forgot to mention I'm using ClamAV 0.83, but I
guess that's irrelevant.
I use amavis to pass the files off to ClamAV and I haven't changed
anything (purposely) with it, but prior to this
Daniel J McDonald wrote:
Julian Mehnle wrote:
Matthew van Eerde wrote:
Nothing stops people from registering a domain like
onlinebanking.example and then sending out - perfectly legitimately
- from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Still the sender is not @citibank.com.
But I could form a
On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 21:26, jef moskot wrote:
Is anyone having trouble detecting Test #14 (the TNEF test) from
http://www.webmail.us/testvirus ?
TNEF is on my list of things to do. To be honest it had slipped my
memory, and I have spare time at the moment so I'll have a look.
Jeffrey Moskot
Nigel Horne wrote:
On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 21:26, jef moskot wrote:
Is anyone having trouble detecting Test #14 (the TNEF test) from
http://www.webmail.us/testvirus ?
TNEF is on my list of things to do. To be honest it had slipped my
memory, and I have spare time at the moment so I'll have a look.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 05:36:04PM -0500, Jim Maul wrote:
Nigel Horne wrote:
On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 21:26, jef moskot wrote:
Is anyone having trouble detecting Test #14 (the TNEF test) from
http://www.webmail.us/testvirus ?
TNEF is on my list of things to do. To be honest it had slipped
Dear Sir/Madam,
I got the following message from clamd.log
Can't unlink the pid file /var/run/clamd.pid but the file can be updated
What does it mean? I checked the permission is clamav
Best regards,
Kelvin
___
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kelvin
Sent: woensdag 23 maart 2005 2:58
To: clamav-users
Subject: [Clamav-users] Can't unlink the pid file /var/run/clamd.pid
Dear Sir/Madam,
I got the following message from clamd.log
77 matches
Mail list logo
