Re: [Clamav-users] [OT] pgp is annoying, was: [OT] Top posting is harmful.

2005-12-19 Thread Brian Morrison
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 08:53:04 +0100 in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Leif Neland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Talking about annoyances; I hate messages signed by pgp because my reader shows the messages as blank with two attachments: the text and the key. H, Outlook Express, I wonder why that could be?

Re: [Clamav-users] [OT] Top posting is harmful. (Was: Clamd Problem.)

2005-12-19 Thread Brian Morrison
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 08:04:24 +0200 in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cami [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What upsets me, is when, on mailing lists everywhere, a few people turn 'top post' instances into flame wars. Is it really that hard to ignore it? Do people really need to be flamed for something so

Re: [Clamav-users] [OT] Top posting is harmful. (Was: Clamd Problem.)

2005-12-19 Thread Vaijanath N. Rao
Brian Morrison wrote: On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 08:04:24 +0200 in 43A6 Hi guys, why just u let the topic go. It's enough discussion on this. Any post on this topic (including this) should not be allowed any more and rejected straight away. Regards Vaijanath N. Rao Life is as always as it was

Re: [Clamav-users] Virus not detected by clamav

2005-12-19 Thread Dennis Peterson
Hamilton Vera said: Hi list, Since November, I noticed that clamav 87.1 does not recognize the following virus. www.i2.com.br/~hamilton/reg_pass.zip So I posted it in http://cgi.clamav.net/sendvirus.cgi, but I got no answer NOD32 detects it as Win32/Sober.Y worm, I'd like to know

Re: [Clamav-users] Virus not detected by clamav

2005-12-19 Thread Andy Fiddaman
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005, Hamilton Vera wrote: ; Since November, I noticed that clamav 87.1 does not recognize the following ; virus. ; ; www.i2.com.br/~hamilton/reg_pass.zip ; ; So I posted it in http://cgi.clamav.net/sendvirus.cgi, but I got no answer ; ; NOD32 detects it as Win32/Sober.Y

Re: [Clamav-users] Virus not detected by clamav

2005-12-19 Thread Hamilton Vera
Hi Denis, thanks for answering. What version are you using? I am using and updated 87.1, and I think that this version is not working. clamd -V ClamAV 0.87.1 Received signal: wake up ClamAV update process started at Mon Dec 19 13:51:22 2005 main.cvd is up to date (version: 34, sigs: 39625,

Re: [Clamav-users] [OT] Top posting is harmful. (Was: Clamd Problem.)

2005-12-19 Thread aCaB
Hi kids. Is the spam going to last long? Please keep your OT confined to your own blogs/MLs. Stop abusing everyone's patience. -aCaB ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Re: [Clamav-users] Virus not detected by clamav

2005-12-19 Thread christian laubscher
What version are you using? I am using and updated 87.1, and I think that this version is not working. my clamscan (87.1/1213) definitely finds it here (Worm.Sober.U). -- ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Re: [Clamav-users] Virus not detected by clamav

2005-12-19 Thread Dennis Peterson
Hamilton Vera said: Hi Denis, thanks for answering. What version are you using? I am using and updated 87.1, and I think that this version is not working. I'm running v 87.1. Examine your clamd.conf and freshclam.conf files and ensure they agree on where the cvd files are being placed. It

Re: [Clamav-users] Virus not detected by clamav

2005-12-19 Thread Nigel Horne
Hamilton Vera wrote: Hi list, Since November, I noticed that clamav 87.1 does not recognize the following virus. www.i2.com.br/~hamilton/reg_pass.zip Try the development version: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ clamscan reg_pass.zip reg_pass.zip: Worm.Sober.U FOUND --- SCAN SUMMARY

Re: [Clamav-users] Virus not detected by clamav

2005-12-19 Thread Brian Morrison
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 13:34:00 -0200 (BRDT) in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hamilton Vera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: NOD32 detects it as Win32/Sober.Y worm, I'd like to know if it is an isolated case. Don't assume that NOD32 has identified it correctly, other packages have false positives you know. --

Re: [Clamav-users] Virus not detected by clamav

2005-12-19 Thread Dennis Peterson
Nigel Horne said: Hamilton Vera wrote: Hi list, Since November, I noticed that clamav 87.1 does not recognize the following virus. www.i2.com.br/~hamilton/reg_pass.zip Try the development version: It would be very nice if future releases of clamd and freshclam printed out the

Re: [Clamav-users] Virus not detected by clamav

2005-12-19 Thread Nigel Horne
Brian Morrison wrote: On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 16:28:47 + in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Nigel Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: www.i2.com.br/~hamilton/reg_pass.zip Try the development version: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ clamscan reg_pass.zip reg_pass.zip: Worm.Sober.U FOUND So does that

Re: [Clamav-users] Virus not detected by clamav

2005-12-19 Thread James Courtier-Dutton
Brian Morrison wrote: On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 16:28:47 + in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Nigel Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: www.i2.com.br/~hamilton/reg_pass.zip Try the development version: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ clamscan reg_pass.zip reg_pass.zip: Worm.Sober.U FOUND So does that mean a new

Re: [Clamav-users] Virus not detected by clamav

2005-12-19 Thread James Courtier-Dutton
Hamilton Vera wrote: Hi list, Since November, I noticed that clamav 87.1 does not recognize the following virus. www.i2.com.br/~hamilton/reg_pass.zip So I posted it in http://cgi.clamav.net/sendvirus.cgi, but I got no answer NOD32 detects it as Win32/Sober.Y worm, I'd like to know if

[Clamav-users] Re: Clamav conflict w/ Vuescan?

2005-12-19 Thread René Berber
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Katie Bretsch wrote: Greetings Clamavonians, I am having trouble getting Vuescan, running on my Mac OS 10.3.9, to recognize my scanner, and am checking to see if there are any known conflicts with ClamAV sentry that might help solve this. Also

[Clamav-users] Clamav conflict w/ Vuescan?

2005-12-19 Thread Bretsch Katie
On Dec 19, 2005, at 11:41 AM, René Berber wrote: Greetings Clamavonians, I am having trouble getting Vuescan, running on my Mac OS 10.3.9, to recognize my scanner, and am checking to see if there are any known conflicts with ClamAV sentry that might help solve this. Also can't figure out

Re: [Clamav-users] [OT] Top posting is harmful. (Was: Clamd Problem.)

2005-12-19 Thread Steffen Kluge
On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 08:45 -0500, Adam L wrote: Well, the funny thing is, top posting ultimately helps my signal to noise ratio. I can immediately see if the new content of the mail is relevant. You'd see that with bottom-posted replies, too, if all bottom posters *also* trimmed the quote

Re: [Clamav-users] [OT] Top posting is harmful. (Was: Clamd Problem.)

2005-12-19 Thread Dennis Peterson
--===1749794583== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary==-T+x+rx4EgXmhQ3m8Pm5w --=-T+x+rx4EgXmhQ3m8Pm5w Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 08:45

Re: [Clamav-users] [OT] Top posting is harmful. (Was: Clamd Problem.)

2005-12-19 Thread Chuck Swiger
Dennis Peterson wrote: [ ...raw MIME message from Steffen Kluge [EMAIL PROTECTED] deleted... ] So that you would see what I see when you post I left in all your mime content. This too is inappropriate in a mail list. If you'd like to trim something, how about turning this mess off? This is a

Re: [Clamav-users] getting nag screen about old installation even after installing 0.87.1

2005-12-19 Thread Dennis Peterson
C. Andrews Lavarre said: In short, I nuked 0.85.x, got rid of all the files I could find. I then installed 0.87.1, checked versions, run both clamscan and freshclam just fine manually without any rootmail or messages complaints, but when invoked from a shell script that does nothing more

Re: [Clamav-users] [OT] Top posting is harmful. (Was: Clamd Problem.)

2005-12-19 Thread Bretsch Katie
The only ones that vex me are the ones that quote a whole danged digest. Ahhhh! On Dec 19, 2005, at 4:56 PM, Dennis Peterson wrote: So that you would see what I see when you post I left in all your mime content. This too is inappropriate in a mail list. If you'd like to trim

Re: [Clamav-users] [OT] Top posting is harmful. (Was: Clamd Problem.)

2005-12-19 Thread Dennis Peterson
Chuck Swiger said: PS: Delurking to put in my $0.02, but I plan to dodge the rest of this thread unless something novel appears. (Focus! Stay on target... :-) Time spent pulling weeds is good for the blooms and makes for a healthy garden. You can't spend all your time smelling the roses or

Re: [Clamav-users] Virus not detected by clamav

2005-12-19 Thread Rob Chanter
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 08:39:10AM -0800, Dennis Peterson wrote: In fact it would be nice to have a command line switch that generates a listing of what is seen and understood by the applications after reading the clamd.conf and freshclam.conf files, as well as where they were found. delurk

Re: [Clamav-users] [OT] Top posting is harmful. (Was: Clamd Problem.)

2005-12-19 Thread Dennis Peterson
Bretsch Katie said: The only ones that vex me are the ones that quote a whole danged digest. Ahhhh! Not something you need fear from me - I'm pretty decent about pruning unless I'm making a point about pruning hypocrisy. But you seem to be ok with top posters (and top posting)

Re: [Clamav-users] Virus not detected by clamav

2005-12-19 Thread Dennis Peterson
Rob Chanter said: On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 08:39:10AM -0800, Dennis Peterson wrote: In fact it would be nice to have a command line switch that generates a listing of what is seen and understood by the applications after reading the clamd.conf and freshclam.conf files, as well as where they

[Clamav-users] Re: getting nag screen about old installation even after installing 0.87.1

2005-12-19 Thread C. Andrews Lavarre
Dennis Peterson wrote: It might be that you still have an earlier version of clamscan on your system and this can be found by running which clamscan if you're using Linux or Unix. Thanks to all and you, Dennis in particular. Here are the results in Fedora Core kernel 2.6.12-1.1376_FC3 :

Re: [Clamav-users] [OT] Top posting is harmful. (Was: Clamd Problem.)

2005-12-19 Thread Steffen Kluge
On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 16:56 -0800, Dennis Peterson wrote: [undecoded PGP/MIME message snipped] So that you would see what I see when you post I left in all your mime content. So ELM does actually present a bit stream as sequence of printable characters? How modern! This too is inappropriate

Re: [Clamav-users] [OT] Top posting is harmful. (Was: Clamd Problem.)

2005-12-19 Thread Dennis Peterson
Steffen Kluge said: On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 16:56 -0800, Dennis Peterson wrote: [undecoded PGP/MIME message snipped] So that you would see what I see when you post I left in all your mime content. So ELM does actually present a bit stream as sequence of printable characters? How modern! It's

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: getting nag screen about old installation even after installing 0.87.1

2005-12-19 Thread Fajar A. Nugraha
C. Andrews Lavarre wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# which clamscan /usr/local/bin/clamscan [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# cd /usr/local/bin/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] bin]# clamscan -V ClamAV 0.87.1/1211/Fri Dec 16 17:51:35 2005 Try ./clamscan -V or /usr/local/bin/clamscan -V. Otherwise, cd /usr/local/bin/ is