[Clamav-users] Clamav and qmail-scanner problem?

Does this look right? I have been watching the full header information lately to see if mails are being scanned with purpose. Im noticing that (or what seems like) Clamav is using an older database. Here is a snippet of the header of one message.. [EMAIL PROTECTED], uid 508) with

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav and qmail-scanner problem?

Sam DeForest wrote: Does this look right? I have been watching the full header information lately to see if mails are being scanned with purpose. Im noticing that (or what seems like) Clamav is using an older database. Here is a snippet of the header of one message.. [EMAIL PROTECTED],

RE: [Clamav-users] Clamav and qmail-scanner problem?

Sam DeForest wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED], uid 508) with qmail-scanner-1.25-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.88/1235. spamassassin: 3.0.0. perlscan: 1.25-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(220.175.180.80):SA:0(-1.2/5.0): ... So, in my estimation, it looks to be that clamdscan is not using the latest database release

[Clamav-users] Re: Clamav and qmail-scanner problem?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sam DeForest wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED], uid 508) with qmail-scanner-1.25-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.88/1235. spamassassin: 3.0.0. perlscan: 1.25-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(220.175.180.80):SA:0(-1.2/5.0): ... So, in my estimation, it looks to be that clamdscan is not using the

RE: [Clamav-users] Re: Clamav and qmail-scanner problem?

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:clamav-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jesse Guardiani Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 12:43 PM To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net Subject: [Clamav-users] Re: Clamav and qmail-scanner problem? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sam