Re: [Clamav-users] Terrible performance with 0.90.2

2007-04-24 Thread Michael Heiming
René Berber wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Michael Heiming wrote: | Tests show pretty bad performance with 0.90.2 and clamscan. Running | Mailscanner it seems not trivial to switch to clamd, It is trivial, just change lib/clamav-wrapper and

Re: [Clamav-users] Terrible performance with 0.90.2

2007-04-24 Thread Michael Heiming
Michael Heiming wrote: René Berber wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Michael Heiming wrote: | Tests show pretty bad performance with 0.90.2 and clamscan. Running | Mailscanner it seems not trivial to switch to clamd, It is trivial, just change lib/clamav-wrapper and

Re: [Clamav-users] Terrible performance with 0.90.2

2007-04-24 Thread Randal, Phil
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Michael Heiming wrote: René Berber wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Michael Heiming wrote: Tests show pretty bad performance with 0.90.2 and clamscan. Running Mailscanner it seems not trivial to switch to clamd, It is trivial, just

Re: [Clamav-users] Terrible performance with 0.90.2

2007-04-24 Thread Michael Heiming
Randal, Phil wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Michael Heiming wrote: René Berber wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Michael Heiming wrote: Tests show pretty bad performance with 0.90.2 and clamscan. Running Mailscanner it seems not trivial to switch to clamd, It is

Re: [Clamav-users] Terrible performance with 0.90.2

2007-04-24 Thread Michael Heiming
Michael Heiming wrote: Michael Heiming wrote: René Berber wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Michael Heiming wrote: | Tests show pretty bad performance with 0.90.2 and clamscan. Running | Mailscanner it seems not trivial to switch to clamd, It is trivial, just change

Re: [Clamav-users] MSRBL-Images file shrinks

2007-04-24 Thread Chris Burton
Thanks Bill, looks like its growing again though, probably be +12mb again soon. The changes just took longer to do than I had hoped. As you can see now the MSRBL-Images.hdb file is down to around 600KiB and 10K entries. If you want anymore info on the changes they are listed on our announce

[Clamav-users] (no subject)

2007-04-24 Thread Charles Whipple
In attempting to compile ClamAV 0.90.2 I receive the below errors on my Solaris 8 280R. Configure seems happy, but make fails as you'll see from my screenshots below. My GNU Toolchain is as follows. bash-2.03# pkginfo -l SMCgcc PKGINST: SMCgcc NAME: gcc CATEGORY: application

[Clamav-users] AV server

2007-04-24 Thread Christopher S Arnold
I am following the faq on serving the cvd files from a local server so that each client doesn’t have to download them from the clamav servers? I have edited /etc/clamd.conf to say DatabaseDirectory /srv/www/htdocs/folder and also edited the freshclam.conf file to say the same thing. When i try

Re: [Clamav-users] AV server

2007-04-24 Thread Daniel J McDonald
On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 16:40 -0400, Christopher S Arnold wrote: I am following the faq on serving the cvd files from a local server so that each client doesn’t have to download them from the clamav servers? I have edited /etc/clamd.conf to say DatabaseDirectory /srv/www/htdocs/folder and

[Clamav-users] Clamscan delays

2007-04-24 Thread Urban Hillebrand
We noticed as well the long delay with clamscan (several people have reported this here). We are perfectly ok with using clamd + clamdscan - however, on our mailgateways clamscan is still there as fallback if clamd is not responding (due to a crash or a misconfiguration). With the newly

Re: [Clamav-users] Terrible performance with 0.90.2

2007-04-24 Thread René Berber
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Michael Heiming wrote: | clamav-wrapper is the same file from the latest MS, the SweepViruses.pm | patched applied cleanly after editing out some garbled text. So I gues | it is just the same with the clamav-wrapper patch, though I can't find |

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamscan delays

2007-04-24 Thread Dave Warren
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Urban Hillebrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We noticed as well the long delay with clamscan (several people have reported this here). We are perfectly ok with using clamd + clamdscan - however, on our mailgateways clamscan is still there as fallback if clamd is not

[Clamav-users] [Possible SPAM] Re: MSRBL-Images file shrinks

2007-04-24 Thread Chris
On Tuesday 24 April 2007 9:49 am, Chris Burton wrote: Thanks Bill, looks like its growing again though, probably be +12mb again soon. The changes just took longer to do than I had hoped. As you can see now the MSRBL-Images.hdb file is down to around 600KiB and 10K entries. If you want

Re: [Clamav-users] AV server

2007-04-24 Thread Christopher S Arnold
That did the job! Thank you for the help! -Original Message- From: Daniel J McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ClamAV users ML clamav-users@lists.clamav.net Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:07:58 -0500 Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] AV server On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 16:40 -0400, Christopher S Arnold