Thanks, Matthias
Usually, via the ports system, I see a lot of FreeBSD specific patches
under ./files -- are you sure I can ignore those? I will give it a try,
though.
- Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthias Häker
Sent: dinsdag
Török Edwin wrote:
You don't need to upgrade to 4.1.2/4.2.x.
gcc-3.4 can be nicely installed side-by-side with a 4.0.x/4.1.0 series
gcc, all you need to do is:
# apt-get install gcc-3.4
$ export CC=gcc-3.4
$ ./configure
All our systems are frozen - no changes until mid-Jan. clamav is
Per Jessen wrote:
All our systems are frozen - no changes until mid-Jan. clamav is one of
very few exceptions.
Try:
$ CFLAGS=-O0 ./configure
If that works you can try:
$ CFLAGS=-O1 ./configure
--Edwin
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV
On December 18, 2007 at 05:57AM Mark wrote:
[ snip ]
Usually, via the ports system, I see a lot of FreeBSD specific patches
under ./files -- are you sure I can ignore those? I will give it a try,
though.
Please don't top post. It makes following a thread far more difficult than
need be.
I
At 09:36 PM Monday, 12/17/2007, Mark wrote -=
-Original Message-
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Kasky
Sent: dinsdag 18 december 2007 6:28
Starting clamav-milter: clamav-milter: error while loading
shared libraries: libclamav.so.3: cannot open shared object
file: No such
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 03:38:12PM +0100, Oliver Schwarz said:
is it safe to build it with CFLAGS=-O0 and to let it run on
production servers?
i have to mention, that i'm no expert in using compiler options.
-O0 is safe, but as mentioned elsewhere, I'd just upgrade your compiler.
--
I just upgraded my servers after a little testing: 0.92 seems to be about 20%
faster than 0.91.2 and about 15% faster than 0.92rc2.
The initial memory usage seems to be a little improved also (from 36m to 35m).
Remains, however, the problem of icreased memory usage after DB reload:
This is my
Fabio Pedretti wrote:
I just upgraded my servers after a little testing: 0.92 seems to be about 20%
faster than 0.91.2 and about 15% faster than 0.92rc2.
The initial memory usage seems to be a little improved also (from 36m to 35m).
Remains, however, the problem of icreased memory usage
Steven Stern wrote:
Fabio Pedretti wrote:
I just upgraded my servers after a little testing: 0.92 seems to be about
20% faster than 0.91.2 and about 15% faster than 0.92rc2.
The initial memory usage seems to be a little improved also (from 36m to
35m).
Remains, however, the problem of
Hi there -
I completed an upgrade of ClamAV to version 0.92 by following the appropriate
procedure on the website.
When I tried to start either clamd or freshclam, the error message shown below
appears:
error while loading shared libraries: libclamav.so.3: cannot open shared object
file:
Hi there --
Thanks for your e-mail. I ran the ldconfig utility, and afterwards was able
to successfully run freshclam and clamd. Thanks for the help.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven Stern
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 1:51 PM
Hi, on Fedora core 3 I have a problem with rpm construction for to use
clamav-0.92, when I execute:
#rpmbuild --target i386 -ba SPECS/clamav.spec
I have this error:
Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1
Checking for unpackaged file(s):
you have to check your spec-file which is used to build your clam 0.92
this file seems to be new to your spec and is installed into your libdir
add it to %files-section
André
- Original Message -
From: Sasa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ClamAV users ML clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
Sent:
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:10:28 +0100
Sasa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, on Fedora core 3 I have a problem with rpm construction for to use
clamav-0.92, when I execute:
#rpmbuild --target i386 -ba SPECS/clamav.spec
I have this error:
Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1
Hi, my spec file is this:
Name: clamav
Version: 0.92
Release: 1
Epoch: 102
License: GPL
Group: System Environment/Daemons
Source0: http://download.sf.net/clamav/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
Source1: clamd.sh
Source2: clamav-milter.sh
Source3: freshclam.sh
Source4: clamav-milter.sysconfig
Source5:
Steven Stern wrote:
Fabio Pedretti wrote:
I just upgraded my servers after a little testing: 0.92 seems to be about
20% faster than 0.91.2 and about 15% faster than 0.92rc2.
The initial memory usage seems to be a little improved also (from 36m to
35m).
Remains, however, the problem of
Steven Stern wrote:
After 3 1/2 hours
2332 clamav20 0 216m 83m 1636 S0 4.1 0:21.52 clamd
It does seem to be growing
That's probably perfectly normal. Clamd uses pthreads. When it needs
to allocate space for a new thread's stack, it allocates memory.
When the thread exits,
Hi,
I just configure with CFLAGS=-O0 and did make
and make install and it worked on my Mac running
10.4.11!
However we in the Apple user community are at the
mercy of Apple as to when Apple will update gcc
to 4.1.1 or later. I had pre-release version of
gcc-4.2.1 from Apple which didn't work
Hmm, I get this error when I put ScanRAR back in:
clamav ERROR: Parse error at line 19: Unknown option ScanRAR
I thought the ChangeLog said:
Wed Dec 12 21:59:00 CET 2007 (tk)
-
* libclamunrar, libclamunrar_iface: re-include RAR code
It DOES seem
I am using clamav-milter with sendmail.
The only thing that annoyes me is, I am drowning in virus intercepted
messages.
They are sent to postmaster as well as to the recipient adresses.
I want to stop both. but nothing foung in the docu now.
tia
Markus Gonaus
20 matches
Mail list logo
