On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 04:11:08PM -0500, Nathan Brink wrote:
>
> I don't like it when other programs do this because it departs from the
> normal output of ./configure scripts.
What exactly are you doing with the output that it bothers you and where is
this "standard" defined?
__
Hi Everyone,
This is a reminder of this week's ClamAV Webcast tomorrow
at 1800UTC (1300EST).
The talk, given by Alain Zidouemba of Sourcefire, will be an
introduction to writing ClamAV Signatures. It will take about an
hour. The talk will be technically advanced, and is aimed toward system
admini
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Török Edwin wrote:
>> The problem is that the output from ./configure is lost after you
>> install ClamAV.
>
> That is absurd.
>
> ./configure |tee config.rpt
>
>> On 2009-03-02 01:41, Dennis Peterson wrote:
>>> but the objective of summaries is to
>>> provide self-hel
Török Edwin wrote:
> On 2009-02-28 22:25, Dennis Peterson wrote:
>> This is important because I have a clamd farm and now with the 0.95rc1
>> release I
>> have a mismatch. And since communications has changed I have to build a
>> one-to-one relationship with the client and the daemon and I'm not
Matt Watchinski wrote:
> Not really sure what your implying,
>
> I offered up moving all the 3rd party signatures to the clamav
> submission interface, so they could be signed and distributed through
> all the entire freshclam mirror architecture. The offer still stands,
> but I haven't gotten an
Not really sure what your implying,
I offered up moving all the 3rd party signatures to the clamav
submission interface, so they could be signed and distributed through
all the entire freshclam mirror architecture. The offer still stands,
but I haven't gotten any takers yet.
The UNOFFICIAL tag j
Török Edwin wrote:
> On 2009-03-01 23:32, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote:
>> Some examples about clamav :
>>
>> * Solaris don't have ncurses library - so, clamdtop won't be built. This
>> isn't critical. But it's interesting to know that clamdtop won't be
>> built and the library wasn't found.
Steve Basford wrote:
> The Sanesecurity signatures are double-checked before uploading with
> clamscan... they are also gpg signed and have a sha256 checksum file also
> available... so their integrity should be ok at both ends. As you say,
> the databases load ok... the problem seems when the d
> -Original Message-
> From: clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net [mailto:clamav-users-
> boun...@lists.clamav.net] On Behalf Of Nathan Brink
> Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2009 4:11 PM
> To: ClamAV users ML
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Two suggestions
>
> > * When running configure, it could
On 2009-03-01 23:32, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote:
> Some examples about clamav :
>
> * Solaris don't have ncurses library - so, clamdtop won't be built. This
> isn't critical. But it's interesting to know that clamdtop won't be
> built and the library wasn't found. And configure shall not s
On 2009-02-28 22:25, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> This is important because I have a clamd farm and now with the 0.95rc1
> release I
> have a mismatch. And since communications has changed I have to build a
> one-to-one relationship with the client and the daemon and I'm not real happy
> with that
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 12:41 +, Steve Basford wrote:
> > Having used clamd for several years without it ever crashing, I am now
> > faced with it crashing quite often. This follows me setting up the new
> > sanesecurity system!
> Some users are seeing no problems, other are - which is the frus
> Having used clamd for several years without it ever crashing, I am now
> faced with it crashing quite often. This follows me setting up the new
> sanesecurity system!
>
> I used the old system, before that was stopped, without any problems (I am
> using 0.94.2).
Hi Phil,
Firstly, sorry for the
Having used clamd for several years without it ever crashing, I am now faced
with it crashing quite often. This follows me setting up the new sanesecurity
system!
I used the old system, before that was stopped, without any problems (I am
using 0.94.2).
I have written a simple perl script to m
On 2009-03-02 08:31, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> I've noticed after watching for some time on two solaris 9 Sparc systems that
> the mem and libc reports are always zero. Is this unexpected or is there a
> trigger event I've yet to experience? Running clamdscan against the test
> files
> does not
15 matches
Mail list logo
