I need to correct myself on this. The version of OpenSSL that Apple includes
in the current OS X is 0.9.8y 5 Feb 2013. I now see that the previously
reported version was add by me from MacPorts.
-Al-
On Feb 28, 2014, at 2:56 AM, Al Varnell alvarn...@mac.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at
Comment about this feature, which I've never turned on before.
I flipped it on, for a single mail router in a pool of 9. Over the
course of a day
and MANY messages, it tripped for only 4 messages, all of which seem legit.
So I'm turning it back off.
I'm working on a MapReduce project using Amazon's EC2. The only bottleneck
I have is that it takes ~35-40 seconds to scan each file, which seems very
high. I'm using a c program as a wrapper for ClamAV, which takes a single
file and the mode. Does anyone know approximately how long it takes to
On 3/2/14, 7:55 PM, Scott Snow wrote:
I'm working on a MapReduce project using Amazon's EC2. The only bottleneck
I have is that it takes ~35-40 seconds to scan each file, which seems very
high. I'm using a c program as a wrapper for ClamAV, which takes a single
file and the mode. Does anyone
I have noticed that the last update of the ClamAV database was at 01 Mar 2014
16-54 -0500, after that I didn't see any new updates. Are there issues with
releasing new updates?
A couple of months ago I have seen the same issue that no new updates were
released, and after a post on the
On Mar 2, 2014, at 11:19 PM, Mischa Coenen mc1...@live.nl wrote:
I have noticed that the last update of the ClamAV database was at 01 Mar 2014
16-54 -0500, after that I didn't see any new updates. Are there issues with
releasing new updates?
Weekends are always slow, so I wouldn’t get too
On Mar 2, 2014, at 11:19 PM, Mischa Coenen mc1...@live.nl wrote:
I have noticed that the last update of the ClamAV database was at 01 Mar 2014
16-54 -0500, after that I didn't see any new updates. Are there issues with
releasing new updates?
Weekends are always slow, so I wouldn’t get too
On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 12:00:00 -0500
clamav-users-requ...@lists.clamav.net wrote:
There are only a few of reasons I can imagine that SSL (OpenSSL)
would be a *required* addition to ClamAV:
1. A better way of signing signature downloads than whatever is
currently done (not sure what that is,
