My experience is that ClamAV is limited by to 4 GB for the size of a
file. Apparently it still uses 32-bit numbers (as opposed to addresses)
even on 64-bit machines.
On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 18:42:22 -0800
Al Varnell wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 03:48 PM, Micah Snyder (micasnyd) wrote:
> > 2. Do
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 03:48 PM, Micah Snyder (micasnyd) wrote:
> 2. Does it have the ability to scan large files (2 GBs+)?
> ClamAV currently has max file size limits around 2GB.
I believe the default MaxFileSize is only 25MB, at least that's what it is for
the clamd daemon. It can be re-config
> On Nov 20, 2017, at 6:48 PM, Micah Snyder (micasnyd)
> wrote:
>
> 3. Is it compatible with both Linux and Windows?
> Yes, however certain features (e.g. on access scanning) are limited to Linux.
I’ve found fswatch to overcome on-access scanning on OSX, and it supposed to
support more, but I
Hello,
1. Can it scan all files/data from a dirty S3 bucket, and place the files
into a clean bucket?
I don’t have experience working with S3 buckets. ClamAV works with files on a
filesystem. ClamAV’s ability to move files during scanning is limited to
moving dirty files, not moving clean file
I think some may be fixed already. I've opened ticket 11961 in the ClamAV
bugzilla for followup and tracking.
Steve
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 2:54 PM, Zetan Drableg
wrote:
> Hi,
> Anyone know when these CVEs will be fixed? Does clamav provide a 0.99.2
> security fix branch or I need to consume 0
Hi,
Anyone know when these CVEs will be fixed? Does clamav provide a 0.99.2
security fix branch or I need to consume 0.99.3 devel? Does EPEL backport
fixes?
CVE-2017-6418
CVE-2017-6419
CVE-2017-6420
It was discovered that ClamAV incorrectly handled parsing certain e-mail
messages. A remote attack
Hello,
I have a few questions about ClamAV.
1. Can it scan all files/data from a dirty S3 bucket, and place the files
into a clean bucket?
2. Does it have the ability to scan large files (2 GBs+)?
3. Is it compatible with both Linux and Windows?
4. Does it scale horizontally, adding more scanning
Interesting. All the allegedly affected emails I've checked have docx
attachments, not Adobe or .PDF. It seems incorrect that a signature for Adobe
and Reader would be triggering on docx files.
For now, I'm not going to put this in .ign2, but I will exclude the Maildir
scanning script from looking
Am 20.11.2017 um 16:01 schrieb Peter Geerts:
As far as I understand : files that are uploaded to a website/CMS system
are offered/delegated to clamav for checking.
Can you elaborate on the sanesecurity link because I have been at their
site but didn't find anything that could help me for this sp
As far as I understand : files that are uploaded to a website/CMS system
are offered/delegated to clamav for checking.
Can you elaborate on the sanesecurity link because I have been at their
site but didn't find anything that could help me for this specific
scenario.
Thanks
Peter
2017-11-20 15:5
Am 20.11.2017 um 15:48 schrieb Peter Geerts:
Perhaps this has been raised earlier but as a newbie I have a question
regarding Clamav capabilities in this area.
We currently already run a 99.2 version on Red Hat which does a lot of
virus checking already but malicious (script) code is not detec
Hi All,
Perhaps this has been raised earlier but as a newbie I have a question
regarding Clamav capabilities in this area.
We currently already run a 99.2 version on Red Hat which does a lot of
virus checking already but malicious (script) code is not detected.
If this is at all possible I w
12 matches
Mail list logo