[clamav-users] ClamAV Warning Everyday in my scan log bytecode 23

Hi everyone, it is a long time since in the log of the daily antivirus scan I find the following warning messages: START scan Wed Aug 8 05:00:01 CEST 2018 LibClamAV Warning: Bytecode run timed out in interpreter after 5000 opcodes LibClamAV Warning: Bytecode 23 failed to run: Time limit reached Li

[clamav-users] Bytecode 86 failed to run

Sorry, meant to send that to the list. Forwarded Message $ sha256sum .java/deployment/cache/6.0/6/41d72bc6-799a1944 97432da2d77d78872ececf4de2eef1c759e7846db85d4fb14eb02764b6bd02ad .java/deployment/cache/6.0/6/41d72bc6-799a1944 Scan still running, message count now at 130. Look

Re: [clamav-users] Same file, different signatures detected

If you're concerned that they may be flagging with multiple signatures, you can also test using: clamscan --allmatch It will scan for as many signatures as possible instead of just returning the first one it finds. Micah Snyder ClamAV Development Talos Cisco Systems, Inc. On Aug 7, 2018, at

Re: [clamav-users] Bytecode 86 failed to run

Tilman: What's the MD5 or SHA256 of the file, so I can see if we already have it? Thanks, - Alain On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 9:50 AM, Tilman Schmidt wrote: > The problem is back, this time with two bytecodes: 2 and 90. > ClamAV version is 0.100.1. > The last clamscan run without the error was on

Re: [clamav-users] Bytecode 86 failed to run

The problem is back, this time with two bytecodes: 2 and 90. ClamAV version is 0.100.1. The last clamscan run without the error was on 2018-07-26 06:00. The preceding freshclam run said: Thu Jul 26 05:49:13 2018 -> main.cld is up to date (version: 58, sigs: 4566249, f-level: 60, builder: sigmgr) T

Re: [clamav-users] Same file, different signatures detected

Correct. Jar files are essentially zip files. Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 7, 2018, at 07:00, Maarten Broekman wrote: > > JAR files can be unpacked like tarballs so it is likely that there is a > common file in each that matches those hashes. > > Maarten > Sent from a tiny keyboard > >> On

Re: [clamav-users] Same file, different signatures detected

JAR files can be unpacked like tarballs so it is likely that there is a common file in each that matches those hashes. Maarten Sent from a tiny keyboard > On Aug 7, 2018, at 04:54, Albrecht, Peter wrote: > > Hi, > >> I don't see how that is even remotely possibly. They are three completely >

Re: [clamav-users] Same file, different signatures detected

Hi, > I don't see how that is even remotely possibly. They are three completely > different hash signatures: > >[daily.hsb] >9027093eab2a193081a763001e947371:4292:Html.Malware.Agent-6625344-0:73 >[daily.hsb] >5591165097d53565d4e5f4e9fda8241a:7367:Html.Malware.Agent-6625164-0:73 >[daily.hsb] >f

Re: [clamav-users] Same file, different signatures detected

I don't see how that is even remotely possibly. They are three completely different hash signatures: [daily.hsb] 9027093eab2a193081a763001e947371:4292:Html.Malware.Agent-6625344-0:73 [daily.hsb] 5591165097d53565d4e5f4e9fda8241a:7367:Html.Malware.Agent-6625164-0:73 [daily.hsb] f4116176a10805400

[clamav-users] clamdscan and TCPAddr

Hello List, have an odd behaviour of clamav. Version is 0.100.1+dfsg-1ubuntu0.16.04.2 Short: clamscan is able to find a virus in file, clamdscan not. 1st i thought about deprecation of AllowSupplementaryGroups, but was not confirmed. clamdscan -v tells only about an error, but no detailed info

[clamav-users] Same file, different signatures detected

Hi, We have whitelisted certain signatures for files which are only detected by ClamAV to be potentially malicious. And now we face the problem that the same files are reported again, but with a different signature. I already had this behaviour when I tested with the EICAR test virus. The signat