On Monday 17 October 2005 11:35 am, Gary Buckmaster wrote:
After some conversations with one of the dspam developers, the question was
raised as to whether clamav will support streamable unix sockets. Right
now dspam makes calls to clamd via tcp sockets, which isn't inherently bad,
but if
On Thursday 28 October 2004 10:55 am, Scott Ryan wrote:
I will second that... if any of you are ever in South Africa, beers are on
me.
No need my friend.. Its a new world these days..
http://www.sendafriendabeer.com/
;)
Jeff
pgp0WdsS5yxUx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tuesday 19 October 2004 01:34 am, Meni Shapiro wrote:
Two or more scanners from different vendors are recommended in these
days...
OK, but the more is NOT the marrierthe more you got the more
problems you have with interacting with the sendmail.
Either find a better mailer, or
On Tuesday 19 October 2004 08:49 am, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
Jeff Smelser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I KNOW thatand i still work clamAV...I'm not looking for
guarantees, just striving for perfection
All I ment to say is that I learned of a problem (through the
mailing list
On Tuesday 19 October 2004 02:58 pm, Vernon A. Fort wrote:
WARNING: DNS record is older than 3 hours.
WARNING: Invalid DNS reply.
This was just asked and answered.. Its telling something is suspicious with
the dns update, so it is looking for updates the old way.
Now pay attention next
On Tuesday 19 October 2004 04:29 pm, Todd Lyons wrote:
Tomasz Kojm wanted us to know:
WARNING: DNS record is older than 3 hours.
WARNING: Invalid DNS reply.
Please read my today's post in this case.
Could I suggest different verbage:
WARNING: DNS record is older than 3 hours, falling
On Thursday 30 September 2004 01:34 pm, Kelsey Cummings wrote:
My mail sorting rules are going crazy already! And I thought I was messing
something up.
Procmail is great:
:0
* ^List-Id.*clamav-users\.lists\.(clamav.net|sourceforge.net)
.Clamav-Users/
Jeff
pgpT3zMmCdm2H.pgp
Description: PGP
On Sunday 12 September 2004 02:52 pm, Bjrn Ketelaars wrote:
Out of curiosity; when is a development version considered a stable one?
Im asking this because the latest stable is from the 30th of July. Are
there plans to release a stable version any time soon?
I thought Tom just said not two
On Monday 06 September 2004 01:25 pm, Thomas Lamy wrote:
It's a matter of taste. I prefer running it in daemon mode, as freshclam
is rock solid (eg. it hasn't crashed here for months), and due to it's
random start time does not tend to overload the mirrors.
You have to use bashisms or perl (or
On Monday 23 August 2004 11:14 am, ahellary wrote:
seems to work fine for us
I really hope the mirrors take note of your ip and just block people like
you..
It shows great ignorance when you really think this is how you need to run
your servers, or home computer..
Jeff
--
On Monday 23 August 2004 12:21 pm, Julio Canto wrote:
Are you still sugesting that one HTTP Get request every 10 minutes would
crash all the signature mirrors of Clam all over the world? Excuse me if
you don't mean that, English is not my native tongue.
Obviously looking at the big picture
On Tuesday 17 August 2004 02:22 pm, lnx wrote:
X-Virus-Status: Failed
X-Virus-Report: Internal error mktemp MSGTMP failed
X-Virus-Checker-Version: clamassassin 1.2.1 with clamdscan / ClamAV version
0.75.1 signatures 24.457 Status:
Its a clamassassin problem. Whatever directory you using, isnt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 16 August 2004 10:23 pm, Randall Perry wrote:
SECURITY WARNING: NO SUPPORT FOR DIGITAL SIGNATURES
http://www.clamav.net/faq.html
- --
===
Jabber:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 19 June 2004 12:14 pm, Dan Egli wrote:
Can someone kindly explain why on earth you would write a scanner that
only scans ONE FILE? The whole point of clamdscan is it's supposed to be
faster than clamscan because it let's the daemon do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 16 June 2004 11:09 am, Bert Koelewijn wrote:
Oh, come on! This is just shortcoming of ClamAV. Why have a --mbox
option if you can't identify the infected email?! RAV did this better.
The idea wasn't to do an entire file, it was to do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 04 June 2004 09:10 pm, kitten wrote:
Well its postfix, on debian woody. using postfix-mysql if that has
anything to do with the case.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
kitten said:
what am i doing wrong?
It would help greatly if you could
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 02 June 2004 02:18 pm, Crucificator wrote:
So what is the complete solution?
You could start by telling us why its not working.. such as, showing us error
logs or the like..
Our answers would be as worthless as your question so far.
17 matches
Mail list logo
