Re: [Clamav-users] Support for unix socket streams?
On Monday 17 October 2005 11:35 am, Gary Buckmaster wrote: After some conversations with one of the dspam developers, the question was raised as to whether clamav will support streamable unix sockets. Right now dspam makes calls to clamd via tcp sockets, which isn't inherently bad, but if both clamav and dspam are installed on the same box, unix sockets would be a far more efficient way for the two to communicate. Is this something that's been looked at and disregarded? Something that is potentially do-able? # Path to a local socket file the daemon will listen on. # Default: disabled LocalSocket /var/run/clamavd/clamd I thought that was the default.. Jeff pgp3SiKpxH2gS.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Re: [Clamav-users] thank you
On Thursday 28 October 2004 10:55 am, Scott Ryan wrote: I will second that... if any of you are ever in South Africa, beers are on me. No need my friend.. Its a new world these days.. http://www.sendafriendabeer.com/ ;) Jeff pgp0WdsS5yxUx.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
Re: [Clamav-users] non detection problem
On Tuesday 19 October 2004 01:34 am, Meni Shapiro wrote: Two or more scanners from different vendors are recommended in these days... OK, but the more is NOT the marrierthe more you got the more problems you have with interacting with the sendmail. Either find a better mailer, or figure another way to run them if this is a problem. There are a few different ways to run a scanner.. Using the mailer itself, or even using procmail. (i don't want to - but can i trust ClamAV??) We don't guarantee you anything. See COPYING. I KNOW thatand i still work clamAV...I'm not looking for guarantees, just striving for perfection All I ment to say is that I learned of a problem (through the mailing list!!) and is it going to be fixed?? Which i did not get an answer 'till now (cause i missed one email!) It will be fixed ASAP. Grow some patience.. Jeff pgpZSKsAaLGv1.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
Re: [Clamav-users] non detection problem
On Tuesday 19 October 2004 08:49 am, Tomasz Kojm wrote: Jeff Smelser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I KNOW thatand i still work clamAV...I'm not looking for guarantees, just striving for perfection All I ment to say is that I learned of a problem (through the mailing list!!) and is it going to be fixed?? Which i did not get an answer 'till now (cause i missed one email!) It will be fixed ASAP. Grow some patience.. It has been already fixed :-) lol, opps.. ;) What Tomasz said! Jeff pgplvrBgiiLyo.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
Re: [Clamav-users] Freshclam warning
On Tuesday 19 October 2004 02:58 pm, Vernon A. Fort wrote: WARNING: DNS record is older than 3 hours. WARNING: Invalid DNS reply. This was just asked and answered.. Its telling something is suspicious with the dns update, so it is looking for updates the old way. Now pay attention next time.. Jeff pgpsLUZ92a5bX.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
Re: [Clamav-users] Freshclam warning
On Tuesday 19 October 2004 04:29 pm, Todd Lyons wrote: Tomasz Kojm wanted us to know: WARNING: DNS record is older than 3 hours. WARNING: Invalid DNS reply. Please read my today's post in this case. Could I suggest different verbage: WARNING: DNS record is older than 3 hours, falling back to HTTP GET. Would get rid of the questions of what does the error mean? I agree, but I bet you will still see them in here.. ;) Jeff pgpUllFJDNpvZ.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
Re: [Clamav-users] If you want to post/reply to the list, read this please.
On Thursday 30 September 2004 01:34 pm, Kelsey Cummings wrote: My mail sorting rules are going crazy already! And I thought I was messing something up. Procmail is great: :0 * ^List-Id.*clamav-users\.lists\.(clamav.net|sourceforge.net) .Clamav-Users/ Jeff pgpT3zMmCdm2H.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
Re: [Clamav-users] Next Stable?
On Sunday 12 September 2004 02:52 pm, Bjrn Ketelaars wrote: Out of curiosity; when is a development version considered a stable one? Im asking this because the latest stable is from the 30th of July. Are there plans to release a stable version any time soon? I thought Tom just said not two hours ago early next week? -- === Jabber: tradergt@(smelser.org|jabber.org) Quote:The most redundant saying on Usenet: Correct me if I'm wrong. === pgpSHQrEDbQqF.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Clamav-users] freshclam: crontab vs. daemon
On Monday 06 September 2004 01:25 pm, Thomas Lamy wrote: It's a matter of taste. I prefer running it in daemon mode, as freshclam is rock solid (eg. it hasn't crashed here for months), and due to it's random start time does not tend to overload the mirrors. You have to use bashisms or perl (or some really crude sh pipe) to make sure freshclam's cron job does not start exactly on the hour. Why wouldnt you use this minute section? field allowed values - -- minute 0-59 hour 0-23 day of month 1-31 month 1-12 (or names, see below) day of week0-7 (0 or 7 is Sun, or use names) -- === Jabber: tradergt@(smelser.org|jabber.org) Quote:I don't know what I like, but I know what art is. === pgpdWNh0MzjD7.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Clamav-users] Downloading clam virus definition files automatically
On Monday 23 August 2004 11:14 am, ahellary wrote: seems to work fine for us I really hope the mirrors take note of your ip and just block people like you.. It shows great ignorance when you really think this is how you need to run your servers, or home computer.. Jeff -- === Jabber: tradergt@(smelser.org|jabber.org) Quote: Error: Remove disk, spit on it, insert disk and retry. === pgpHxkiFJyjp3.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Clamav-users] Downloading clam virus definition files automatically
On Monday 23 August 2004 12:21 pm, Julio Canto wrote: Are you still sugesting that one HTTP Get request every 10 minutes would crash all the signature mirrors of Clam all over the world? Excuse me if you don't mean that, English is not my native tongue. Obviously looking at the big picture isnt your native tounge either.. One person, or even 20 doing it, isnt probably a big deal.. Lets talk 1000´s, or even 10,000 hits per 10 minutes.. Someone here has the numbers.. When a update happens, now you have everyone downloading it within a 10 minute period.. Thats to much.. You need to really think about ALL the issues, not just a head check. Jeff -- === Jabber: tradergt@(smelser.org|jabber.org) Quote: But you can sure get nothing for something! === pgpJx6u3yGu1T.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Clamav-users] Clam or clamassassin problem
On Tuesday 17 August 2004 02:22 pm, lnx wrote: X-Virus-Status: Failed X-Virus-Report: Internal error mktemp MSGTMP failed X-Virus-Checker-Version: clamassassin 1.2.1 with clamdscan / ClamAV version 0.75.1 signatures 24.457 Status: Its a clamassassin problem. Whatever directory you using, isnt allowing you to create the file it needs to scan. It dumps the email to a temp file and scans it.. Make sure whatever directory your using allowing writing to it. -- === Jabber: tradergt@(smelser.org|jabber.org) Quote: Bards make good cannon fodder. === --- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 ___ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
Re: [Clamav-users] Freshclam errors
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 16 August 2004 10:23 pm, Randall Perry wrote: SECURITY WARNING: NO SUPPORT FOR DIGITAL SIGNATURES http://www.clamav.net/faq.html - -- === Jabber: tradergt@(smelser.org|jabber.org) Quote:Inaccuracy can save a lot of explanation. === -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBIYkEld4MRA3gEwYRAlCzAJ41hCFwE8AwIPD2wJFONxdOOd08rACgqOXK /L2la6NOweqTE+7v6UC7bJk= =lTiB -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 ___ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
Re: [Clamav-users] bug in clamdscan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 19 June 2004 12:14 pm, Dan Egli wrote: Can someone kindly explain why on earth you would write a scanner that only scans ONE FILE? The whole point of clamdscan is it's supposed to be faster than clamscan because it let's the daemon do the scanning, and it just acts as an interface. Doesn't make much sense to then cripple it by only working on one file at a time. Slow down. Its has to be a bug. Its worked here several times in the past. I take it you never wrote code with bugs in it? Jeff - -- === Jabber: tradergt@(smelser.org|jabber.org) Quote: What would the BOFH do? === -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA1HfEld4MRA3gEwYRAjXoAKCFQG/v4xEgeS+5KZfGlSShJfawZwCgguvk NGmzteF+GX+HyNddvm8+NFs= =iRkq -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer Conference, June 28 - July 1 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA REGISTER AND SAVE! http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf Priority Code NWMGYKND ___ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
Re: [Clamav-users] How to disinfect an mbox file?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 16 June 2004 11:09 am, Bert Koelewijn wrote: Oh, come on! This is just shortcoming of ClamAV. Why have a --mbox option if you can't identify the infected email?! RAV did this better. The idea wasn't to do an entire file, it was to do individual files as they came in via a mail server.. - -- This message stops at all railroad crossings. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA0HXqld4MRA3gEwYRArpEAJ9O4LwcQsdA2X3mhoGeTZ+7qpHpQQCdGdVI SDAoStVYnb0t28a2Xvfj12o= =mBiM -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer Conference, June 28 - July 1 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA REGISTER AND SAVE! http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf Priority Code NWMGYKND ___ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
Re: [Clamav-users] clamav is not rejecting virus emails.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 04 June 2004 09:10 pm, kitten wrote: Well its postfix, on debian woody. using postfix-mysql if that has anything to do with the case. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: kitten said: what am i doing wrong? It would help greatly if you could provide a few details about how you've set it up. Are you using Sendmail, qmail, Postfix, Exim... Happy to help if I can, but need the info to determine the suitability of my answer. Clamav doesn't reject anything. It scans and reports what it finds. The rejecting is up to you.. I use procmail to reject things.. Others use other programs.. what are you using?? Jeff - -- Always lurk before you leap... -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAwS2Vld4MRA3gEwYRAndyAKDRWbqNRSvpIYeSQrqvEFd9hk4wHgCdG9Qd jPfLM4udlkAa03XmOPp+Zg4= =uTSY -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X. From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the one installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504 ___ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
Re: [Clamav-users] clamd doesn't work
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 02 June 2004 02:18 pm, Crucificator wrote: So what is the complete solution? You could start by telling us why its not working.. such as, showing us error logs or the like.. Our answers would be as worthless as your question so far. - -- That which does not kill me had better be able to run away damn fast. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAvihild4MRA3gEwYRAjlDAKDbC625AOiq0Aym6g9mhqyP9LurIACePA62 YyACoJL7wIl0IjuO6tXPygg= =IY4i -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X. From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the one installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504 ___ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
