On Thu, March 9, 2017 11:03 am, Groach wrote:
> So what are we saying?
>
> Clamwin people need to be made aware of this? Or ARE aware of this and
> complicit?
ClamWin should be aware of this by now... let's hope they make a statement
of what (if any the issues are) and what versions.
For example
On Thu, March 9, 2017 11:09 am, Al Varnell wrote:
> Or is it based on older versions, like most of the items contained in
> those documents? I suspect that the ClamWin developers are the only ones
> that can tell us what has been or will be done about it.
Exactly, it could just be old version...
Or is it based on older versions, like most of the items contained in those
documents? I suspect that the ClamWin developers are the only ones that can
tell us what has been or will be done about it.
-Al-
On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 03:03 AM, Groach wrote:
>
> So what are we saying?
>
> Clamwin
So what are we saying?
Clamwin people need to be made aware of this? Or ARE aware of this and
complicit? Or people are just paranoid and its nothing more than bad
implementation/software but otherwise causes no problems? Or simpy dont
care? (I hope its not the last 2 because they simply do
Just for those who hasn't spotted ClamWin in the leak:
https://wikileaks.org/ciav7p1/cms/page_27262995.html
Clam Portable
http://portableapps.com/apps/security/clamwin_portable
ClamWin:
http://www.clamwin.com/
--
Cheers,
Steve
Twitter: @sanesecurity
__
