On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 11:06 -0500, Jim Maul wrote:
In fact, apache, a far more common application than ClamAV, requires
vastly more after-install configuration and management effort than does
ClamAV, so his premise is farcical.
Yes, but will it WORK without this after-install
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 at 1:14:38 +, Stephen Gran wrote:
On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 07:23:22PM -0500, Tom Metro said:
[...]
It would also be nice to see the project leaders show a better attitude
towards package maintainers. Not to say they necessarily have a poor
attitude towards them,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Dennis Peterson
Sent: vrijdag 10 november 2006 2:28
To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Cherishing my ignorance - An
appeal to package rs
If one cannot do what
On Nov 9, 2006, at 2:09 PM, Jim Redman wrote:
Folks,
I have to say, of all the lists I subscribe to, the vocal members
of this list are the most arrogant and insulting. However, I
consider comments such as Luca Gibelli's, bandwidth wasting, We
are happy to suffer this loss. and Dennis
Bart Silverstrim wrote:
On Nov 9, 2006, at 2:09 PM, Jim Redman wrote:
Folks,
I have to say, of all the lists I subscribe to, the vocal members of
this list are the most arrogant and insulting. However, I consider
comments such as Luca Gibelli's, bandwidth wasting, We are happy to
suffer
Jim Maul wrote:
Bart Silverstrim wrote:
On Nov 9, 2006, at 2:09 PM, Jim Redman wrote:
Folks,
I have to say, of all the lists I subscribe to, the vocal members of
this list are the most arrogant and insulting. However, I consider
comments such as Luca Gibelli's, bandwidth wasting, We are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Maul wrote:
Maybe i missed it, but where in his original email did he ask anyone
to help him by doing something for him? From what i can see, he
didnt even ask for help at all. The way i took it was:
Gee, I downloaded this package for
James Kosin wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Maul wrote:
Maybe i missed it, but where in his original email did he ask anyone
to help him by doing something for him? From what i can see, he
didnt even ask for help at all. The way i took it was:
Gee, I downloaded
On Nov 9, 2006, at 2:40 PM, Daniel J McDonald wrote:
On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 10:24 -0500, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
On Nov 7, 2006, at 6:48 PM, Jim Redman wrote:
Chris,
Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Jim Redman wrote:
My observation is that of all the modern packages
Dennis Peterson wrote:
Jim Maul wrote:
Bart Silverstrim wrote:
On Nov 9, 2006, at 2:09 PM, Jim Redman wrote:
Folks,
I have to say, of all the lists I subscribe to, the vocal members of
this list are the most arrogant and insulting. However, I consider
comments such as Luca Gibelli's,
On Nov 9, 2006, at 7:23 PM, Tom Metro wrote:
Dennis Peterson wrote:
Jim Redman wrote:
Your opinions, seem to be the prevalent attitude of the vocal
members of this list - if you don't suffer, it wasn't worth it.
His specific problem is he lacks the skill to install and manage
the product.
Bart Silverstrim wrote:
On Nov 9, 2006, at 2:40 PM, Daniel J McDonald wrote:
On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 10:24 -0500, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
On Nov 7, 2006, at 6:48 PM, Jim Redman wrote:
Chris,
Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Jim Redman wrote:
My observation is that of
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
What you're talking about is hassle...if it's too much hassle, you move
on to something else. That's fine and dandy. But there are many many
many people who are using, for example, ClamAV without throwing a fit
because there's too much in the conf
James Kosin wrote:
Like Dennis said Bringing it all together is what the admin is for.
I disagree. There are some things which are the admin's job, but they
are not the catch-all for all unresolved burdens (bringing it all
together).
Pardon my lecture, but lets review the root of our
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Maul wrote:
Are they really no package maintainers on this list? I find that
hard to believe. Is it really necessary to punish someone for
thinking that maybe, just maybe, a message about clamav packages on
the clamav-users list might
Dennis Peterson wrote:
Jim Maul wrote:
somebody else wrote:
Gee, I downloaded this package for clamav and installed it and now
there are all sorts of other things that still need to be done to get
it working correctly. Maybe clamav developers could work with the
package
Dennis Peterson wrote:
Dennis Peterson wrote:
Jim Maul wrote:
somebody else wrote:
Gee, I downloaded this package for clamav and installed it and now
there are all sorts of other things that still need to be done to get
it working correctly. Maybe clamav developers could work with the
On Nov 10, 2006, at 9:45 AM, Jim Maul wrote:
Bart Silverstrim wrote:
On Nov 9, 2006, at 2:09 PM, Jim Redman wrote:
Folks,
I have to say, of all the lists I subscribe to, the vocal members
of this list are the most arrogant and insulting. However, I
consider comments such as Luca
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
On Nov 10, 2006, at 11:07 AM, jef moskot wrote:
If some packages install without difficulty and others do not, then
how about we work together to bring the less efficient packages in line
with the more effective ones?
Now see, that's a
Hmm, I wonder how many of the people who responded in one way or another
is actually familiar with the package in question. I have been using
Linux for a couple years now and have installed thousands of packages. In
general, I have not had any problems navigating the package after it has
On Nov 10, 2006, at 4:10 PM, jef moskot wrote:
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
On Nov 10, 2006, at 11:07 AM, jef moskot wrote:
If some packages install without difficulty and others do not, then
how about we work together to bring the less efficient packages
in line
with the
On Nov 10, 2006, at 6:28 PM, Gary V wrote:
Hmm, I wonder how many of the people who responded in one way or
another is actually familiar with the package in question. I
have been using Linux for a couple years now and have installed
thousands of packages. In general, I have not had any
Bart Silverstrim wrote:
On Nov 10, 2006, at 6:28 PM, Gary V wrote:
Hmm, I wonder how many of the people who responded in one way or
another is actually familiar with the package in question. I have
been using Linux for a couple years now and have installed
thousands of packages. In
On Nov 7, 2006, at 6:48 PM, Jim Redman wrote:
Chris,
Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Jim Redman wrote:
Your opinions, seem to be the prevalent attitude of the vocal
members of this
list - if you don't suffer, it wasn't worth it.
I would disagree, in that I don't see
On Nov 7, 2006, at 6:16 PM, Jim Redman wrote:
Steve,
Steve Holdoway wrote:
You really do need to get out of the mindset that you don't
actually need to know what you're doing to administer a server. It
is *NOT* a trivial task, requires skills to support it, and years
of experience to
Folks,
I have to say, of all the lists I subscribe to, the vocal members of
this list are the most arrogant and insulting. However, I consider
comments such as Luca Gibelli's, bandwidth wasting, We are happy to
suffer this loss. and Dennis Peterson's His specific problem is he
lacks the
On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 10:24 -0500, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
On Nov 7, 2006, at 6:48 PM, Jim Redman wrote:
Chris,
Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Jim Redman wrote:
My observation is that of all the modern packages ClamAV fails to
install and run successfully
On Thu, 9 Nov 2006, Daniel J McDonald wrote:
My observation is that of all the modern packages ClamAV fails to
install and run successfully and securely without operator
intervention. I think that this should be refined to reference
Fedora packages and perhaps not all of them.
Jim Redman wrote:
snippage
I no longer possess the desire to build Linux systems from scratch, or
to customize them so heavily that I cannot benefit from the work of
some of the greats in the community, although I may occasionally
humbly make suggestions that I think might be of benefit
Jim Redman wrote:
I have to say, of all the lists I subscribe to, the vocal members of
this list are the most arrogant and insulting. However, I consider
comments such as Luca Gibelli's, bandwidth wasting, We are happy to
suffer this loss. and Dennis Peterson's His specific problem is he
Dennis Peterson wrote:
Jim Redman wrote:
Your opinions, seem to be the prevalent attitude of the vocal
members of this list - if you don't suffer, it wasn't worth it.
His specific problem is he lacks the skill to install and manage the product.
It's rather sad to see that this elitist
tBB wrote:
I'm sorry for the probably arrogant and insulting tone but you're
literally asking for it.
Perhaps he is asking for it, but he's also right.
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 07:23:22PM -0500, Tom Metro said:
Dennis Peterson wrote:
Jim Redman wrote:
Your opinions, seem to be the prevalent attitude of the vocal
members of this list - if you don't suffer, it wasn't worth it.
His specific problem is he lacks the skill to install and manage
Dennis Peterson wrote:
Jim Redman wrote:
Your opinions, seem to be the prevalent attitude of the vocal
members of this list - if you don't suffer, it wasn't worth it.
His specific problem is he lacks the skill to install and manage the
product.
It's rather sad to see that this
My god!
This topic hasn't been killed yet?!?
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
John Rudd wrote:
Dennis Peterson wrote:
My not-so-automated update process looks like this:
wget (link to current clamav-XXX.tar.gz)
tar xzf clamav-XXX.tar.gz
cd clamav-XXX
configure --disable-zlib-vcheck
make
su
make install
service clamav restart
service
Jim Redman wrote:
James,
James Kosin wrote:
Jim Redman wrote:
Of all the packages I install (Fedora), clamav is the only modern
package that fails to install and just work.
-- snip --
Jim
You are ranting to the wrong group of people. ClamAV has nothing to
do with
My not-so-automated update process looks like this:
wget (link to current clamav-XXX.tar.gz)
tar xzf clamav-XXX.tar.gz
cd clamav-XXX
configure --disable-zlib-vcheck
make
su
make install
service clamav restart
service freshclam restart
You would be wise to uninstall the previous
Bowie,
Bowie Bailey wrote:
Hassle?
My not-so-automated update process looks like this:
wget (link to current clamav-XXX.tar.gz)
tar xzf clamav-XXX.tar.gz
cd clamav-XXX
configure --disable-zlib-vcheck
make
su
make install
service clamav restart
service freshclam restart
The obvious
On Tue, 07 Nov 2006 14:43:11 -0700
Jim Redman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bowie,
Bowie Bailey wrote:
Hassle?
My not-so-automated update process looks like this:
wget (link to current clamav-XXX.tar.gz)
tar xzf clamav-XXX.tar.gz
cd clamav-XXX
configure --disable-zlib-vcheck
Bowie,
The obvious observation that while this might work for you it's not a
general solution, so now everyone needs to create a script.
F'chrissake... It is trivial to do this. Less than 10 minutes, start
to stop. I wrote the script I use 3 years and it took just minutes. I have
10 mail
If it runs out of cron it runs for just milli- seconds - other wise it is
in the proc table
Assuming of course that you don't end up with hundreds of spawned cron jons.
For some reason, I have seen more often than I care to think, multiple cron
jobs firing off freshclam and then not hanging up.
Dennis Peterson wrote:
My not-so-automated update process looks like this:
wget (link to current clamav-XXX.tar.gz)
tar xzf clamav-XXX.tar.gz
cd clamav-XXX
configure --disable-zlib-vcheck
make
su
make install
service clamav restart
service freshclam restart
You would be wise to uninstall the
Steve,
Steve Holdoway wrote:
You really do need to get out of the mindset that you don't actually
need to know what you're doing to administer a server. It is *NOT* a
trivial task, requires skills to support it, and years of experience
to do it well.
Your opinions, seem to be the prevalent
On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Jim Redman wrote:
Your opinions, seem to be the prevalent attitude of the vocal members of this
list - if you don't suffer, it wasn't worth it.
I would disagree, in that I don't see it as suffering.
Forgive me if I missed it, but what is your specific problem ? Perhaps we
Chris,
Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Jim Redman wrote:
Your opinions, seem to be the prevalent attitude of the vocal members of this
list - if you don't suffer, it wasn't worth it.
I would disagree, in that I don't see it as suffering.
Forgive me if I missed it, but
You would be wise to uninstall the previous installation so that you don't
end up with split versions. The man pages have not always been consistent
nor have library names, and uninstall (make uninstall) helps prevent this.
This only serves to illustrate the OP's point.
I agree -
If it runs out of cron it runs for just milli- seconds - other wise it is
in the proc table
Assuming of course that you don't end up with hundreds of spawned cron jons.
rocket science
Run the following fc.sh script from cron every hour
#!/bin/sh
# usage: fc.sh [now]
# Any argument will
On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Jim Redman wrote:
Your opinions, seem to be the prevalent attitude of the vocal members of
this
list - if you don't suffer, it wasn't worth it.
I would disagree, in that I don't see it as suffering.
Forgive me if I missed it, but what is your specific problem
Dennis Peterson wrote:
My not-so-automated update process looks like this:
wget (link to current clamav-XXX.tar.gz)
tar xzf clamav-XXX.tar.gz
cd clamav-XXX
configure --disable-zlib-vcheck
make
su
make install
service clamav restart
service freshclam restart
You would be wise to uninstall the
Dennis Peterson wrote:
Bowie,
The obvious observation that while this might work for you it's not a
general solution, so now everyone needs to create a script.
F'chrissake... It is trivial to do this. Less than 10 minutes, start
to stop. I wrote the script I use 3 years and it took just
John Rudd wrote:
Dennis Peterson wrote:
Bowie,
The obvious observation that while this might work for you it's not a
general solution, so now everyone needs to create a script.
F'chrissake... It is trivial to do this. Less than 10 minutes, start
to stop. I wrote the script I use 3 years and
52 matches
Mail list logo
