Re: [Clamav-users] Email.Phishing.DblDom-59

2009-04-17 Thread Wolfgang Cernohorsky
Suntower West wrote: Hi, I'm getting a positive for this in a Eudora mailbox (which is basically just an ASCII file.) However, when I scan the same file with Comodo it comes up as clean. Today clamav found the same in clamav-users Digest, Vol 55, Issue 15 ... Wolfgang

Re: [Clamav-users] Email.Phishing.DblDom-59

2009-04-17 Thread Dennis Peterson
Wolfgang Cernohorsky wrote: Suntower West wrote: Hi, I'm getting a positive for this in a Eudora mailbox (which is basically just an ASCII file.) However, when I scan the same file with Comodo it comes up as clean. Today clamav found the same in clamav-users Digest, Vol 55, Issue 15

[Clamav-users] Email.Phishing.DblDom-59

2009-04-16 Thread Suntower West
Hi, I'm getting a positive for this in a Eudora mailbox (which is basically just an ASCII file.) However, when I scan the same file with Comodo it comes up as clean. 1. Is this a false positive? 2. If not, then, is there a way to locate the bad code within the text and remove it without

Re: [Clamav-users] Email.Phishing.DblDom-59

2009-04-16 Thread Tom Shaw
Suntower, Its just a detection of a probable phishing link in an email. There is no virus in there just a phish. Tom At 5:33 PM -0700 4/16/09, Suntower West wrote: Hi, I'm getting a positive for this in a Eudora mailbox (which is basically just an ASCII file.) However, when I scan the same

Re: [Clamav-users] Email.Phishing.DblDom-59

2009-04-16 Thread Dennis Peterson
Suntower West wrote: Hi, I'm getting a positive for this in a Eudora mailbox (which is basically just an ASCII file.) However, when I scan the same file with Comodo it comes up as clean. 1. Is this a false positive? 2. If not, then, is there a way to locate the bad code within the

Re: [Clamav-users] Email.Phishing.DblDom-59

2009-04-16 Thread Dennis Peterson
Suntower West wrote: Hi, I'm getting a positive for this in a Eudora mailbox (which is basically just an ASCII file.) However, when I scan the same file with Comodo it comes up as clean. 1. Is this a false positive? 2. If not, then, is there a way to locate the bad code within the