On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 16:08 -0600, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 15:02:57 -0700 Hal Goldfarb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
alert packagers to get a jump? Maybe 2 or 3 days before the support
for the previously supported code is abandoned. Maybe won't work,
You're still missing the
On Feb 16, 2005, at 02:44, Dennis Peterson wrote:
christian laubscher said:
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 06:40:42PM -0700, Hal Goldfarb wrote:
[...] I also think RPM binaries
should be made available before an official release. [...]
please not!
Piggy-backing:
Maybe they could stick a broom up their
Okay, okay.
I guess the RPM business went too far. And you are right this is free
software. But the thing that actually gets me is that when a new release of
Clam comes out, it seems like there is all sorts of catching up to do.
Believe it or not, I actually know how to use rpm tools. And
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 at 3:16:25 -0700, Hal Goldfarb wrote:
[...]
The issue started out -- and then I went overboard because I felt frustrated
-- that all of a sudden I discover that freshclam is not running, and only
because I happened to be looking at it at that moment. Why it stops
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 03:16:25 -0700 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hal Goldfarb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The issue started out -- and then I went overboard because I felt
frustrated -- that all of a sudden I discover that freshclam is not
running, and only because I happened to be looking at it at
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Hal Goldfarb
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 9:41 PM
I am trying to play by the rules, honest. Can you instruct me on how to
properly be informed of clamav code updates? I also think RPM binaries
Piggy-backing:
Maybe they could stick a broom up their bum and sweep the floor at the
same time, too. Dayum, guy - this stuff is free. Get off your butt and
build your own binaries - hell, it takes maybe 10 minutes, is repeatable,
and you get all the credit.
Don't even suggest they put my Solaris
-Original Message-
From: Hal Goldfarb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Clamav-users] No announcement of 0.83 on clamav-announce ML
I am trying to play by the rules, honest. Can you instruct
me on how to
properly be informed of clamav code updates? I also think
RPM
benefit when the software
is easy to install and maintain for all types of users.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Grau
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 6:35 AM
To: ClamAV users ML
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] No announcement of 0.83
On Wednesday 16 February 2005 09:30, John Gallagher wrote:
Your right 99.% of the people using computers are not Unix Admins. But
they sure have an impact on the amount of traffic generated by infected
systems sending email.
While I agree that you should not hold up any code just so you
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 15:02:57 -0700
Hal Goldfarb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
alert packagers to get a jump? Maybe 2 or 3 days before the support
for the previously supported code is abandoned. Maybe won't work,
You're still missing the point here. Please read my yesterday's posts.
--
oo
I subscribed to the clamav-announce mailing list just yesterday. I guess that
was too late to be informed of 0.83. However, I checked the archive for the
clamav-announce list and there does not seem to be any mention of 0.83 there
either. Or do I need to adjust my monitor, change browsers,
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 06:40:42PM -0700, Hal Goldfarb said:
I subscribed to the clamav-announce mailing list just yesterday. I guess
that
was too late to be informed of 0.83. However, I checked the archive for the
clamav-announce list and there does not seem to be any mention of 0.83
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 06:40:42PM -0700, Hal Goldfarb wrote:
[...] I also think RPM binaries
should be made available before an official release. [...]
please not!
--
___
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
christian laubscher said:
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 06:40:42PM -0700, Hal Goldfarb wrote:
[...] I also think RPM binaries
should be made available before an official release. [...]
please not!
Piggy-backing:
Maybe they could stick a broom up their bum and sweep the floor at the
same time,
15 matches
Mail list logo
