Michael D. Crawford wrote:
Recall that I was asking the list recently how to deal
with getting 400 MB a day of the zafi.b virus in my
mailbox. I can filter out my mailbox with a procmail
script, followed by using clamscan and procmail, but
my hosting service isn't yet able to do it for me.
It
Recall that I was asking the list recently how to deal
with getting 400 MB a day of the zafi.b virus in my
mailbox. I can filter out my mailbox with a procmail
script, followed by using clamscan and procmail, but
my hosting service isn't yet able to do it for me.
It turns out that they had
Michael D. Crawford wrote:
Recall that I was asking the list recently how to deal
with getting 400 MB a day of the zafi.b virus in my
mailbox. I can filter out my mailbox with a procmail
script, followed by using clamscan and procmail, but
my hosting service isn't yet able to do it for me.
It
Michael D. Crawford wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Is there a way to filter out the most obvious viruses without using
very much CPU time, so that the processing required to scan all the
remaining messages with clamav wouldn't be so great?
To the clamav devel team: how does the scanner determine
On Sat, 3 Jul 2004 14:40:24 -0700 (PDT)
Michael D. Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It turns out that they had clamav working in their
email processor for a little while, but had to disable
it because it used so much CPU time that the host
wasn't able to keep up with its load. Ironically, I
On Sunday 04 Jul 2004 12:00 am, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Sat, 3 Jul 2004 14:40:24 -0700 (PDT)
Michael D. Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It turns out that they had clamav working in their
email processor for a little while, but had to disable
it because it used so much CPU time that the
Cody Baker wrote:
I would like to append to this that, cheap boxes are good, but they
should be cheap boxes with fast harddrives, or some type of memory file
system scheme. My experience has been that a fast hard drive will
drastically increase the scanning performance. And as mentioned
On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 at 14:40:24 -0700, Michael D. Crawford wrote:
[...]
It turns out that they had clamav working in their
email processor for a little while, but had to disable
it because it used so much CPU time that the host
wasn't able to keep up with its load.
As it has been already
I
think that you should get more details about their
setup and then you
can search documentation and mailing lists of those
particular programs.
I don't know how they had it set up. I'll ask.
I don't normally do any kind of administration of the
hosting service's server. I'm just trying
