René Berber wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Michael Heiming wrote:
| clamav-wrapper is the same file from the latest MS, the SweepViruses.pm
| patched applied cleanly after editing out some garbled text. So I gues
| it is just the same with the clamav-wrapper
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:49:26 +0200
Michael Heiming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Rene,
thx a bunch for sending the patch as attachment off the list. Works like
a charm, performance is well back. ;-) Seem it was indeed the patch just
got garbled on the list, as thought.
Best regards
René Berber wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Michael Heiming wrote:
| Tests show pretty bad performance with 0.90.2 and clamscan. Running
| Mailscanner it seems not trivial to switch to clamd,
It is trivial, just change lib/clamav-wrapper and
Michael Heiming wrote:
René Berber wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Michael Heiming wrote:
| Tests show pretty bad performance with 0.90.2 and clamscan. Running
| Mailscanner it seems not trivial to switch to clamd,
It is trivial, just change lib/clamav-wrapper and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Heiming wrote:
René Berber wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Michael Heiming wrote:
Tests show pretty bad performance with 0.90.2 and clamscan. Running
Mailscanner it seems not trivial to switch to clamd,
It is trivial, just
Randal, Phil wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Heiming wrote:
René Berber wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Michael Heiming wrote:
Tests show pretty bad performance with 0.90.2 and clamscan. Running
Mailscanner it seems not trivial to switch to clamd,
It is
Michael Heiming wrote:
Michael Heiming wrote:
René Berber wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Michael Heiming wrote:
| Tests show pretty bad performance with 0.90.2 and clamscan. Running
| Mailscanner it seems not trivial to switch to clamd,
It is trivial, just change
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Michael Heiming wrote:
| clamav-wrapper is the same file from the latest MS, the SweepViruses.pm
| patched applied cleanly after editing out some garbled text. So I gues
| it is just the same with the clamav-wrapper patch, though I can't find
|
Hi!
Tests show pretty bad performance with 0.90.2 and clamscan. Running
Mailscanner it seems not trivial to switch to clamd, which might
although have other shortcomings in terms of Mailscanner not knowing if
it is running.
The patch provided on the clamav-devel list seems to improve things,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Michael Heiming wrote:
| Tests show pretty bad performance with 0.90.2 and clamscan. Running
| Mailscanner it seems not trivial to switch to clamd,
It is trivial, just change lib/clamav-wrapper and
lib/MailScanner/SweepViruses.pm; I include my
10 matches
Mail list logo