Damian Menscher wanted us to know:
On Fri, 27 May 2005, lattera wrote:
can't use strace, because I don't know the email that is making it
hang. that is why I need to use gdb, so I can look through the
stack/heap for the email...
You're saying it's hung, taking 100% of CPU. So just use top to
Well, clamscan still hangs. I'm using version 0.85.1. I cannot gdb
attach to tell you guys why/where it's hanging, I'm sorry.
--
lattera
http://lattera.antitech.org/
http://lattera.retoros.org/
http://retoros.org/
___
On Fri, 27 May 2005, lattera wrote:
Well, clamscan still hangs. I'm using version 0.85.1. I cannot gdb
attach to tell you guys why/where it's hanging, I'm sorry.
What about an strace (or whatever your OS equivalent is)?
Damian Menscher
--
-=#| Physics Grad Student SysAdmin @ U Illinois
can't use strace, because I don't know the email that is making it
hang. that is why I need to use gdb, so I can look through the
stack/heap for the email...
On 5/27/05, Damian Menscher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 27 May 2005, lattera wrote:
Well, clamscan still hangs. I'm using version
On Fri, 27 May 2005, lattera wrote:
can't use strace, because I don't know the email that is making it
hang. that is why I need to use gdb, so I can look through the
stack/heap for the email...
You're saying it's hung, taking 100% of CPU. So just use top to find
the PID of the hung process,
On Mon, 23 May 2005, lattera wrote:
using an old version is because that's what's in NetBSD's pkgsrc tree.
I'm sorry if I bothered any of you with my email. Thanks for
responding.
What kind of error output do you get if you build 0.85.1 from source? I
usually just build :
./configure
thus [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake:
On Mon, 23 May 2005, lattera wrote:
using an old version is because that's what's in NetBSD's pkgsrc tree.
I'm sorry if I bothered any of you with my email. Thanks for
responding.
What kind of error output do you get if you build 0.85.1 from source? I
Sorry, tomaz, replied only to you, not to the mailinglist...
I've upgraded to 0.85, and the problem is worse. I get about 10 hung
processes per 30 minutes. It's really killing the server. I've
searched the mailing list, and there is no C_URANDOM in the header
files (as what the best answer for
On Mon, 23 May 2005 09:06:05 -0600
lattera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, tomaz, replied only to you, not to the mailinglist...
I've upgraded to 0.85, and the problem is worse. I get about 10 hung
0.85 is broken.
--
oo. Tomasz Kojm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(\/)\.
* lattera [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20050523 18:07]: wrote:
Sorry, tomaz, replied only to you, not to the mailinglist...
I've upgraded to 0.85, and the problem is worse. I get about 10 hung
processes per 30 minutes. It's really killing the server. I've
searched the mailing list, and there is no
On 5/23/05, Odhiambo Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gdb `which clamscan` core_file
I can't do that, since there is no core file (clamscan isn't
segfaulting, but is just hanging)...
Shawn Webb
--
lattera
http://lattera.antitech.org/
http://lattera.retoros.org/
http://retoros.org/
* lattera [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20050523 19:27]: wrote:
On 5/23/05, Odhiambo Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gdb `which clamscan` core_file
I can't do that, since there is no core file (clamscan isn't
segfaulting, but is just hanging)...
Is there a reason you are not using clamdscan then?
On 5/23/05, Odhiambo Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a reason you are not using clamdscan then?
Good question :)
I think that maybe I can change qmail-scanner-queue.pl to use
clamdscan. Maybe that will solve all my headaches (having to kill -9
about 10 processes every half hour). I
On Mon, 23 May 2005 17:26:29 +
lattera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/23/05, Odhiambo Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a reason you are not using clamdscan then?
Good question :)
I think that maybe I can change qmail-scanner-queue.pl to use
clamdscan. Maybe that will
thus lattera spake:
On 5/23/05, Tomasz Kojm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
clamd will loop instead
do you guys know, then, when 0.85.1 will be merged into pkgsrc?
it's more likely that the people at the pkgsrc mailing lists know this ;)
it should be real soon though.
cheers,
--
Timo
thus lattera spake:
On 5/23/05, Tomasz Kojm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
clamd will loop instead
do you guys know, then, when 0.85.1 will be merged into pkgsrc?
just another thing:
you seem to run pkgsrc. just install pkg_chk from pkgtools and run it
from time to time against an updated (!)
On 5/23/05, Timo Schoeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
just another thing:
you seem to run pkgsrc. just install pkg_chk from pkgtools and run it
from time to time against an updated (!) pkgsrc tree, i.e. first run
cvs, sup or the way you like to update pkgsrc, and then run
pkg_chk -i
this
bash-3.00# uname -a
NetBSD 2.0.2 NetBSD 2.0.2 (GENERIC) #0: Thu Mar 24 02:28:37 MST 2005
root@:/usr/obj/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC amd64
bash-3.00# clamscan -V
ClamAV 0.84/889/Sun May 22 04:18:49 2005
I've been noticing several clamscan processes running, taking up 100%
of the CPU. Some
On Sun, 22 May 2005 18:48:53 +
lattera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bash-3.00# clamscan -V
ClamAV 0.84/889/Sun May 22 04:18:49 2005
[...]
and I love the product you guys have spent time making.
I don't think so. Actually you have no respect to our work and time.
The problem described by you
why would you say that I have no respect? The only reason why I'm
using an old version is because that's what's in NetBSD's pkgsrc tree.
I'm sorry if I bothered any of you with my email. Thanks for
responding.
Shawn Webb
On 5/22/05, Tomasz Kojm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 22 May 2005
scratch that, it's been updated in the tree since my last cvs up,
which was around two weeks ago.
Shawn Webb
On 5/23/05, lattera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
why would you say that I have no respect? The only reason why I'm
using an old version is because that's what's in NetBSD's pkgsrc tree.
pkgsrc tree is up to 0.85, not 0.85.1. After upgrading, within ten
minutes I've got two processes taking up 100% of the CPU. So unless
it's been fixed in 0.85.1, I'm still having the problem.
Shawn Webb
On 5/23/05, lattera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
scratch that, it's been updated in the tree
22 matches
Mail list logo
