Re: [clamav-users] ClamAv local results differ from ClamAV at VirusTotal.com

2018-01-14 Thread Paul B.
Micah, Thanks for the explanation. As I thought about this, I realized that if I go to the trouble of a VirusTotal scan, I ought to switch to the big picture and take all the engines there into account. On truly dubious items I probably will just take the local ClamAV's report on face value and

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAv local results differ from ClamAV at VirusTotal.com

2018-01-14 Thread Micah Snyder (micasnyd)
Your results locally could differ from VirusTotal a little even if you just had VirusTotal re-scan the file. I believe they are running ClamAV v0.99.2 and there are is some slight variation between that and the latest 0.99.3-beta2 but there isn’t much and it should be for the better. Of

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAv local results differ from ClamAV at VirusTotal.com

2018-01-13 Thread Paul B.
I began doing so with the first hit, then at the bottom of the page I saw the notice to first update the sigs with freshclam. Freshclam runs on an hourly schedule here, so I saw little need to do so, but for completeness I did, and it showed no updating, and said the sigs were up to date. The

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAv local results differ from ClamAV at VirusTotal.com

2018-01-12 Thread Al Varnell
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 08:31 PM, Paul B. wrote: > I just ran a scan on my root drive, and had 3 hits. I ran each of them > by VirusTotal, and each VT had ClamAV reporting them as Clean. The > output here was: > >

[clamav-users] ClamAv local results differ from ClamAV at VirusTotal.com

2018-01-12 Thread Paul B.
I just ran a scan on my root drive, and had 3 hits. I ran each of them by VirusTotal, and each VT had ClamAV reporting them as Clean. The output here was: /home/paul/.config/vivaldi/Default/Extensions/kbmfpngjjgdllneeigpgjifpgocmfgmb/5.10.1_0/foreground.entry.js.map: