On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Benny Pedersen m...@junc.org wrote:
francis picabia skrev den 16-11-2012 21:14:
This appears to be what the Debian system does when the freshclam
daemon handles things. Should my Redhat cron
do the same?
if you like to see redhat performs as badly as
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Benny Pedersen m...@junc.org wrote:
francis picabia skrev den 16-11-2012 21:14:
This appears to be what the Debian system does when the freshclam
daemon handles things. Should my Redhat cron
do the same?
if you like to see redhat performs as badly as
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 09:38:30PM CET, Benny Pedersen m...@junc.org said:
francis picabia skrev den 16-11-2012 21:14:
This appears to be what the Debian system does when the freshclam
daemon handles things. Should my Redhat cron
do the same?
if you like to see redhat performs as badly
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Erwan David er...@rail.eu.org wrote:
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 09:38:30PM CET, Benny Pedersen m...@junc.org said:
francis picabia skrev den 16-11-2012 21:14:
This appears to be what the Debian system does when the freshclam
daemon handles things. Should my
francis picabia skrev den 16-11-2012 19:56:
Here is the daily cron I have on Redhat
#!/bin/sh
maybe start configure freshclam.conf and then start freshclam daemond
would solve it without any redhats cron scripting that unpacks cvd files
?
no cvd ?
what happend if just issue freshclam as
francis picabia skrev den 16-11-2012 21:14:
This appears to be what the Debian system does when the freshclam
daemon handles things. Should my Redhat cron
do the same?
if you like to see redhat performs as badly as debian yes
stop using cron to get clamav updated, stop using anything that
I have a primary MX running Redhat, with postfix+amavisd+clamav
I also have a secondary MX and SMTP gateway running Debian, with
postfix+amavisd-new+clamav
Recently we adopted use of Sanesecurity additions, using the scamp script
on both MX and SMTP.
Root receives virus notifications on the
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 2:56 PM, francis picabia fpica...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a primary MX running Redhat, with postfix+amavisd+clamav
I also have a secondary MX and SMTP gateway running Debian, with
postfix+amavisd-new+clamav
Recently we adopted use of Sanesecurity additions, using the
