Re: [clamav-users] Win.Trojan.Toa-5368540-0 - How many people need to complain before you listen?

Because the address is bugzilla.clamav.net. This will be fixed by removing the bugs.clamav.net dns entry. But I don't want to remove it until the links inside the tarball + any documentation has been adjusted to say bugzilla. -- Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 29, 2016, at 10:05 AM, Benny

Re: [clamav-users] Win.Trojan.Toa-5368540-0 - How many people need to complain before you listen?

Am 29.12.2016 um 16:15 schrieb Kris Deugau: Groach wrote: If I could exclude the Clam default signatures and just continue to use Sane then I would and then I could turn back on quarantining to make our systems safe again. You can; turn off freshclam and delete the stock signature files.

Re: [clamav-users] Win.Trojan.Toa-5368540-0 - How many people need to complain before you listen?

On Thursday 29 December 2016 07:06:38 Groach wrote: > On 29/12/2016 09:32, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 29.12.2016 um 10:21 schrieb Reindl Harald: > >> state of the official sgnatures is that clamav don't catch many > >> real malware all over the time without sanesecurity 3rd party > >> signatures

Re: [clamav-users] Win.Trojan.Toa-5368540-0 - How many people need to complain before you listen?

Groach wrote: > If I could exclude the Clam default > signatures and just continue to use Sane then I would and then I could > turn back on quarantining to make our systems safe again. You can; turn off freshclam and delete the stock signature files. Also make sure that you don't use the

Re: [clamav-users] Win.Trojan.Toa-5368540-0 - How many people need to complain before you listen?

Am 29.12.2016 um 14:40 schrieb Mark Allan: On 29 Dec 2016, at 12:06 pm, Steve Basford wrote: In clamscan there is: --official-db-only[=yes/no(*)] Only load official signatures in clamd.conf there is: OfficialDatabaseOnly#Only loading official

Re: [clamav-users] Win.Trojan.Toa-5368540-0 - How many people need to complain before you listen?

Am 29.12.2016 um 13:06 schrieb Steve Basford: On Thu, December 29, 2016 9:32 am, Reindl Harald wrote: i would love to be able to *completly* exclude "daily.cld", "daily.cvd" and "main.cvd" and only update "safebrowsing.cvd" daily.cvd and main.cvd are compressed versions of multiple

Re: [clamav-users] Win.Trojan.Toa-5368540-0 - How many people need to complain before you listen?

On December 29, 2016 13:06:51 "Steve Basford" wrote: https://bugs.clamav.net/show_bug.cgi?id=11708 still ssl error ___ clamav-users mailing list clamav-users@lists.clamav.net

Re: [clamav-users] Win.Trojan.Toa-5368540-0 - How many people need to complain before you listen?

On Thu, December 29, 2016 1:40 pm, Mark Allan wrote: > It seems a little overkill to add a new feature for this. Couldn't you > just delete the cvd/cld file and prevent freshclam from running? Or > better yet, write a wrapper around freshclam so the update still takes > place and then unpack the

Re: [clamav-users] Win.Trojan.Toa-5368540-0 - How many people need to complain before you listen?

> On 29 Dec 2016, at 12:06 pm, Steve Basford > wrote: > > In clamscan there is: > > --official-db-only[=yes/no(*)] Only load official signatures > > in clamd.conf there is: > > OfficialDatabaseOnly#Only loading official signatures. > > I suppose

Re: [clamav-users] Win.Trojan.Toa-5368540-0 - How many people need to complain before you listen?

Noted. Confirmed FP's no longer being reported. (Still looking forward to the new improved QA system, and one that doesnt require a mailing list uproar before the issues get identified). On 29/12/2016 13:14, Joel Esler (jesler) wrote: We are showing that all Toa signatures have been

Re: [clamav-users] Win.Trojan.Toa-5368540-0 - How many people need to complain before you listen?

We are showing that all Toa signatures have been dropped. Please run freshclam to drop the sigs. -- Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 29, 2016, at 8:03 AM, Joel Esler (jesler) wrote: > > I'm not dismissing anything. (Except the notion that I am dismissing things). > I know

Re: [clamav-users] Win.Trojan.Toa-5368540-0 - How many people need to complain before you listen?

I'm not dismissing anything. (Except the notion that I am dismissing things). I know one of our guys is monitoring the list during the holiday. I'll ping him. -- Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 29, 2016, at 7:07 AM, Groach > wrote: > >> On 29/12/2016

Re: [clamav-users] Win.Trojan.Toa-5368540-0 - How many people need to complain before you listen?

On Thu, December 29, 2016 9:32 am, Reindl Harald wrote: > >i would love to be able to *completly* exclude >"daily.cld", "daily.cvd" and "main.cvd" and only update >"safebrowsing.cvd" daily.cvd and main.cvd are compressed versions of multiple databases... eg. sigtool --unpack-current=daily

Re: [clamav-users] Win.Trojan.Toa-5368540-0 - How many people need to complain before you listen?

Am 29.12.2016 um 10:21 schrieb Reindl Harald: Am 29.12.2016 um 03:54 schrieb Al Varnell: Over 11,000 of them were dropped several days ago, but a few were added at the same time. I have no idea what the status of those new ones are and maybe I've lost track, but I believe only one of the new

Re: [clamav-users] Win.Trojan.Toa-5368540-0 - How many people need to complain before you listen?

Am 29.12.2016 um 03:54 schrieb Al Varnell: Over 11,000 of them were dropped several days ago, but a few were added at the same time. I have no idea what the status of those new ones are and maybe I've lost track, but I believe only one of the new ones has been brought up here. Since all

Re: [clamav-users] Win.Trojan.Toa-5368540-0 - How many people need to complain before you listen?

On Dec 28, 2016, at 2:13 PM, Groach wrote: > Ok, I know it has already been mentioned before in another 2 threads but it > seems once again Joel is dismissing the claims or the responsibilities of it > being damaging to peoples systems (regularly quarantining genuine files and > emails) and