Re: [Clamav-users] Troubles with recent clamav's

2004-03-19 Thread Robert Blayzor
On 3/18/04 5:40 PM, Doug Hardie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My quick look at the code behind --disable-urandom gave me the impression that it only disabled the test for urandom and forced clamd to use urandom. Thats why I manually deleted the define. I guess I will have to look a bit closer.

Re: [Clamav-users] Troubles with recent clamav's

2004-03-19 Thread Doug Hardie
On Mar 19, 2004, at 05:17, Robert Blayzor wrote: On 3/18/04 5:40 PM, Doug Hardie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My quick look at the code behind --disable-urandom gave me the impression that it only disabled the test for urandom and forced clamd to use urandom. Thats why I manually deleted the

Re: [Clamav-users] Troubles with recent clamav's

2004-03-19 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 13:27:46 -0800 Doug Hardie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, I went back and rebuilt clamd with --disable-urandom and thats exactly what it does. It comments out the define of C_URANDOM. I don't quite see how it does that yet, but thats not important. It make clamd

Re: [Clamav-users] Troubles with recent clamav's

2004-03-18 Thread Robert Blayzor
On 3/16/04 7:29 PM, Doug Hardie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The problem I encountered has now been identified and I have a working clamd that does not hang. I compiled it two different ways and both worked. The problem was /dev/urandom returning either a -1 or a 0. Either of those will cause

Re: [Clamav-users] Troubles with recent clamav's

2004-03-18 Thread Robert Blayzor
On 3/16/04 7:29 PM, Doug Hardie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In case it might help someone else, the approach I used to find the problem was to use a test system and pass a large number of directories (The FreeBSD source code) to clamdscan and let it beat clamd up for about 5 minutes. Then I let

RE: [Clamav-users] Troubles with recent clamav's

2004-03-17 Thread Randal, Phil
Doug Hardie erote: The problem I encountered has now been identified and I have a working clamd that does not hang. I compiled it two different ways and both worked. The problem was /dev/urandom returning either a -1 or a 0. Either of those will cause others.c to hang as it does not

Re: [Clamav-users] Troubles with recent clamav's

2004-03-16 Thread Everton da Silva Marques
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 03:36:40PM +0200, turgut kalfaoglu wrote: I am running clamav under SunOS 5.8. Ever since version 0.67 (or so, I am not checking them regularly) , I have been unable to leave ClamAV running. It does run, but after some minutes, it stops processing emails. It is

Re: [Clamav-users] Troubles with recent clamav's

2004-03-16 Thread Doug Hardie
On Mar 16, 2004, at 11:48, Everton da Silva Marques wrote: On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 03:36:40PM +0200, turgut kalfaoglu wrote: I am running clamav under SunOS 5.8. Ever since version 0.67 (or so, I am not checking them regularly) , I have been unable to leave ClamAV running. It does run, but

Re: [Clamav-users] Troubles with recent clamav's

2004-03-16 Thread Fajar A. Nugraha
Doug Hardie wrote: The problem I encountered has now been identified and I have a working clamd that does not hang. I compiled it two different ways and both worked. The problem was /dev/urandom returning either a -1 or a 0. Either of those will cause others.c to hang as it does not

Re: [Clamav-users] Troubles with recent clamav's

2004-03-16 Thread Turgut Kalfaoglu
Thank you Everton! I have amavisd-new with spamassassin, and clamd is the only virus scanner I have on that system. Therefore, when amavisd starts, it automatically starts using clamd. However, with all the new versions, I noticed that clamd would start out fine, clean out some viruses for some

Re: [Clamav-users] Troubles with recent clamav's

2004-03-16 Thread Turgut Kalfaoglu
I believe this is a different problem than mine - my SunOS does not have /dev/urandom either.. -turgut On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: Doug Hardie wrote: The problem I encountered has now been identified and I have a working clamd that does not hang. I compiled it two